Role of cold work and SiC reinforcements on the β′/β precipitation in Al-10 pct Mg alloy
- 109 Downloads
- 15 Citations
Abstract
Elevated temperature (above 100 °C) precipitation behaviors were studied in A1-10 wt pct Mg alloy and the same alloy reinforced with SiC particles through electrical resistivity, hardness, differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), and microscopy. Two distinct hardness peaks/resistivity drops, as associated with two precipitation events, were identified: (1) α (solid solution) → β′ (metastable hex precipitate) → β (Al3Mg2, stable complex cubic precipitate); and (2) α → β. Equilibrium β precipitates, transformed from metastable β′, were observed to possess a wide variet of orientation relationships with the matrix and were often observed to be twinned. A more restricted orientation relationship (only three variants) between β and matrix was observed in direct decomposition of α to β, and β precipitates, within these orientation relationships, were never observed to be twinned. In a predominantly binary Al-Mg system, direct precipitation of β was observed to dominate. However, the presence of trace amounts of boron nitride and/or boron (or a large supply of matrix dislocations) either from cold work, or (as in case of composites) from the thermal mismatch between the SiC and Al matrix, produced both precipitation events with event 1 dominant.
Keywords
Differential Scanning Calorimetry Material Transaction Boron Nitride Orientation Relationship Heat EvolutionPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Aluminum: Properties and Physical Metallurgy, J.E. Hatch, ed., ASM, Metals Park, OH, 1993.Google Scholar
- 2.L.F. Mondolfo: Aluminum Alloys: Structure and Properties, Butterworth, and Co., London, 1976, pp. 312–23.Google Scholar
- 3.A. Kelly and R.B. Nicholson: Progr. Mater. Sci., Pergamon Press, London, 1963, vol. 10, pp. 209–11.Google Scholar
- 4.S. Samson: Acta Cryst., 1965, vol. 19, p. 401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.T. Sato and A. Kamio: Mater. Sci. Eng., 1991, vol. A146, pp. 161–80.Google Scholar
- 6.T. Sato, Y. Kojima, and T. Takashi: Metall. Trans. A, 1982, vol. 13A, pp. 1373–78.Google Scholar
- 7.K. Osamura and T. Ogura: Metall. Trans. A, 1984, vol. 15A, pp. 835–42.Google Scholar
- 8.M. Van Rooyen, J.A. Sinte Maarensdijk, and E.J. Mittemeijer: Metall. Trans. A, 1988, vol. 19A, pp. 2433–43.Google Scholar
- 9.S. Nebti, D. Hamana, and G. Cizeron: Acta Metall. Mater., 1995, vol. 43, pp. 3583–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.C. Panseri, T. Federighi, and S. Ceresara: Trans. AIME, 1963, vol. 227, pp. 1122–26.Google Scholar
- 11.Y. Kojima, T. Takahashi, M. Kubo, and T. Moringa: Metall. Trans. A, 1981, vol. 12A, pp. 1113–17.Google Scholar
- 12.W.A. Pollard: J. Inst. Met., 1964, vol. 93, p. 339.Google Scholar
- 13.T. Mukai, K. Higashi, and S. Tanimura: Mater. Sci. Eng., 1994, vol. A176, pp. 181–89.Google Scholar
- 14.N.R.M.R. Bhargava, I. Samajdar, S. Ranganathan, and M.K. Surappa: Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, Ph.D Thesis, 1997.Google Scholar
- 15.S. Suresh and K.K. Chawla: in Fundamentals of MMCs, S. Suresh, A. Mortensen, and A. Needleman, eds., Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston, MA, 1993, pp. 119–36.Google Scholar
- 16.C. Badini, F. Marino, and E. Verne: Mater Sci. Eng., 1995, vol. A191, pp. 185–91.Google Scholar
- 17.H. Lee, W. Lu, and S.L. Chan: Scripta Metall. Mater., 1992, vol. 26, pp. 1723–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.M.J. Starink and P. Van Mourik: Metall. Trans. A, 1991, vol. 22A, pp. 665–74.Google Scholar
- 19.I. Dutta, C.P. Harper, and G. Dutta: Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 1994, vol. 25A, pp. 1591–1602.Google Scholar
- 20.B. Dutta and M.K. Surappa: Scripta Metall. Mater., 1995, vol. 32, p. 731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.J.W. Martin and R.D. Doherty: Stability of Microstructures in Metallic Systems, Cambridge University Press, London, 1976.Google Scholar
- 22.D.A. Porter and K.E. Easterling: Phase Transformations in Metals And alloys, T.J. Press Ltd., Cornwell, United Kingdom, 1989.Google Scholar
- 23.H.R. Shercliff and M.F. Ashby: Acta Metall. Mater., 1990, vol. 38, pp. 1789–1802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.G.C. Weatherly and R.B. Nicohlson: Phil. Mag., 1968, vol. 16, pp. 801–31.Google Scholar
- 25.M.F. Komarov et al.: Fiz. Met. Metalloved., 1966, vol. 21 (6), pp. 858–67.Google Scholar
- 26.L.I. Kaygorodova, N.N. Buynov, and M.F. Komarova: Fiz. Met. Metalloved., 1982, vol. 54 (3), pp. 542–47.Google Scholar
- 27.N.N. Buynov and L.I. Kaygorodova: Fiz. Met. Metalloved., 1985, vol. 59 (1), pp. 91–95.Google Scholar
- 28.J.W. Cahn and G. Kalonji: Solid State Phase Transformation, H.I. Aaronson, D.E. Laughlin, R.F. Sekerka, and C.M. Wayman, eds. AIME, Warrendale, PA, 1981, pp. 3–14.Google Scholar
- 29.N. Kuwano et al.: ICOMAT-86, Japan Institute of Metals, Sendai, 1987, pp. 355–58.Google Scholar
- 30.H.C. Montgomery: J. Appl. Phys., 1971, vol. 42, p. 2971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar