Mg fluctuation in p-GaN layers and its effects on InGaN/GaN blue light-emitting diodes dependent on p-GaN growth temperature
- 195 Downloads
- 2 Citations
Abstract
Correlation between material properties of bulk p-GaN layers grown on undoped GaN and device performance of InGaN/GaN blue light-emitting diodes (LEDs) as a function of p-GaN growth temperature were investigated. The p-GaN layers of both structures grown by metal-organic chemical-vapor deposition were heavily doped with Mg. As the growth temperature of the bulk p-GaN layer increased up to 1,080°C, NA-ND increased. However, above 1,110°C, NA-ND sharply decreased, while the fluctuation of Mg concentration ([Mg]) increased. At this time, a peculiar surface, which originated from inversion domain boundaries (IDBs), was clearly observed in the bulk p-GaN layer. The IDBs were not found in all LEDs because the p-GaN contact layer was relatively thin. The change in photoluminescence emission from the ultraviolet band to blue band is found to be associated with the fluctuation of [Mg] and IDBs in bulk p-GaN layers. The LED operating voltage and reverse voltage improved gradually up to the p-GaN contact-layer growth temperature of 1,080°C. However, the high growth temperature of 1,110°C, which could favor the formation of IDBs in the bulk p-GaN layer, yielded poorer reverse voltage and saturated output power of the LEDs.
Key words
p-GaN Mg fluctuation light-emitting diodePreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.S. Nakamura, T. Mukai, M. Senoh, and N. Iwasa, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 31, L139 (1992).Google Scholar
- 2.P. Kozodoy, H. Xing, S.P. DenBaars, U.K. Mishra, A. Saxier, R. Perrin, S. Elhamari, and C. Mitchel, J. Appl. Phys. 87, 1832 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.L.T. Romano, M. Kneissl, J.E. Northrup, C.G. Van de Walle, and D.W. Trear, Appl. Phys. Lett. 79, 2734 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.U. Kaufmann, M. Kunzer, H. Obloh, M. Maier, A. Ramakrishnan, and B. Santic, Phys. Rev. B 59, 5561 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.M.A. Reshchikov, G.-C. Yi, and B.W. Wessels, Phys. Rev. B 59, 13176 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.C.S. Kim, H.K. Cho, C.-H. Hong, E.-K. Suh, and H.J. Lee, Phys. Status Solidi (c) 0, 2248 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.J. Neugebauer and C.G. Van de Walle, Proc. Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. 395, 645 (1995).Google Scholar
- 8.C.G. Van de Walle, C. Stampfl, and J. Neugebauer, J. Cryst. Growth 189, 505 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.U. Kaufmann, P. Schlotter, H. Obloh, K. Kohlwe, and M. Maier, Phys. Rev. B 63, 10867 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.F. Shahedipour and B.W. Wessels, Appl. Phys. Lett. 76, 3011 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Y. Koide, D.E. Walke Jr., B.D. White, L.J. Brillson, S. Kamiyama, H. Amano, and I. Akasaki, J. Appl. Phys. 92, 3657 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.M. Benaissa, P. Vennegues, B. Beaumont, P. Gibart, W. Saikaly, and A. Charai, Appl. Phys. Lett. 77, 2115 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.J.S. Kwak, O.-H. Nahm, and Y. Park, Appl. Phys. Lett. 80, 3554 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar