A novel structure of woven continuous-carbon fiber composites with high electromagnetic shielding
- 219 Downloads
- 13 Citations
Abstract
A novel structure employing the woven continuous-carbon fiber (CCF) epoxy composite with high electromagnetic (EM) shielding is presented experimentally and theoretically. The influences of weave type, number, and angle of overlapped plates upon the shielding effectiveness (SE) of the woven CCF-epoxy composite are investigated. The minimum SE of the single, double, and triple-plain or balanced-twill woven CCF-composite plates was measured to be as high as 50 dB, 60 dB, and 70 dB, respectively. More than 100 dB in SE was obtained for the triple-overlapped, plain-weave CCF composite at a frequency of 0.9 GHz. The weight percentage of the single CCF-composite plate required for electronic application is 4.8% only, which is less than one quarter of the CF content, and the performance in SE is 10 dB higher in comparison with long, CF-filled, liquid-crystal polymer (LCP) composites. The SE calculated theoretically is consistent with that measured by the experiment.
Key words
Electromagnetic shielding shielding effectiveness continuous carbon fiber unidirection plain weave balanced-twill weave epoxy compositesPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.W.S. Jou, T.L. Wu, S.K. Chiu, and W.H. Cheng, J. Electron. Mater. 31, 178 (2002).Google Scholar
- 2.W.S. Jou, T.L. Wu, S.K. Chiu, and W.H. Cheng, J. Electron. Mater. 30, 1287 (2001).Google Scholar
- 3.T.-L. Wu, W.-S. Jou, S.G. Dai, and W.-H. Cheng, IEEE/OSA J. Lightwave Technol. 21, 1536 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.H. Mori, S. Tamura, A. Izawa, and M. Iwase, Optical Fiber Communication Conf. (Washington, DC: Optical Society of America, 1999), p. 198.Google Scholar
- 5.K. Tatsuno, K. Yoshida, T. Kato, T. Hirataka, T. Miura, K. Fukuda, T. Ishikawa, M. Shimaoka, and T. Ishii, J. Lightwave Technol. 17, 1211 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.M. Fukuda et al., J. Lightwave Technol. 17, 1585 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.W.H. Cheng, J.Y. Cheng, T.L. Wu, C.M. Wang, S.C. Wang, and W.S. Jou, Electron. Lett. 36, 118 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.D.M. Bigg and D.E. Stutz, Polym. Composites 4, 40 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.J.E. Theberge, Plast. Design Process. 20, 40 (1980).Google Scholar
- 10.G. Woodham and S. Gerteisen, Pacific Technical Conf. and Technical Displays (SPE), VI, 56 (1980).Google Scholar
- 11.A.M. Litman and D.M. Staggs, Plast. Design Forum 6, 68 (1981).Google Scholar
- 12.L.X. Cheng and D.D.L. Chung, Composites Part B: Eng. 30, 3 (1999).Google Scholar
- 13.N.F. Colaneri and L.W. Schacklette, IEEE Trans. Instr. Meas. 41, 291 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.D.R.J. White, EMI/EMC Handbook Series (New York: Don White Consultants, Inc., 1971), p. 4.Google Scholar
- 15.R. Bailey and B. Rzepka, International Polymer Processing VI (Munich, Germany: Hanser Publishers, 1991), pp. 35–41.Google Scholar
- 16.M. Sanout, B. Chung, and C. Cohen, Polym. Eng. Sci. 25, 1008 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.P.F. Bright, R.J. Crownson, and M.J. Folkes, J. Mater. Sci. 13, 2479 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.M. Fujiama and H. Awaya, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1, 3291 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.M.R. Hantz and H.D. Newman, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 16, 1249 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.G. Lubin, ed., Handbook of Composites (New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, Co., 1982), pp. 679–698.Google Scholar
- 21.D.M. Bigg, Polym. Composites 4, 40 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.D.M. Bigg, Polym. Composites 8, 1 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.ASTM, Standard Testing Method for Measuring the Electromagnetic Shielding Effectiveness of Planer Materials, ASTM D4935-92 (Philadelphia, PA: ASTM, 1992).Google Scholar