A computational and experimental study on mold filling
- 234 Downloads
- 15 Citations
Abstract
Mold filling was studied for vertical, thin, plate-shaped cavities, with the liquid entering via some vertical ingate system connected to the bottom. In this study, sand molds were filled up with molten aluminum and molten cast iron, while water was used to fill up perspex models.
The front walls of the sand molds were replaced by glass plates to allow observations of temperature distributions and free-surface behavior of the melt during filling. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations of the filling process were carried out to study free-surface behavior, velocity patterns, and temperature distributions. Digital particle-image velocimetry (DPIV) was used to validate the computer simulations for water.
Generally, visual observations of the molten liquids, CFD simulations, and DPIV results are in good agreement. Combining the three techniques has resulted in a better understanding as to how a plate-shaped cavity is filled up.
The behavior of the free surface is different for water and the molten metals. An analysis of surface waves is presented that explains these differences. Current ideas as to the role of the Weber number must be rejected. Rather, instabilities are associated with low values of the Ohnesorge number, with surface tension providing the driving force for surface instabilities and with viscosity as the damping force.
Keywords
Material Transaction Computational Fluid Dynamic Cast Iron Computational Fluid Dynamic Simulation Light SheetPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.R.E. Swift, J.H. Jackson, and L.W. Eastwood: AFS Trans., 1949, vol. 57, pp. 76–88.Google Scholar
- 2.D.S. Richins and W.O Wetmore: AFS Symp. Principles on Gating, 1951, pp. 1–24, Buffalo, N.Y., publisher: Chicago: AFS.Google Scholar
- 3.M. Jeancolas, G.C. de Lara, and H. Hanf: AFS Trans., 1962, vol. 70, pp. 503–12.Google Scholar
- 4.W.E. Smith and J.F. Wallace: “Gatings of Castings,” AFS Report, Case Institute of Technology Cleveland, Des Plaines, IL, 1965.Google Scholar
- 5.M. Brezina and V. Kondic: Br. Found., 1973, vol. 66, pp. 337–48.Google Scholar
- 6.J. Campbell: Castings, Butterworth-Heineman Ltd., London, 1991.Google Scholar
- 7.W.S. Hwang and R.A. Stoehr: AFS Trans., 1987, vol. 95, pp. 425–30.Google Scholar
- 8.K.A. Minaie, K.A. Stelson, and V.R. Voller: J. Eng. Mater. Technol. (ASME), 1991, vol. 113, pp. 296–302.Google Scholar
- 9.C. Wang: Ph.D. Thesis, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 1990.Google Scholar
- 10.A. Couniot, L. Dheur, and F. Dupret: in Cross et al.[34], pp. 381–398.Google Scholar
- 11.J.F.T. Pittman and A.O. Sharif: in Cross et al.[34], pp. 357–380.Google Scholar
- 12.Z.A. Xu and F. Mampaey: in Piwonka et al., [35] pp. 485–88.Google Scholar
- 13.J. Campbell: Br. Found., 1969, vol. 62, pp. 147–158.Google Scholar
- 14.H.N. Niewswaag: Gietwerkperspectief, 1988, vol. 6, pp. 7–14 (in Dutch).Google Scholar
- 15.G.B. Van der Graaf: Ph.D. Thesis, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands, 1995.Google Scholar
- 16.F.H. Harlow and J.E. Welch: “The MAC Method: a Computing Technique for Solving Viscous, Incompressible, Transient Fluid Flow Problems Involving Free Surface,” Report No. LA-3425, Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, 1965.Google Scholar
- 17.H.J. Lin and W.S. Hwang: AFS Trans., 1989, vol. 97, pp. 855–62.Google Scholar
- 18.B.D. Nichols, C.W Hirt, and R.S. Hotchkiss: “SOLA-VOF; a Solution Algorithm for Transient Fluid Flow with Multiple Free Boundaries.” Report No. LA-8355, Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, 1980.Google Scholar
- 19.B.D. Nichols and C.W. Hirt: J. Comp. Phys., 1981, vol. 39, pp. 201–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.W.S. Hwang and R.A. Stoehr: Mater. Sci. Technol., 1988, vol. 4, pp. 240–50.Google Scholar
- 21.M. Barkhudarov, H. You, J. Beech, S.B. Chin, and D.H. Kirkwood: EPD Congr., TMS, Warrendale, PA, 1992, pp. 595–603.Google Scholar
- 22.M. Barkhudarov, H. You, J. Ortega, J. Beech, S.B. Chin, and D.H. Kirkwood: in Piwonka et al., [35] pp. 421–34.Google Scholar
- 23.R.J. Wilson: Met. Rev., 1965, vol. 10, pp. 381–590.Google Scholar
- 24.M.J. McCarthy and N.A. Molloy: Chem. Eng. J., 1974, vol. 7, pp. 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.S. Middleman: Fundamentals of Polymer Processing, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, NY, 1977.Google Scholar
- 26.P.K. Kundu: Fluid Mechanics, Academic Press Inc., New York, NY, 1990.Google Scholar
- 27.R.J. Adrian: Appl. Optics, 1984, vol. 23, pp. 1690–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.J. Westerweel: Ph.D. Thesis, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands, 1993.Google Scholar
- 29.J.M. Coupland and C.J.D. Pickering: Optics Lasers Eng., 1988, vol. 9, pp. 201–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.R.D. Keane and R.J. Adrian: Meas. Sci. Technol., 1990, vol. 1, pp. 1202–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.S. Elghobashi: Appl. Sci. Res., 1994, vol. 52, pp. 309–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.C. Gray, C.A. Greated, D.R. McClusty, and W.J. Easson: Meas. Sci. Technol. 1991, vol. 2, pp. 717–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 33.J. Westerweel: Exp. Fluids, 1994, vol. 16, pp. 236–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.Mathematical Modeling for Materials Processing, M. Cross, J. Pittman, and R. Wood, eds., Clarendon Press, Oxford, United Kingdom, 1993.Google Scholar
- 35.Modeling of Casting, Welding and Advanced Solidification Processes, T.S. Piwonka, V. Voller, and L. Katgerman, eds., TMS, Warrendale, PA, 1993, vol. 6.Google Scholar