Kinetics of Copper Removal from Sulfidized Molybdenite Concentrates by Pressure Leaching
- 297 Downloads
- 1 Citations
Abstract
Molybdenite concentrates produced from porphyry copper deposits contain copper as an impurity in variable quantities. To produce a high-grade molybdenite concentrate, a chemical purification method is normally practiced. In this paper, a new alternative for the copper elimination from molybdenite concentrates containing chalcopyrite by sulfidation of the molybdenite concentrate and subsequent pressure leaching in sulfuric acid-oxygen media is discussed. The results indicated that copper contained in sulfidized molybdenite concentrates can be dissolved effectively by pressure leaching at low temperature ranging from 373 K to 423 K (100 °C to 150 °C) and low oxygen pressure (303.98 to 1013.25 kPa) with negligible dissolution of molybdenum. The final molybdenite contained less than 0.2 pct Cu which is appropriate for marketing. Temperature and oxygen partial pressure have both significant influence on the copper dissolution. The kinetics of the copper dissolution was analyzed using the shrinking core model with surface chemical control. The calculated activation energy was 51 kJ/mol in the range of 373 K to 423 K (100 °C to 150 °C). The copper dissolution rate is of zero order with respect to hydrogen ion concentration, and first order with respect to oxygen partial pressure.
Keywords
Pyrite Chalcopyrite Oxygen Partial Pressure MoS2 MolybdeniteNotes
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge the National Fund for Scientific and Technological Development, FONDECYT, of Chile for the financial support of this study through Project No. 1110590.
References
- 1.P.H. Hennings, R.W. Stanley, and H.L. Ames: in Proceedings of Second International Symposium on Hydrometallurgy, D.J.I. Evans, ed., AIME, New York, 1973, p. 868.Google Scholar
- 2.R. R. Dorfler, J.M. Laferty: JOM, 1981, vol. 33(5), pp. 48-54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.C. K. Gupta: Extractive Metallurgy of Molybdenum, CRC Press Inc. Boca Raton, Fl, 1992.Google Scholar
- 4.M.C. Ruiz and R. Padilla: Hydrometallurgy, 1998, vol. 48 (3), pp.313-325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.I. Wilkomirsky and J. Aravena: in Proceeding of the Copper 91-Cobre 91 International Symposium, C. Diaz, J. Roy, P.J. Mackey, and G.P. Taylor, eds., CIM, Ottawa, 1991, pp. 18–21.Google Scholar
- 6.P. Romano, M.L. Blázquez, F.J. Alguacil, J.A. Muñoz, A. Ballester and F. González: FEMS Microbiology Letters, 2001, 196 (1), pp. 71-75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.M.A. Askari Zamani, R. Vaghar and M. Oliazadeh: Int. J. Miner. Process. 81 (2006), pp. 105-112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.P.A. Bloom and S.J. Hussey: U.S. Patent 3,714,325, Jan. 30, 1973.Google Scholar
- 9.R. Padilla M. Rodríguez, M.C. Ruiz: Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B, 2003, vol. 34B, pp.15-23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.R. Padilla, E. Olivares, M.C. Ruiz and Y.H. Sohn: Metallurgical and Materials transactions B, 2003, vol. 34B, pp. 61-68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.L.A. Neumeier and M.J. Adam: in Process Mineralogy, W. Petruk and R.D. Hagni, eds., The Minerals, Metals and Materials Society, Warrendale, PA, 1990, pp 311–22.Google Scholar
- 12.R. Padilla, H. Letelier, M.C. Ruiz: Hydrometallurgy, 2013, vol. 137, pp. 78-83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.C.Y. Cheng and F. Lawson: Hydrometallurgy, 1991, vol. 27, pp. 249-68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.R. Padilla, P. Pavez, M.C. Ruiz: Hydrometallurgy, 2008, vol. 91, pp. 113-120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.K. Jiang, Y. Wang, X. Zou, L. Shang and S. Liu: JOM, 2012, vol. 64 (11), pp. 1285-1289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.R. Padilla, D. Vega and M.C. Ruiz: Hydrometallurgy, 2007, vol. 86, pp. 80-88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.R. G. MacDonald and D.M. Muir: Hydrometallurgy, 2007, vol. 86, pp. 206-220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.H.Y. Sohn and M.E. Wadsworth: Rate Processes of Extractive Metallurgy, Plenum Press, New York, NY, 1979.Google Scholar