Microstructural Developments Through Marforming in a Ni-Ti-Fe Shape Memory Alloy
- 255 Downloads
- 3 Citations
Abstract
A hot-rolled Ni-Ti-Fe alloy was subjected to marforming: approximately 8 pct reduction (in thickness) in the martensite phase by laboratory rolling. Before the next marforming step, the sample was annealed to bring back calorimetric signatures of reversible austenite-martensite phase transformation. Significant differences in microstructure could be achieved by combinations of marforming and annealing. Such differences, on the other hand, originated from the marformed microstructure: two distinct regions of remarkably different substructures. The difference was mainly through the relative presence of defects: micro-twins and dislocations. The regions of lower defect densities got textured gradually, with marforming steps, to γ (ND//〈111〉) fiber. The regions with high defect densities, on the other hand, provided non-γ fine clustered grains after annealing. Though debates may continue on the exact nature and origin of micro-twins, the present study brought out their dominant role in determining almost all aspects of microstructural developments.
Keywords
Austenite Martensite Residual Stress Shape Memory Alloy Austenite PhaseNotes
Acknowledgments
Support from the Department of Science and Technology and National Facility of Texture and Orientation Imaging Microscopy (OIM) is appreciated. A special mention needs to be made of the key reader and the two reviewers of this manuscript. Their appreciation for the results and careful/meticulous review have indeed improved the quality/readability of this manuscript.
References
- 1.B. Verlinden, J. Driver, I. Samajdar, and R.D. Doherty (2007). In: R.W. Cahn (Ed.), Thermo-Mechanical Processing of Metallic Materials. Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
- 2.M. Maikranz-Valentin, U. Weidig, U. Schoof, H.H. Becker and K. Steinhoff (2008) Steel Res. Int. 79(2):92–97.Google Scholar
- 3.F.J. Humphreys and M. Hatherly: in Recrystallization and Related Annealing Phenomena, Pergamon, Oxford, U.K., 2002.Google Scholar
- 4.M.H.Wu : Mater. Sc. Forum, 2002, vol. 394–395, pp. 285–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.D. Favier, Y. Liu, L. Orgeas, A. Sandel, L. Debove and P. Comte-Gaz: Mater. Sci. Eng., 2006, vol. A429, pp. 130–36.Google Scholar
- 6.K. Melton: U.S. Patent 4,386,971, 1983.Google Scholar
- 7.I. Karaman, H. E. Karaca, H.J. Maier, and Z.P. Luo: Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2003, vol. 34A, pp. 2527–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Z. Lekston, D. Stróż and M. J. Pawłowska: Solid State Phenom., 2010, vol.16, pp. 118–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.D. Treppmann and E. Hornbogen: J. Phys. IV, 1997, vol. 7, pp. C5 211–20.Google Scholar
- 10.K. Gall, J. Tyber, G. Wilkesanders, S. W. Robertson, R. O. Ritchie and H. J. Maier: Mater. Sci. Eng., 2008, vol. A486, pp. 389–403.Google Scholar
- 11.D. Wurzel: Mater. Sci. Eng., 1999, vol. A 273–275, pp. 634–38.Google Scholar
- 12.W.C. Crone, A.N. Yahya and J.H. Perepezko: Mater. Sci. Forum, 2002, vol. 386–388, pp. 597–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.A.S. Paula, K.K. Mahesh and FM Braz Fernandes (2011) J. Mater. Eng. Perform 20:771–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.A.S. Paula, K.K. Mahesh and FM Braz Fernandes (2008) Eur. Phys. J. 158:45–51.Google Scholar
- 15.A.S Paula, K.K Mahesh, CML Dos Santos, F. Braz Fernandes and C. da Costa Viana: Mater. Sci. Eng., 2008, vol. A 481–482, pp. 146–50.Google Scholar
- 16.J. Spielfeld: Mater. Sci. Eng., 1999, vol. A273–275, pp. 639–43.Google Scholar
- 17.S. Miyazaki, V.H. No, K. Kitamura, A. Khantachawana and H. Hosoda: IJP, 2000, vol. 16, pp. 1135–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.A. Khantachawana, S. Miyazaki, H. Iwai and M. Kohl: Mater. Sci. Eng., 1999, vol. A273–275, pp. 763–68.Google Scholar
- 19.L. Zhao, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands, 1997.Google Scholar
- 20.Y.C. Shu, K. Bhattacharya, Acta Mater. 46, 5457 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.A.S. Paula and F.M. Braz Fernandes: Proc. ESOMAT 2009, 2009, vol. 06024, pp. 1–6.Google Scholar
- 22.P. Van-Houtte: MTM-FHM Software System, version 2, MTM, KULeuven, Belgium, 1995.Google Scholar
- 23.H.J. Bunge: in Texture Analysis in Materials Science, Butterworths, London, 1982.Google Scholar
