Thermoelectric Properties of Nb-Doped Ordered Mesoporous TiO2
- 386 Downloads
- 12 Citations
Abstract
Mesoporous materials have pores with diameters between 2 nm and 50 nm, the presence of which generally decreases the thermal conductivity of the material. By incorporating mesoporous structures into thermoelectric materials, the thermoelectric properties of these materials can be improved. Although TiO2 is an ordinary insulator, reduced TiO2 shows better electrical conductivity and is therefore a potential thermoelectric material. Furthermore, the addition of a dopant to TiO2 can improve its electrical conductivity. We hypothesized that, by doping ordered mesoporous TiO2 films with niobium, we would be able to minimize the thermal conductivity and maximize the electrical conductivity. To investigate the effects of Nb doping and a mesoporous structure on the thermoelectric characteristics of TiO2 films, Nb-doped mesoporous films were investigated using x-ray diffraction, ellipsometry, four-point probe measurements, and thermal conductivity analysis. We found that Nb doping of ordered mesoporous TiO2 films improved their thermoelectric properties.
Keywords
Mesoporous TiO2 film Nb doping thermoelectric conductivityPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.B.C. Sales, Science 295, 1248 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.G.J. Snyder and E.S. Toberer, Nat. Mater. 7, 105 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.G.S. Nolas, J. Poon, and M. Kanatzidis, MRS Bull. 31, 199 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.D.J. Kim, D.S. Kim, S. Cho, S.W. Kim, S.H. Lee, and J.C. Kim, Int. J. Thermophys. 25, 1 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.D.T. On, Langmuir 15, 8561 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.V.F. Stone and R.J. Davis, Chem. Mater. 10, 1468 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.T.-J. Ha, H.-H. Park, E.S. Kang, S. Shin, and H.H. Cho, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 345, 120 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.M. Bettinelli, A. Speghini, D. Falcomer, M. Daldosso, V. Dallacasa, and L. Romano, J. Phys. 18, S214 (2006).Google Scholar
- 9.P.G. Klemens, Int. J. Thermophys. 22, 1 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.G.G. Fuentes, E. Elizalde, F. Huber, and J.M. Sanz, Surf. Interface Anal. 33, 230 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Z.J. Xiao and G.A. Somorjai, J. Phys. Chem. B 109, 22530 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.M.R. Baklanov and K.P. Mogilnikov, Microelectron. Eng. 64, 335 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.B.-Y. Tsui, C.-C. Yang, and K.-L. Fang, IEEE Trans. Electron. Dev. 51, 20 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.A.B. Dros, D. Grosso, C. Boissiere, G.J.A.A. Soler-Illia, P.-A. Albouy, H. Amenitsch, and C. Sanchez, Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 94, 208 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.B.D. Cullity and S.R. Stock, Elements of X-ray Diffraction (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2001).Google Scholar
- 16.M.C. Carotta, M. Ferroni, D. Gnani, V. Guide, M. Merli, G. Martinelli, M.C. Casale, and M. Notaro, Sens. Actuator B-Chem. 58, 310 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.K. Yu, B. Smarsly, and C.J. Brinker, Adv. Funct. Mater. 13, 47 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.C.J. Brinker and G.W. Scherer, Sol-Gel Science, 2nd ed. (San Diego: Academic, 1990), pp. 795, 108, 127, 104.Google Scholar
- 19.M.R. Li and E. Orignac, EPL 60, 432 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.T.-J. Ha, H.-H. Park, S.-Y. Jung, S.-J. Yoon, J.-S. Kim, and H.W. Jang, Thin Solid Films 518, 7196 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar