Surface Integrity and Structural Stability of Broached Inconel 718 at High Temperatures
- 364 Downloads
The current study focused on the surface integrity issues associated with broaching of Inconel 718 and the structural stability of the broached specimen at high temperatures, mainly involving the microstructural changes and residual stress relaxation. The broaching operation was performed using similar cutting conditions as that used in turbo machinery industries for machining fir-tree root fixings on turbine disks. Thermal exposure was conducted at 723 K, 823 K, and 923 K (450 °C, 550 °C, and 650 °C) for 30, 300, and 3000 hours, respectively. Surface cavities and debris dragging, sub-surface cracks, high intensity of plastic deformation, as well as the generation of tensile residual stresses were identified to be the main issues in surface integrity for the broached Inconel 718. When a subsequent heating was applied, surface recrystallization and α-Cr precipitation occurred beneath the broached surface depending on the applied temperature and exposure time. The plastic deformation induced by the broaching is responsible for these microstructural changes. The surface tension was completely relaxed in a short time at the temperature where surface recrystallization occurred. The tensile layer on the sub-surface, however, exhibited a much higher resistance to the stress relief annealing. Oxidation is inevitable at high temperatures. The study found that the surface recrystallization could promote the local Cr diffusion on the broached surface.
KeywordsResidual Stress Oxide Scale Compressive Residual Stress Surface Integrity White Layer
The authors would like to thank Ms. Annethe Billenius from Linköping University, for the help with the laboratory work, Agora Materiae, Faculty Grant SFO-MAT-LiU#2009-00971 at Linköping University, Siemens Industrial Turbomachinery AB for their valuable supports.
- 1.D.F. Paulonis, J.M. Oblak, and D.S. Duvall: Trans. Quart. ASM, 1969, vol. 62, pp. 611-622.Google Scholar
- 2.J.W. Brooks and P.J. Bridges: Superalloys, pp. 33-42, TMS, Warrendale, 1988.Google Scholar
- 20.N.F. Suchkov and V.N. Latyshev: Machines Tooling, 1973, vol. 44, pp. 49-50.Google Scholar
- 24.R.J. Kamaladasa and Y.N. Picard: Microscopy, 2010, pp. 1583–90.Google Scholar
- 25.I.C. Noyan and J.B. Cohen: Residual stress measurement by diffraction and interpretation, pp. 117-130, Springer-Verlag New York Inc., New York, 1986.Google Scholar
- 27.M.C. Shaw: Metal Cutting Principles, pp. 432-479, Oxford University Press, New York, 2005.Google Scholar
- 29.J.M. Zhou, V. Bushlya, R.L. Peng, and J.E. Ståhl: Appl. Mech. Mater., 2012, vol. 117, pp. 1681-1688.Google Scholar
- 32.P.S. Prevéy: Residual Stress in Design, Process and Materials Selections, pp. 11-19, ASM Metals Park, OH, 1987.Google Scholar
- 35.O. Vöhringer: Advances in Surface Treatments, Technology-Applications-Effects, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1987, vol. 4, pp. 367-396.Google Scholar
- 37.Z. Chen, R.L. Peng, P. Avdovic, J.M. Zhou, J. Moverare, F. Karlsson, and S. Johansson: MATEC Web of Conferences, vol. 14, no. 08002, pp. 1–6, EDP Sciences, 2014.Google Scholar