Mechanical Behavior of Nano-crystalline Metallic Thin Films and Multilayers Under Microcompression
- 287 Downloads
- 3 Citations
Abstract
Microcompression tests were performed to determine the mechanical behavior of nano-crystalline Cu/Fe and Fe/Cu multilayers, as well as monolithic Cu and Fe thin films. The results show that the micropillars of pure Cu thin film bulge out under large compressive strains without failure, while those of pure Fe thin film crack near the top at low compressive strains followed by shear failure. For Cu/Fe and Fe/Cu multilayers, the Cu layers accommodate the majority of plastic deformation, and the geometry constraints imposed by Fe layers exaggerates the bulging in the Cu layers. However, the existence of ductile Cu layers does not improve the overall ductility of Cu/Fe and Fe/Cu multilayers. Cracking in the Fe layers directly lead to the failure of the multilayer micropillars, although the Cu layers have very good ductility. The results imply that suppressing the cracking of brittle layers is more important than simply adding ductile layers for improving the overall ductility of metallic multilayers.
Keywords
High Yield Stress Brittle Layer Flat Punch Geometry Constraint Constituent LayerNotes
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support from the Australian Research Council through the Laureate Fellowship for P.D. Hodgson.
References
- 1.E. Fortunato, P. Barquinha, and R. Martins: Adv. Mater., 2012, vol. 24, pp. 2945-86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.A.G. Aberle: Thin Solid Films 2009, vol. 517, pp. 4706-10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.M.A. Green: J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron., 2007, vol. 18, pp. 15-9.Google Scholar
- 4.B. Bhushan: in MEMS/NEMS and BioMEMS/BioNEMS: Materials, Devices, and Biomimetics Nanotribology and Nanomechanics II, B. Bhushan, ed., Springer, Berlin, 2011, pp. 833–945.Google Scholar
- 5.W.D. Nix: Metall. Trans. A, 1989, vol. 20, pp. 2217-45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.S.M. Spearing: Acta Mater., 2000, vol. 48, pp. 179-96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.W.N. Sharpe Jr: The MEMS handbook, 2002, vol. 3, pp. 1-33, CRC, Boca Raton.Google Scholar
- 8.J.Y. Zhang, X. Zhang, R.H. Wang, S.Y. Lei, P. Zhang, J.J. Niu, G. Liu, G.J. Zhang, and J. Sun: Acta Mater., 2011, vol. 59, pp. 7368-79.Google Scholar
- 9.J.Y. Zhang, S. Lei, Y. Liu, J.J. Niu, Y. Chen, G. Liu, X. Zhang, and J. Sun: Acta Mater., 2012, vol. 60, pp. 1610-22.Google Scholar
- 10.D. Gianola, and C. Eberl: JOM, 2009, vol. 61, pp. 24-35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.K.J. Hemker, and W.N. Sharpe: Annu. Rev. Mater. Res., 2007, vol. 37, pp. 93-126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.O. Kraft, P.A. Gruber, R. Mönig, and D. Weygand: Annu. Rev. Mater. Res., 2010, vol. 40, pp. 293-317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.M.D. Uchic, P.A. Shade, and D.M. Dimiduk: Annu. Rev. Mater. Res., 2009, vol. 39, pp. 361-86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.M. Uchic, D. Dimiduk, J. Florando, and W. Nix: Science, 2004, vol. 305, pp. 986-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.J.R. Greer, W.C. Oliver, and W.D. Nix: Acta Mater., 2005, vol. 53, pp. 1821-30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.M.C. Liu, J.C. Huang, H.S. Chou, Y.H. Lai, C.J. Lee, and T.G. Nieh: Scr. Mater., 2009, vol. 61, pp. 840-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.M.C. Liu, X.H. Du, I.C. Lin, H.J. Pei, and J.C. Huang: Intermetallics, 2012, vol. 30, pp. 30-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.J.Y. Zhang, S. Lei, J. Niu, Y. Liu, G. Liu, X. Zhang, and J. Sun: Acta Mater., 2012, vol. 60, pp. 4054-64.Google Scholar
- 19.S.-W. Lee, S.M. Han, and W.D. Nix: Acta Mater., 2009, vol. 57, pp. 4404-15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.J. Wang, C. Yang, and P.D. Hodgson: Scr. Mater., 2013, vol. 69, pp. 626-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.I.N. Sneddon: Int. J. Eng Sci 1965, vol. 3, pp. 47-57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.M.A. Hopcroft, W.D. Nix, and T.W. Kenny: J. Microelectromech. Syst., 2010, vol. 19, pp. 229-38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.A.R. Yavari, P.J. Desré, and T. Benameur: Phys. Rev. Lett., 1992, vol. 68, pp. 2235-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.E. Gaffet, M. Harmelin, and F. Faudot: J. Alloys Compd., 1993, vol. 194, pp. 23-30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.G.T. GrayIii, T.C. Lowe, C.M. Cady, R.Z. Valiev, and I.V. Aleksandrov: Nanostruct. Mater., 1997, vol. 9, pp. 477–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.M.A. Meyers, A. Mishra, and D.J. Benson: Prog. Mater Sci., 2006, vol. 51, pp. 427-556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.R. SuryanarayananIyer, C.A. Frey, S.M.L. Sastry, B.E. Waller, and W.E. Buhro: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 1999, vol. 264, pp. 210–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.D. Jia, K.T. Ramesh, and E. Ma: Acta Mater., 2003, vol. 51, pp. 3495-509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.K.Y. Xie, Y. Wang, S. Ni, X. Liao, J.M. Cairney, and S.P. Ringer: Scr. Mater., 2011, vol. 65, pp. 1037-40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.F.F. Csikor, C. Motz, D. Weygand, M. Zaiser, and S. Zapperi: Science, 2007, vol. 318, pp. 251-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Z.W. Shan, R.K. Mishra, S.A. Syed Asif, O.L. Warren, and A.M. Minor: Nat. Mater., 2008, vol. 7, pp. 115-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.M.C. Liu, C.J. Lee, Y.H. Lai, and J.C. Huang: Thin Solid Films 2010, vol. 518, pp. 7295-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 33.D.R.P. Singh, N. Chawla, G. Tang, and Y.L. Shen: Acta Mater., 2010, vol. 58, pp. 6628-36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar