Fundamental Study of the Intermixing of 95Pb-5Sn High-Lead Solder Bumps and 37Pb-63Sn Pre-Solder on Chip-Carrier Substrates
- 190 Downloads
- 6 Citations
Abstract
This study investigated the intermixing of 95Pb-5Sn solder bumps and 37Pb-63Sn pre-solder in flip-chip solder joints. The reaction conditions included multiple reflows (up to ten) at 240°C, whereby previously solder-coated parts are joined by heating without using additional solder. We found that the molten pre-solder had an irregular shape similar to a calyx (i.e., a cup-like structure) wrapped around a high-lead solder bump. The height to which the molten pre-solder ascended along the solid high-lead solder bump increased with the number of reflows. The molten pre-solder was able to reach the under bump metallurgy (UBM)/95Pb-5Sn interface after three to five reflows. The molten pre-solder at the UBM/95Pb-5Sn interface generated two important phenomena: (1) the molten solder dewetted (i.e., flowed away from the soldered surface) along the UBM/95Pb-5Sn interface, particularly when the number of reflows was high, and (2) the molten pre-solder transported Cu␣atoms to the UBM/95Pb-5Sn interface, which in turn caused the Ni-Sn compounds at the chip-side interface to change into (Cu0.6Ni0.4)6Sn5.
Keywords
High-lead solder composite solder flip chipPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.E.M. Davis, W.E. Harding, R.S. Schwartz, and J.J. Corning, IBM J. Res. Develop. 44, 56 (2000).Google Scholar
- 2.L.F. Miller, IBM J. Res. Develop. 13, 239 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.P.A. Totta and R.P. Sopher, IBM J. Res. Develop. 13, 226 (1969).Google Scholar
- 4.K.N. Tu and K. Zeng, Mater. Sci. Eng. R 34, 1 (2001). doi: 10.1016/S0927-796X(01)00029-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.C.E. Ho, Y.L. Lin, and C.R. Kao, Chem. Mater. 14, 949 (2002). doi: 10.1021/cm010639h.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.W.T. Chen, C.E. Ho, and C.R. Kao, J. Mater. Res. 17, 263 (2002). doi: 10.1557/JMR.2002.0036.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 7.C.E. Ho, R.Y. Tsai, Y.L. Lin, and C.R. Kao, J. Electron. Mater. 31, 584 (2002). doi: 10.1007/s11664-002-0129-0.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 8.C.M. Tsai, W.C. Luo, C.W. Chang, Y.C. Shieh, and C.R. Kao, J. Electron. Mater. 33, 1424 (2004). doi: 10.1007/s11664-004-0082-1.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 9.C.E. Ho, S.C. Yang, and C.R. Kao, J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 18, 155 (2007). doi: 10.1007/s10854-006-9031-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.A.J. Sunwoo, J.W. Morris, and G.K. Lucey, Metall. Trans. A 23, 1323 (1992). doi: 10.1007/BF02665064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.W. Yang, L.E. Felton, and R.W. Messler, J. Electron. Mater. 24, 1465 (1995). doi: 10.1007/BF02655465.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 12.S. Choi, T.R. Bieler, J.P. Lucas, and K.N. Subramanian, J.␣Electron. Mater. 28, 1209 (1999). doi: 10.1007/s11664-999-0159-y.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 13.Y.W. Wang, Y.W. Lin, C.T. Tu, and C.R. Kao, J. Alloys Compd. 478, 121 (2009). doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2008.11.052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Y.W. Wang, C.C. Chang, and C.R. Kao, J. Alloys Compd. 478, L1 (2009). doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2008.11.027.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 15.Y.W. Wang, Y.W. Lin, and C.R. Kao, Microelectron. Reliab. 49, 248 (2009). doi: 10.1016/j.microrel.2008.09.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.M.L. Huang, T. Loeher, A. Ostmann, and H. Reichl, Appl. Phys. Lett. 86, 181908 (2005). doi: 10.1063/1.1925317.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar