Journal of Electronic Materials

, Volume 33, Issue 5, pp 445–449 | Cite as

Mg fluctuation in p-GaN layers and its effects on InGaN/GaN blue light-emitting diodes dependent on p-GaN growth temperature

  • C. S. Kim
  • H. K. Cho
  • M. K. Yoo
  • H. S. Cheong
  • C. -H. Hong
  • H. K. Cho
Special Issue Paper

Abstract

Correlation between material properties of bulk p-GaN layers grown on undoped GaN and device performance of InGaN/GaN blue light-emitting diodes (LEDs) as a function of p-GaN growth temperature were investigated. The p-GaN layers of both structures grown by metal-organic chemical-vapor deposition were heavily doped with Mg. As the growth temperature of the bulk p-GaN layer increased up to 1,080°C, NA-ND increased. However, above 1,110°C, NA-ND sharply decreased, while the fluctuation of Mg concentration ([Mg]) increased. At this time, a peculiar surface, which originated from inversion domain boundaries (IDBs), was clearly observed in the bulk p-GaN layer. The IDBs were not found in all LEDs because the p-GaN contact layer was relatively thin. The change in photoluminescence emission from the ultraviolet band to blue band is found to be associated with the fluctuation of [Mg] and IDBs in bulk p-GaN layers. The LED operating voltage and reverse voltage improved gradually up to the p-GaN contact-layer growth temperature of 1,080°C. However, the high growth temperature of 1,110°C, which could favor the formation of IDBs in the bulk p-GaN layer, yielded poorer reverse voltage and saturated output power of the LEDs.

Key words

p-GaN Mg fluctuation light-emitting diode 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    S. Nakamura, T. Mukai, M. Senoh, and N. Iwasa, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 31, L139 (1992).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    P. Kozodoy, H. Xing, S.P. DenBaars, U.K. Mishra, A. Saxier, R. Perrin, S. Elhamari, and C. Mitchel, J. Appl. Phys. 87, 1832 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    L.T. Romano, M. Kneissl, J.E. Northrup, C.G. Van de Walle, and D.W. Trear, Appl. Phys. Lett. 79, 2734 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    U. Kaufmann, M. Kunzer, H. Obloh, M. Maier, A. Ramakrishnan, and B. Santic, Phys. Rev. B 59, 5561 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    M.A. Reshchikov, G.-C. Yi, and B.W. Wessels, Phys. Rev. B 59, 13176 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    C.S. Kim, H.K. Cho, C.-H. Hong, E.-K. Suh, and H.J. Lee, Phys. Status Solidi (c) 0, 2248 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. Neugebauer and C.G. Van de Walle, Proc. Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. 395, 645 (1995).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    C.G. Van de Walle, C. Stampfl, and J. Neugebauer, J. Cryst. Growth 189, 505 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    U. Kaufmann, P. Schlotter, H. Obloh, K. Kohlwe, and M. Maier, Phys. Rev. B 63, 10867 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    F. Shahedipour and B.W. Wessels, Appl. Phys. Lett. 76, 3011 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Y. Koide, D.E. Walke Jr., B.D. White, L.J. Brillson, S. Kamiyama, H. Amano, and I. Akasaki, J. Appl. Phys. 92, 3657 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    M. Benaissa, P. Vennegues, B. Beaumont, P. Gibart, W. Saikaly, and A. Charai, Appl. Phys. Lett. 77, 2115 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    J.S. Kwak, O.-H. Nahm, and Y. Park, Appl. Phys. Lett. 80, 3554 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© TMS-The Minerals, Metals and Materials Society 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. S. Kim
    • 1
  • H. K. Cho
    • 1
  • M. K. Yoo
    • 1
  • H. S. Cheong
    • 1
  • C. -H. Hong
    • 1
  • H. K. Cho
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Semiconductor Science and TechnologyChonbuk National UniversityChonjuKorea
  2. 2.Department of MetallurgicalEngineering Dong-A UniversityBusanKorea

Personalised recommendations