X-Ray Diffraction and Photoluminescence Studies of InN Grown by Plasma-Assisted Molecular Beam Epitaxy with Low Free-Carrier Concentration
- 120 Downloads
- 3 Citations
We report studies of InN grown by plasma-assisted molecular beam epitaxy. GaN templates were first grown on sapphire substrates followed by InN overgrown at 457°C to 487°C. Atomic force microscopy shows the best layers to exhibit step-flow growth mode of the InN, with a root-mean-square roughness of 0.7 nm for the 2 μm × 2 μm scan and 1.4 nm for the 5 μm × 5 μm scan.␣Measurements of the terrace edges indicate a step height of 0.28 nm. Hall measurements at room temperature give mobilities ranging from 1024 cm2/V s to 1904 cm2/V s and the electron concentrations are in the range of 5.9 × 1017 cm−3 to 4.2 × 1018 cm−3. Symmetric and asymmetric reflection x-ray diffraction measurements were performed to obtain lattice constants a␣and c. The corresponding hydrostatic and biaxial stresses are found to range from −0.08 GPa to −0.29 GPa, and −0.05 GPa to −0.32 GPa, respectively. Low-temperature photoluminescence peak energies range from 0.67 eV to 0.70 eV, depending on residual biaxial stress, hydrostatic pressure, and electron concentrations. The electron concentration dependence of the estimated Fermi level is analyzed using Kane’s two-band model and conduction-band renormalization effects.
Keywords
InN molecular beam epitaxy photoluminescencePreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.V.Y. Davydov, A.A. Klochikhin, R.P. Seisyan, V·V. Emtsev, S·V. Ivanov, F. Bechstedt, J. Furthmuller, H. Harima, V. Mudryi, J. Aderhold, O. Semchinova (2002) J. Graul. Phys. Status Solidi B 229, R1–R3. doi:10.1002/1521-3951(200202)229:3<R1::AID-PSSB99991>3.0.CO;2-OCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.J. Wu, W. Walukiewicz, W. Shan, K.M. Yu, J.W. Ager, E.E. Haller, H. Lu, W.J. Schaff (2002) Phys Rev B 66, 201403. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.66.201403 CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 3.Q.X. Guo, A. Yoshida. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 33, 2453 (1994) doi: 10.1143/JJAP.33.2453 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.T.V. Shubina, S.V. Ivanov, V.N. Jmerik, P.S. Kop'ev, A. Vasson, J. Leymarie, A. Kavokin, H. Amano, B. Gil, O. Briot, and B. Monemar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 117407 (2004).Google Scholar
- 5.D.Y. Song, V. Kuryatkov, M. Basavaraj, D. Rosenbladt, S.A. Nikishin, M. Holtz, A.L. Syrkin, A.S. Usikov, V.A. Ivantsov, V.A. Dmitriev. J. Appl. Phys. 99, 116103 (2006) doi: 10.1063/1.2201856 CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 6.D.Y. Song, M.E. Holtz, A. Chandolu, A. Bernussi, S.A. Nikishin, M.W. Holtz, and I. Gherasoiu, Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 121913 (2008).Google Scholar
- 7.J. Wu, W. Walukiewicz, K. M. Yu, W. Shan, J. W. Ager Iii, E. E. Haller, H. Lu, W. J. Schaff, W. K. Metzger, S. Kurtz. J. Appl. Phys. 94, 6477 (2003) doi: 10.1063/1.1618353 CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 8.R. Ascazubi, I. Wilke, K. Denniston, H. Lu, W.J. Schaff. Appl. Phys. Lett. 84, 4810 (2004) doi: 10.1063/1.1759385 CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 9.I. Ahmad, M. Holtz, N. Faleev, H. Temkin. J. Appl. Phys. 95, 1692 (2004) doi: 10.1063/1.1637707 CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 10.C. Kisielowski, J. Krüger, S. Ruvimov, T. Suski, J.W. Ager, E. Jones, Z. Liliental-Weber, M. Rubin, E.R. Weber, M.D. Bremser, R.F. Davis. Phys. Rev. B 54, 17745 (1996) doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.17745 CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 11.A. Kaminska, G. Franssen, T. Suski, I. Gorczyca, N.E. Christensen, A. Svane, A. Suchocki, H. Lu, W.J. Schaff, E. Dimakis, A. Georgakilas (2007) Phys. Rev. B 76, 5.Google Scholar
- 12.X.Q. Wang, S·B. Che, Y. Ishitani, A. Yoshikawa. J. Appl. Phys. 99, 073512 (2006) doi: 10.1063/1.2190720 CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 13.I. Gherasoiu, M. O’Steen, T. Bird, D. Gotthold, A. Chandolu, D.Y. Song, X. Xu, M. Holtz, S.A. Nikishin, W.J. Schaff. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 26, 7 (2008) doi: 10.1116/1.2899412 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.L.F.J. Piper, T.D. Veal, C·F. McConville, H. Lu, W.J. Schaff. Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 52109 (2006) doi: 10.1063/1.2214156 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.X.Q. Wang, S.B. Che, Y. Ishitani, and A. Yoshikawa, Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 171907 (2006).Google Scholar
- 16.G. Kipshidze, B. Yavich, A. Chandolu, J. Yun, V. Kuryatkov, I. Ahmad, D. Aurongzeb, M. Holtz, H. Temkin. Appl. Phys. Lett. 86, 33104 (2005) doi: 10.1063/1.1850188 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.V.M. Kaganer, O. Brandt, A. Trampert, and K.H. Ploog, Phys. Rev. B 72, 045423 (2005).Google Scholar
- 18.H. Heinke, V. Kirchner, S. Einfeldt, D. Hommel (1999) Phys. Status Solidi A 176, 391–395. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1521-396X(199911)176:1<391::AID-PSSA391>3.0.CO;2-ICrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 19.X.Q. Wang, S.B. Che, Y. Ishitani, and A. Yoshikawa, Appl. Phys. Lett. 90, 201913 (2007).Google Scholar
- 20.K. Wang, R.R. Reeber. Appl. Phys. Lett. 79, 1602 (2001) doi: 10.1063/1.1400082 CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 21.M. Leszczynski, T. Suski, H. Teisseyre, P. Perlin, I. Grzegory, J. Jun, S. Porowski, T.D. Moustakas. (1994) J. Appl. Phys. 76, 4909. doi: 10.1063/1.357273 CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 22.A.F. Wright (1997) J. Appl. Phys. 82, 2833. doi: 10.1063/1.366114 CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 23.S.P. Fu, Y.F. Chen (2004) Appl. Phys. Lett. 85, 1523. doi: 10.1063/1.1787615 CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 24.D.S. Jiang, Y. Makita, K. Ploog, H.J. Queisser. (1982) J. Appl. Phys. 53, 999. doi: 10.1063/1.330581 CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar