Advertisement

Journal of Electronic Materials

, Volume 39, Issue 9, pp 1981–1986 | Cite as

Vapor Annealing as a Post-Processing Technique to Control Carrier Concentrations of Bi2Te3 Thin Films

  • Andrew Taylor
  • Clay Mortensen
  • Raimar Rostek
  • Ngoc Nguyen
  • David C. JohnsonEmail author
Article

This article demonstrates that carrier concentrations in bismuth telluride films can be controlled through annealing in controlled vapor pressures of tellurium. For the bismuth telluride source with a small excess of tellurium, all the films reached a steady state carrier concentration of 4 × 1019 carriers/cm3 with Seebeck coefficients of −170 μV K−1. For temperatures below 300°C and for film thicknesses of 0.4 μm or less, the rate-limiting step in reaching a steady state for the carrier concentration appeared to be the mass transport of tellurium through the gas phase. At higher temperatures, with the resulting higher pressures of tellurium or for thicker films, it was expected that mass transport through the solid would become rate limiting. The mobility also changed with annealing, but at a rate different from that of the carrier concentration, perhaps as a consequence of the non-equilibrium concentration of defects trapped in the films studied by the low temperature synthesis approach.

Keywords

Electronic properties thermoelectric materials thin films 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work was supported by the Office of Naval Research (N0014-07-1-0358). Clay Mortensen acknowledges support from an Integrative Graduate Education and Research Traineeship (IGERT) fellowship from the National Science Foundation, grant DGE-0549503.

References

  1. 1.
    H.J. Goldsmid, Electronic Refrigeration (London: Pion Limited, 1986).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    H. Noro, K. Sato, and H. Kagechika, J. Appl. Phys. 73, 1252 (1993).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. Goswami and S.S. Koli, Indian J. Pure Appl. Phys. 7, 166 (1969).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Y.H. Shing, Y. Chang, A. Mirshafii, L. Hayashi, S.S. Roberts, J.Y. Josefowicz, and N. Tran, J. Vac. Sci. Technol., A 1, 503 (1983).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. Jeflea, S. Melinte, and M. Moise, Alternative Energy Sources, Proceedings of the 6th Miami International Conference, 2, (1985), p. 307.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    H. Cui, I. Bhat, B. O’Quinn, and R. Venkatasubramanian, J. Electron. Mater. 30, 1376 (2001).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. George and B. Pradeep, Solid State Commun. 56, 117 (1985).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    E. Charles, E. Groubert, and A. Boyer, J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 7, 575 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Y.A. Boikov, O.S. Gribanova, V.A. Danilov, and V.A. Kutasov, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Neorg. Mater. 26, 1628, (1990).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    D.M. Rowe, CRC Handbook of Thermoelectrics (Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© TMS 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrew Taylor
    • 1
  • Clay Mortensen
    • 1
  • Raimar Rostek
    • 2
  • Ngoc Nguyen
    • 1
  • David C. Johnson
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Chemistry and Materials Science InstituteUniversity of OregonEugeneUSA
  2. 2.Thermoelektrische SystemeFraunhofer Institut für Physikalische MesstechnikFreiburgGermany

Personalised recommendations