Microstructural and Mechanical Properties Examination of High-Power Diode Laser-Treated R260 Grade Rail Steels Under Different Processing Temperatures
- 18 Downloads
In the present study, high-power diode laser surface treatment was implemented to R260 grade steel with three different processing temperatures (1100 °C, 1200 °C, and 1300 °C) at the laser power of 1750 W and scanning speed of 6 mm/s, in order to identify the effect of various processing temperatures on the mechanical performance. According to the test results, the laser-treated sample at 1300 °C showed much better mechanical performance among the other laser-treated samples. It was found that the laser-treated sample at 1300 °C had about 3 times more surface hardness, a 43 pct increase in yield strength, and a 53 pct increase in toughness value compared to the untreated sample. Microstructural investigations showed that this surface treatment did not only generate a martensitic structure with a certain depth but also provided the formation of a fine pearlitic structure contributing to an increase in the mechanical properties. As a conclusion, it was found that the processing temperature is one of the critical factors affecting the mechanical properties in the laser hardening process. Moreover, the results demonstrated that this treatment method might be an alternative method to enhance the mechanical properties of existing rail steels online without the need for rail disassembly, reducing operational costs.
This study was supported by the Research Fund of Istanbul University (Project No. 49081). The authors thank Professor Dr. Murat Baydogan, Associate Professor Derya Dispinar, Research Assistant Faiz Muhaffel, Cihat Bertan Berdanoglu, and Matil Materials Testing and Innovation Laboratories Co.
- 2.Laser Institute of America: Handbook of Laser Materials Processing, Magnolia Publishing Inc., Pineville, 2001.Google Scholar
- 4.S. Bonss, M. Seifert, B. Brenner, and E. Beyer: Proc. SPIE, 2003, vol. 4973.Google Scholar
- 9.M. Wiechec, B. Baker, T. McNelley, M. Matthews, A. Rubenchick, M. Rotter, R. Wu, and S. Beach: World J. Eng. Technol., 2017, vol. 5, pp. 97–112.Google Scholar
- 13.E. Kennedy, G. Byrne, and D.N. Collins: J. Mater. Process, 2004, vol. 1855, pp. 155–56.Google Scholar
- 17.B. Leibinger: Werkzeug Laser, Ein Lichtstrahl erobert die industrielle Fertigung, Vogel Buchverlag Wurzburg, 1. Airflage, 2006.Google Scholar
- 19.O. Yazici: Ph.D. Thesis, Institute of Sciences, Istanbul University, Istanbul, 2018.Google Scholar
- 20.O. Yazici and S. Yilmaz: 18th Int. Metallurgy & Materials Congr. Proc. Book, Istanbul, 2016, pp. 982–85.Google Scholar
- 23.A. Claire, O. Oyelola, J. Falkes, and P. Farayibi: J. Las. Appl., 2012, vol. 24, p. 3.Google Scholar
- 34.M. Tomicic-Torlakovic: Metalurgıja, 2014, vol. 53 (4), pp. 717–20.Google Scholar
- 35.Online database: Railroad Forums (Railroad Net, 2014), http://www.rairoad.net/forums/viewtopic.php. Accessed 9 Oct 2017.
- 36.Online document: Innotrack, Guidelines for management of rail grinding (Voestalpine, 2017), https://www.voestalpine.com/schienen/static/sites/schienen/.downloads/Definitive_guidelines_on_the_use_of_different_rail_grades_xINNOTRACK_deliverable_report_D4._1.5GLx_nur_in_Englisch_verfuegbarx.pdf. Accessed 10 Oct 2017.
- 37.European Committee for Standardization: EN 13674-1:2011+A1, 2017, Railway applications-Track-Rail-Part 1: Vignole railway rails 46 kg/m and above.Google Scholar
- 38.“Standard Test Methods for Notched Bar Impact Testing of Metallic Materials,” E23-12C, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.Google Scholar