A Novel, Inexpensive, and Rugged Probe for Measuring Gas Bubbles in Liquid Metals: Part I. Mathematical Modeling and Laboratory Experiments
- 125 Downloads
Gas bubbles play an important role in many liquid metal processing operations. An important example is the “gas fluxing” of aluminum, where a gas, such as an argon-chlorine mixture, is injected into the liquid metal to remove impurities. A proper understanding of the behavior of units such as these is dependent on knowing how the bubbles are dispersed in the metal; other information such as the frequency of occurrence of bubbles at various points in the system would also be useful. Various bubble probes have been used in the past (including a “capacitance probe” developed for this purpose at Berkeley), but all seem to be prone to problems such as attack by the metal, susceptibility to electrical noise, mechanical weakness, high cost, etc. The present article describes a simple and rugged probe consisting of a narrow ceramic tube inserted into the metal at the point of interest and connected at its other end to an inert gas supply. Small bubbles are created at the immersed end of the tube, and the formation of these bubbles is heard by an inexpensive microphone in the gas supply line. These small bubbles, henceforth “probe bubbles,” are not the bubbles to be measured. The latter are much larger, and, as they pass up over the immersed end of the probe, these large bubbles change the sound of the probe bubble formation. The microphone is connected to a sound card in a computer so that the arrival of a large bubble at the probe location is readily recorded. The phenomena involved in this probe have been examined in water using high speed digital movies.
KeywordsParticle Image Velocimetry Liquid Metal Pressure Fluctuation Small Bubble Large Bubble
The costs of this investigation were met by the funds of the P. Malozemoff Chair at UC, Berkeley. The help of Dr. Sven Eck, University of Leoben, with the PIV is gratefully acknowledged.
- 1.M. Iguchi, T. Chihara, N. Takanashi, Y. Oqawa, N. Tokumitsu, Z.I. Morita: ISIJ Int., 1995, vol. 35 (11), pp. 1354–61Google Scholar
- 4.Q.A. Fu, J.W. Evans: ISIJ Int., 1999, vol. 39 (4), pp. 309–18Google Scholar
- 5.A.J. Fjeld, J.W. Evans, and N. Mittal: TMS Light Met., 2003, pp. 909–13Google Scholar
- 6.E.O. Hoefele and J.K. Brimacombe: Metall. Trans. B, 1979, vol. 10B, pp. 631–48; J.K. Brimacombe and G.N. Oryall: Metall. Trans. B, 1976, vol. 7, pp. 391–403Google Scholar
- 8.M. Paneni, W.G. Davenport: Trans. TMS-AIME, 1969, vol. 245 (4), pp. 735–38Google Scholar
- 9.F.D. Richardson: Metall. Trans., 1971, vol. 2, pp. 2747–56Google Scholar
- 15.G.K. Sigworth, T.A. Engh: Scand. J. Metall., 1982, vol. 11, pp. 143–49Google Scholar
- 17.J. Szekeley, N.J. Themelis: Rate Phenomena in Process Metallurgy, John Wiley, New York, NY, 1971, pp.688–98Google Scholar