Journal of Electronic Materials

, Volume 34, Issue 8, pp 1177–1182 | Cite as

Cure shrinkage measurement of nonconductive adhesives by means of a thermomechanical analyzer

  • H. Yu
  • S. G. Mhaisalkar
  • E. H. Wong
Regular Issue Paper


The conductivity of a nonconductive adhesive (NCA) flip chip interconnect is completely dependent on the direct mechanical contact between the integrated circuit (IC) bump and substrate pad. Cure shrinkage of NCA is critical for the formation of the final contact force in the contacts. However, measurement of the cure shrinkage during cross-linking reaction is fairly difficult. This paper introduces a new, yet simple, approach to measure cure shrinkage of adhesives using a thermo-mechanical analyzer. Isothermal studies of shrinkage change as a function of curing show four distinct regions. First, the thickness of the epoxy decreases due to decreasing viscosity and applied load, followed by a stage where the dimension change is constant as the cross-linking reaction is yet to set in. Once cross-linking begins, the shrinkage reaches a maximum followed by a plateau where the cross-linking reaction has completed. Sharp changes of the slope of cure shrinkage versus degree of cure were observed to coincide with gelation and vitrification. After gelation, a linear relationship between the cure shrinkage and degree of cure was observed to extend until the occurrence of vitrification, which quenches the cross-linking reaction. Applied load in the range of 0.05 N was found to be optimal to minimize measurement errors.

Key words

Nonconductive adhesives (NCAs) flip chip cure shrinkage cure stress gelation vitrification 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    J. Liu, Microsyst. Technol. 5, 72 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    R.R. Braga and J.L. Ferracane, J. Dental Res. 81, 114 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    H. Ishida and H.Y. Low, Macromolecules 30, 1099 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    J.H. Lai and A.E. Johnson, Dental Mater. 9, 139 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    W.D. Cook, M. Forrest, and A.A. Goodwin, Dental Mater. 15, 447 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    C. Li, K. Potter, M.R. Wisnom, and G. Stringer, Compos. Sci. Technol. 64, 55 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    C.L. Thomas and A.J. Bur, Polymer Eng. Sci. 39, 1619 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    V. Fano, I. Ortalli, S. Pizzi, and M. Bonanini, Biomaterials, 18, 467 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    W.S. Kwon and K.W. Paik, Int. J. Adhesion Adhesives 24, 135 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    D. Lu and C.P. Wong, 1999 Int. Symp. Advanced Packaging Materials (Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, 1999), pp. 295–301.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    S. Rimdusit and H. Ishida, Rheol Acta, 41, 1–9 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    H. Yu, S.G. Mhaisalkar, E.H. Wong, L.K. Teh, and C.C. Wong, IEEE Trans. Compon. Packaging Technol. (in press).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    H. Yu, S.G. Mhaisalkar, and E.H. Wong, J. Mater. Res. 20, 1324 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    P. Prasatya, G.B. Mckenna, and S.L. Simon, J. Compos. Mater. 35, 826 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    B.S. Lim, J.L. Ferracane, R.L. Sakaguchi, and J.R. Condon, Dental Mater. 18, 436 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© TMS-The Minerals, Metals and Materials Society 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Yu
    • 1
  • S. G. Mhaisalkar
    • 1
  • E. H. Wong
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Materials Science and EngineeringNanyang Technological UniversitySingapore
  2. 2.MicroSystems, Modules & Components LabInstitute of MicroelectronicsSingapore

Personalised recommendations