Measurements of Thermal Conductivity Variations with Temperature for the Organic Analog of the Nonmetal–Nonmetal System: Urea–4-Bromo-2-Nitroaniline
Abstract
Thermal conductivity variations with temperature for solid phases in the Urea (U)–[X] mol pct 4-bromo-2-nitroaniline (BNA) system (X = 0, 2, 45, 89.9, and 100) were measured using the radial heat flow method. From graphs of thermal conductivity variations with temperature, the thermal conductivities of the solid phases at their melting temperature and temperature coefficients for the U–[X] mol pct BNA system (X = 0, 2, 45, 89.9, and 100) were found to be 0.26, 0.55, 0.46, 0.38, and 0.23 W/Km and 0.007781, 0.005552, 0.002058, 0.002188, and 0.002811 K−1, respectively. The ratios of thermal conductivity of the liquid phase to thermal conductivity of the solid phase in the U–[X] mol pct BNA system (X = 0, 2, 45, 89.9, and 100) were also measured to be 0.30, 0.44, 0.46, 0.49, and 0.51, respectively, with a Bridgman-type directional solidification apparatus at their melting temperature.
Keywords
Thermal Conductivity Thermal Conductivity Measurement Thermal Conductivity Ratio Radial Temperature Gradient Thermal Conductivity VariationNotes
Acknowledgments
This project was supported by the Erciyes University Scientific Research Project Unit under Contract No. FBY-11-3775 and the Nevşehir University Scientific Research Project Unit under Contract No. NEÜADP13F15. The authors thank the Erciyes University Scientific Research Project Unit and Nevşehir University Scientific Research Project Unit for their financial support.
References
- 1.Y.S. Touloukian, R.W. Powell, C.Y. Ho, and P.G. Klemens: Thermal Conductivity Metallic Elements and Alloys, Plenum, New York, 1970, vol. 1, p. 17a.Google Scholar
- 2.G. Wiedemann and R. Franz: Alln. Phys. Cilem., 1953, vol. 89, p. 497.Google Scholar
- 3.J.B. Biot: Traité de Physique Experimentale et Mathematigue, Paris, 1816, p. 669.Google Scholar
- 4.H.L. Callendar and J.T. Nicolson: British Association for the Advancement of Science, Rept. Ann. Meeting, 1897, vol. 22, pp. 418–22.Google Scholar
- 5.C. Niven: Proc. R. Soc., 1905, vol. A76, pp. 34–48.Google Scholar
- 6.R.W. Powell: Proc. Phys. Soc., 1939, vol. 51, pp. 407–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.M.F. Angel: Phys. Rev., 1911, vol. 33, pp. 411–32.Google Scholar
- 8.D.L. McElroy and J.P. Moore: Thermal Conductivity, Academic Press, London, 1969, vol. I, pp. 185–239.Google Scholar
- 9.M. Gündüz and J.D. Hunt: Acta Metall., 1985, vol. 33, pp. 1651–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.N. Maraşlı and J.D. Hunt: Acta Metall., 1996, vol. 44, pp. 1085–96.Google Scholar
- 11.K. Keşlioğlu and N. Maraşlı: Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2004, vol. 35A, pp. 3665–72.Google Scholar
- 12.K. Keşlioğlu, M. Gündüz, H. Kaya, and E. Çadırlı: Mater. Lett., 2004, vol. 58, pp. 3067–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.M. Erol, N. Maraşlı, K. Keşlioğlu, and M. Gündüz: Scripta Mater., 2004, vol. 51, pp. 131–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.K. Keşlioğlu, M. Erol, N. Maraşlı, and M. Gündüz: J. Alloy. Compd., 2004, vol. 385, pp. 207–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.M. Erol, K. Keşlioğlu, and N. Maraşlı: J. Phys.: Condens. Matter, 2007, vol. 19, pp. 176003–16.Google Scholar
- 16.M. Erol, K. Keşlioğlu, R. Şahingöz, and N. Maraşlı: Met. Mater. Int., 2005, vol. 11, pp. 421–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Y. Ocak, S. Akbulut, N. Maraşlı, and E. Çadırlı: Fluid Phase Equilib., 2010, vol. 295, pp. 60–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.M. Erol, K. Keşlioğlu, and N. Maraşlı: Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2007, vol. 38A, pp. 1539–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.N. Maraşlı, S. Akbulut, Y. Ocak, K. Keşlioğlu, U. Böyük, H. Kaya, and E. Çadırlı: J. Phys. Condense Matter., 2007, vol. 19, pp. 506102–17.Google Scholar
- 20.Y. Terada, K. Ohkubo, T. Mohri, and T. Suzuki: J. Alloys Compd., 1999, vol. 285, pp. 233–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.B. Derby and J.J.A. Favier: Acta Metall., 1983, vol. 31, pp. 1123–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.H. Song and A. Hellawell: Metall. Trans., 1989, vol. 20, pp. 171–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Z.R. Liu, Y.H. Shao, C.M. Yin, and Y.H. Kong: Thermochim. Acta, 1995, vol. 250, pp. 65–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.U.S. Rai and P. Pandey: Mol. Mater., 2000, vol. 12, pp. 13–26.Google Scholar
- 25.S. Chaubey, K.S. Dubey, and P. Ramachandrarao: J. Alloy Phase Diag., 1990 vol. 6, pp. 153–57.Google Scholar
- 26.W. Kurz and D.J. Fisher: Acta Metall., 1981, vol. 29, pp. 11–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.J. Fu, J.W. Rice, and E.M. Suuberg: Fluid Phase Equilib., 2010, vol. 298, pp. 219–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.A. Ecker, D.O. Frazier, and J.I.D. Alexander: Metall. Trans., 1989, vol. 20, pp. 2517–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.H. Yasuda, I. Ohnaka, Y. Matsunaga, and Y. Shiohara: J. Cryst. Growth, 1996, vol. 158, pp. 128–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.J.P. Farges: Organic Conductors, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 1994.Google Scholar
- 31.P. Gunter: Nonlinear Optical Effects and Materials, Springer, Berlin, 2000, p. 540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.N.B. Singh, T. Henningsen, R.H. Hopkins, R. Mazelsky, R.D. Hamacher, E.P. Supertzi, F.K. Hopkins, D.E. Zelmon, and O.P. Singh: J. Cryst. Growth, 1993, vol. 128, pp. 976–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 33.R.S.B. Reddi, S. Ganesamoorthy, P.K. Gupta, and R.N. Rai: Fluid Phase Equilib., 2012, vol. 313, pp. 121–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.Ü. Bayram, S. Aksöz, and N. Maraşlı: Thermochimica Acta, 2012, vol. 531, pp. 12–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 35.S. Akbulut, Y. Ocak, K. Keşlioğlu, and N. Maraşlı: J. Phys. Chem. Solids, 2009, vol. 70, pp. 72–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 36.D.G. McCartney: Ph.D. Thesis, University of Oxford, Oxford, 1981, pp. 85–175.Google Scholar
- 37.E. Öztürk, S. Aksöz, K. Keşlioğlu, and N. Maraşlı: Thermochim. Acta, 2013, vol. 554, pp. 63–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar