Journal of Electronic Materials

, Volume 42, Issue 7, pp 2214–2220 | Cite as

Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Thermoelectric Power Generation



Autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs) are a vital part of the oceanographer’s toolbox, allowing long-term measurements across a range of ocean depths of a number of ocean properties such as salinity, fluorescence, and temperature profile. Buoyancy-based gliding, rather than direct propulsion, dramatically reduces AUV power consumption and allows long-duration missions on the order of months rather than hours or days, allowing large distances to be analyzed or many successive analyses of a certain area without the need for retrieval. Recent versions of these gliders have seen the buoyancy variation system change from electrically powered to thermally powered using phase-change materials, however a significant battery pack is still required to power communications and sensors, with power consumption in the region of 250 mW. The authors propose a novel application of a thermoelectric generation system, utilizing the depth-related variation in oceanic temperature. A thermal energy store provides a temperature differential across which a thermoelectric device can generate from repeated dives, with the primary purpose of extending mission range. The system is modeled in Simulink to analyze the effect of variation in design parameters. The system proves capable of generating all required power for a modern AUV.


Autonomous vehicle AUV robotic thermoelectric harvesting 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    S.M. Abu Sharkh, G. Griffiths, and A.T. Webb, Technology and Applications of Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (Taylor & Francis, London, 2003), p. 19. ISBN 0415301548.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    D.L. Rudnick, R.E. Davis, C.C. Eriksen, D.M. Fratantoni, and M.J. Perry, Mar. Technol. Soc. J. 38, 48–59 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    P. Simonetti, Slocum Glider: design and 1991 field trials. Office of Naval Technology. Contract N00014-90C-0098 Report, 1992.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    R. Bachmayer, N.E. Leonard, J. Graver, E. Fiorelli, P. Bhatta, and D. Paley, Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Underwater Technology (UT’04), Tapei, Taiwan.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    J. Sherman, R.E. Davis, W.B. Owens, and J. Valdes, IEEE J. Oceanic Eng. 26, 437–446 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    D.C. Webb, P.J. Simonetti, and C.P. Jones, IEEE J. Oceanic Eng. 26, 447–452 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    G. Griffiths, C. Jones, J. Ferguson, and N. Bose, J. Ocean Technol. 2, 64–75 (2007).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    D. Blidberg, S. Mupparapu, S. Chappell, R. Komerska, J.C. Jalbert, and R. Nitzel, Oceans 2005—Europe 1, 545 (2005).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    H.-L. Tsai and J.-M. Lin, J. Electron. Mater. 39, 2105–2111 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© TMS 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. R. Buckle
    • 1
  • A. Knox
    • 1
  • J. Siviter
    • 1
  • A. Montecucco
    • 1
  1. 1.School of EngineeringUniversity of GlasgowGlasgowScotland, UK

Personalised recommendations