Effect of Isothermal Aging on the Long-Term Reliability of Fine-Pitch Sn–Ag–Cu and Sn–Ag Solder Interconnects With and Without Board-Side Ni Surface Finish
- 194 Downloads
- 1 Citations
Abstract
The combined effects on long-term reliability of isothermal aging and chemically balanced or unbalanced surface finish have been investigated for fine-pitch ball grid array packages with Sn–3.0Ag–0.5Cu (SAC305) (wt.%) and Sn–3.5Ag (SnAg) (wt.%) solder ball interconnects. Two different printed circuit board surface finishes were selected to compare the effects of chemically balanced and unbalanced structure interconnects with and without board-side Ni surface finish. NiAu/solder/Cu and NiAu/solder/NiAu interconnects were isothermally aged and thermally cycled to evaluate long-term thermal fatigue reliability. Weibull plots of the combined effects of each aging condition and each surface finish revealed lifetime for NiAu/SAC305/Cu was reduced by approximately 40% by aging at 150°C; less degradation was observed for NiAu/SAC305/NiAu. Further reduction of characteristic life-cycle number was observed for NiAu/SnAg/NiAu joints. Microstructure was studied, focusing on its evolution near the board and package-side interfaces. Different mechanisms of aging were apparent under the different joint configurations. Their effects on the fatigue life of solder joints are discussed.
Keywords
Pb-free solder isothermal aging microstructure NiAu surface finish OSP surface finishPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Acknowledgements
This work is a research project supported by the Cisco Component Quality and Technology group in the Technology and Quality group.
References
- 1.D.R. Frear and P.T. Vianco, Metall. Trans. A 25A, 1509 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.J. Glazer, Int. Mater. Rev. 40, 65 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.H.K. Kim and K.N. Tu, Phys. Rev. B 53, 16027 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.H. Ma, J.C. Suhling, P. Lall, and M.J. Bozack, Proceeding of the 56th Electronic Components and Technology Conference (May 2006, San Diego, CA).Google Scholar
- 5.T.-K. Lee, H. Ma, and K.-C. Liu, J. Electron. Mater. 39, 2564 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.M. Mori, K. Miura, T. Sasaki, and T. Ohtsuka, Corros. Sci. 44, 887 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.M. Abtew and G. Selvaduray, Mater. Sci. Eng. R 27, 95 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.B. Liu, T.-K. Lee, and K.-C. Liu, J. Electron. Mater. 40, 2111 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.H.G. Song, J.W. Morris Jr, and F. Hua, JOM 56, 30 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.K.W. Moon, W.J. Boettinger, U.R. Kattner, F.S. Biancaniello, and C.A. Handwerker, J. Electron. Mater. 29, 1122 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.W.K. Choi and H.M. Lee, J. Electron. Mater. 29, 1207 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.A.J. Sunwoo, J.W. Morris Jr, and G.K. Lucey Jr, Metall. Trans. A 23A, 1323 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Z. Mei and J.W. Morris, J. Electron. Mater. 21, 599 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.F. Bartels, J.W. Morris Jr, G. Dalke, and W. Gust, J. Electron. Mater. 23, 787 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.T.-K. Lee, W. Xie, B. Zhou, T. Bieler, and K.-C. Liu, J. Electron. Mater. 40, 1967 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.T.-K. Lee, J. Electron. Mater. 42, 599 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.L.Y. Hsiao, G.Y. Jang, K.J. Wang, and J.G. Duh, J. Electron. Mater. 36, 1476 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.S.‐H. Chae, B. Chao, X. Zhang, J. Imand, and P.S. Ho, Electronic Components and Technology Conference (2007), p. 1442.Google Scholar