Journal of Electronic Materials

, Volume 39, Issue 12, pp 2564–2573 | Cite as

Impact of Isothermal Aging on Long-Term Reliability of Fine-Pitch Ball Grid Array Packages with Sn-Ag-Cu Solder Interconnects: Surface Finish Effects



The interaction between isothermal aging and the long-term reliability of fine-pitch ball grid array (BGA) packages with Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu (wt.%) solder ball interconnects was investigated. In this study, 0.4-mm fine-pitch packages with 300-μm-diameter Sn-Ag-Cu solder balls were used. Two different package substrate surface finishes were selected to compare their effects on the final solder composition, especially the effect of Ni, during thermal cycling. To study the impact on thermal performance and long-term reliability, samples were isothermally aged and thermally cycled from 0°C to 100°C with 10 min dwell time. Based on Weibull plots for each aging condition, package lifetime was reduced by approximately 44% by aging at 150°C. Aging at 100°C showed a smaller impact but similar trend. The microstructure evolution was observed during thermal aging and thermal cycling with different phase microstructure transformations between electrolytic Ni/Au and organic solderability preservative (OSP) surface finishes, focusing on the microstructure evolution near the package-side interface. Different mechanisms after aging at various conditions were observed, and their impacts on the fatigue lifetime of solder joints are discussed.


Pb-free solder isothermal aging microstructure Ni/Au surface finish OSP surface finish 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    J. Glazer, Int. Mater. Rev. 40, 65 (1995).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    H.K. Kim and K.N. Tu, Phys. Rev. B 53, 16027 (1996).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. Glazer, J. Electron. Mater. 23, 8 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    W. Xie, T.-K. Lee, K.-C. Liu, and J. Xue, IEEE 60th Electronic Components and Technology Conference (ECTC) (Las Vegas, NV, June 2010).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    H.G. Song, J.W. Morris Jr., and F. Hua, JOM 56, 30 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    K.W. Moon, W.J. Boettinger, U.R. Kattner, F.S. Biancaniello, and C.A. Handwerker, J. Electron. Mater. 29, 1122 (2000).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    D.R. Frear and P.T. Vianco, Metall. Trans. A 25A, 1509 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    W.K. Choi and H.M. Lee, J. Electron. Mater. 29, 10 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    A.J. Sunwoo, J.W. Morris Jr., and G.K. Lucey Jr., Metall. Trans. A 23A, 1323 (1992).ADSGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Z. Mei and J.W. Morris, J. Electron. Mater. 21, 599 (1992).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    F. Bartels, J.W. Morris Jr., G. Dalke, and W. Gust, J. Electron. Mater. 23, 787 (1994).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    H. Ma, T.-K. Lee, D.H. Kim, S.H. Kim, H.G. Park, and K.-C. Liu, IEEE 59th Electronic Components and Technology Conference (ECTC) (San Diego, May 2009).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    H. Ma, J.C. Suhling, P. Lall, and M.J. Bozack, Proceeding of the 56th Electronic Components and Technology Conference (San Diego, California, May 2006).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    C.-Y. Yu, T.-K. Lee, M. Tsai, K.-C. Liu, and J.-G. Duh, J. Electron. Mater., this volume (2010).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    T.-K. Lee, K.-C. Liu, and T.R. Bieler, J. Electron. Mater. 38, 2685 (2009).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    T.R. Bieler, T.-K. Lee, and K.-C. Liu, J. Electron. Mater. 38, 2712 (2009).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    B. Zhou, T.R. Bieler, T.-K. Lee, and K.-C. Liu, J. Electron. Mater. 38, 2702 (2009).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    T. Laurila, V. Vuorinen, and J.K. Kivilahti, Mater. Sci. Eng. R 49, 1 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© TMS 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tae-Kyu Lee
    • 1
  • Hongtao Ma
    • 1
  • Kuo-Chuan Liu
    • 1
  • Jie Xue
    • 1
  1. 1.Component Quality and Technology GroupCisco Systems, Inc.San JoseUSA

Personalised recommendations