- 24.I. Groma: Phys Rev., 1998, vol. B 57, pp. 7535–42.Google Scholar
- 25.A. Borbely and I. Groma: Appl. Phys. Lett., 2001, vol. 79, pp. 1772–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.P. Prevéy: in Current Applications of X-Ray Diffraction Residual Stress Measurement, Developments in Materials Characterization Technologies, J. Friel and G. Van der Voort, eds., ASM International, Materials Park, OH, 1996.Google Scholar
- 27.P. Van Houtte and L. De Buyser (1993) Acta Metall. Mater. 41(2):323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.M. M. Nowell and S. I. Wright: Ultramicroscopy, 2005, vol. 103, pp. 41–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.R. Basu, L. Jain, B.C. Maji, M. Krishnan, K.V. ManiKrishna, P. Pant and I. Samajdar: Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2012, vol. 43A, pp. 1277–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.S.H. Chang and S.K. Wu: Scripta Mater., 2004, vol. 50, pp. 937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.A.S. Paula, J.H.P.G. Canejo, K.K. Mahesh, R.J.C. Silva, F.M. Braz Fernandes, R.M.S. Martins, A.M.A. Cardoso and N. Schell: Nucl. Inst. Methods Phys. Res., 2006, vol. B 246, pp. 206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.S. B. Ribeiro, T. G. Andrade, A. S. Paula, J. F. C. Lins, K. K. Mahesh, F. M. B. Fernandes (2012) Mater Sci Forum 702:884.Google Scholar
- 33.E. Goo, T. Deurig, K. Melton and R. Sinclair: Acta Metall., 1985, vol. 3, pp. 1725.Google Scholar
- 34.A.T. Paxton : Acta Metall. Mater., 1995, vol. 43(5), pp. 2133–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 35.M. Krishnan and B.C. Maji: Phil. Mag. Lett., 2001, vol. 81, pp. 243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 36.S.Li, K.Yamauchi, Y.Maruhashi and M.Nishida: Scripta Mater., 2003, vol.49, pp.723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 37.J. W. Christian and S. Mahajan: Prog. Mater. Sci., 1995, vol. 39, pp. 1–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 38.W.J. Moberly, R.W. Duerig, J.L. Proft and R. Sinclair: Mater. Sci. Forum, 2002, vol. 56–58, pp. 759–64.Google Scholar
- 39.T. Ezaz, H. Sehitoglu and H.J. Maier: Acta Mater., 2012, vol. 60, pp. 339–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 40.N.S. Surikova, A.A. Klopotov and E.A. Korznikova: Phys. Met. Metallogr., 2010, vol. 110(3), pp. 269–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 41.M. Krishnan and J.B. Singh (2000) Acta Mater., 48:1325–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 42.Y. Liu, Z. Xie, J.V. Humbeeck, L. Delaey and Y. Liu: Phil. Mag., 2000, vol. 8, pp. 1935.Google Scholar
- 43.Y. Liu, Z. Xie, J.V. Humbeeck and L. Delaey: Mater. Sci. Eng. 1999, vol. A273- 275, pp. 679.Google Scholar
- 44.F. Dalle, E. Perrin, P.Vermaut, M. Masse and R. Portier: Acta Mater., 2002, vol. 50, pp. 3557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 45.M. Nishida, S. Ii, K. Kitamura, T. Furukawa, A. Chiba, T. Hara and K. Hiraga: Scripta Mater., 1998, vol. 39(12), pp. 1749–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 46.H. A. Mohamed and J. Washburn : J. Mater. Sci., 1977, vol. 12, pp. 469–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 47.Y. Liu and Z. Xie (2007) In: P.L. Reece (Ed.), Progress in Smart Materials and Structures. Nova Science Publishers, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
- 48.S. Miyazaki, T. Imai, I. Igo, K. Otsuka, Metall. Trans. A 17A (1986) 115.Google Scholar
- 49.H. Funakubo, Shape Memory Alloys, Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, New York, 1987.Google Scholar
- 50.J. Van Humbeeck, R. Stalmans, in: K. Otsuka, C.M. Wayman (Eds.), Shape Memory Materials, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998, p. 149.Google Scholar
- 51.S. Miyazaki, K. Otsuka, Y. Suzuki, Scripta Metall. 15 (1981) 287.Google Scholar
- 52.S. Miyazaki, O. Matsumoto, K. Otsuka, and Y. Suzuki: Abstract Bulletin of the 95th Meeting of the Japan Institute of Metals, Hiroshima, 1983, p. 143.Google Scholar
- 53.S.K Giri, M. Krishnan, U. Ramamurty (2010) Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 528(1):363–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 54.Y. Liu, G.S. Tan, Intermetallics 8 (2000) 67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 55.M. Krishnan (1998) Acta Mater. 46(18):1439–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar