Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A

, Volume 44, Issue 4, pp 1880–1886

Deformation Behavior Estimation of Aluminum Foam by X-ray CT Image-based Finite Element Analysis

  • Yoshihiko Hangai
  • Ryo Yamaguchi
  • Shunya Takahashi
  • Takao Utsunomiya
  • Osamu Kuwazuru
  • Nobuhiro Yoshikawa


Aluminum foam is a lightweight material owing to the existence of a large number of internal pores. The compressive properties and deformation behavior of aluminum foam are considered to be directly affected by the shape and distribution of these pores. In this study, we performed image-based finite element (FE) analyses of aluminum foam using X-ray computed tomography (CT) images and investigated the possibility of predicting its deformation behavior by comparing the results of FE analyses with those of actual compressive tests. We found that it was possible to create an analytic model reflecting the three-dimensional (3D) pore structure using image-based modeling based on X-ray CT images. The stress distribution obtained from image-based FE analysis correctly indicates the layer where deformation first occurs as observed in actual compressive tests. Also, by calculating the mean stress of each plane perpendicular to the direction of compression based on the stress distribution obtained from image-based FE analysis, it was found that deformation begins in the layer containing the plane with maximum stress. It was thus possible to estimate the layer where deformation begins during the compression of aluminum foam.


  1. 1.
    M.F. Ashby: Metall. Trans. A, 1983, vol. 14, pp. 1755–69.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    A.G. Evans, J.W. Hutchinson, and M.F. Ashby: Prog. Mater. Sci., 1998, vol. 43, pp. 171–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    L.J. Gibson: Ann. Rev. Mater. Sci., 2000, vol. 30, pp. 191–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    A.G. Evans, J.W. Hutchinson, N.A. Fleck, M.F. Ashby, and H.N.G. Wadley: Prog. Mater. Sci., 2001, vol. 46, pp. 309–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    J. Banhart: Prog. Mater. Sci., 2001, vol. 46, pp. 559–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    H. Nakajima: Prog. Mater Sci., 2007, vol. 52, pp. 1091–1173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    A.F. Bastawros and A.G. Evans: Adv. Eng. Mater., 2000, vol. 2, pp. 210–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    A.F. Bastawros, H. Bart-Smith, and A.G. Evans: J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 2000, vol. 48, pp. 301–22.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    A.E. Markaki and T.W. Clyne: Acta Mater., 2001, vol. 49, pp. 1677–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    D.J. Werther, A.J. Howard, J.P. Ingraham, and K.A. Issen: Scripta Mater., 2006, vol. 54, pp. 783–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. Hakamada, T. Kuromura, Y. Chino, Y. Yamada, Y.Q. Chen, H. Kusuda, and M. Mabuchi: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2007, vol. 459, pp. 286–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    N. Takano, M. Zako, F. Kubo and K. Kimura: Int. J. Solids Struct., 2003, vol. 40, pp. 1225–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    S.J. Hollister and N. Kikuchi: Biotechnol. Bioeng., 1994, vol. 43, pp. 586–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Y. Shiino, O. Kuwazuru, and N. Yoshikawa: J. Theor. Biol., 2009, vol. 259, pp. 132–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Y. Hangai, O. Kuwazuru, T. Yano, T. Utsunomiya, Y. Murata, S. Kitahara, S. Bidhar, and N. Yoshikawa: Mater. Trans., 2010, vol. 51, pp. 1574–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    N. Vanderesse, E. Maire, A. Chabod, and J.Y. Buffiere: Int. J. Fatigue, 2011, vol. 33, pp. 1514–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    E. Maire, A. Fazekas, L. Salvo, R. Dendievel, S. Youssef, P. Cloetens and J.M. Letang: Compos. Sci. Technol., 2003, vol. 63, pp. 2431–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    T. Kujime, M. Tane, S.K. Hyun, and H. Nakajima: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2007, vol. 460, pp. 220–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    I. Jeon, T. Asahina, K.-J. Kang, S. Im, and T.J. Lu: Mech. Mater., 2010, vol. 42, pp. 227–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    N. Michailidis, F. Stergioudi, H. Omar, and D. Tsipas: Comput. Mater. Sci., 2010, vol. 48, pp. 282–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    H. Toda, M. Takata, T. Ohgaki, M. Kobayashi, T. Kobayashi, K. Uesugi, K. Makii, and Y. Aruga: Adv. Eng. Mater., 2006, vol. 8, pp. 459–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    T. Miyoshi, M. Itoh, S. Akiyama, and A. Kitahara: Adv. Eng. Mater., 2000, vol. 2, pp. 179–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    JIS-H-7902: Method for Compressive Test of Porous Metals, Japanese Standards Association, 2008.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Y. Hangai, S. Maruhashi, S. Kitahara, O. Kuwazuru, and N. Yoshikawa: Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2009, vol. 40A, pp. 2789–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    The-Japan-Institute-of-Light-Metals: Structures and Properties of Aluminum, The Japan Institute of Light Metals, 1991, pp. 413–18.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    A. Pollien, Y. Conde, L. Pambaguian, and A. Mortensen: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2005, vol. 404, pp. 9–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    A.H. Brothers and D.C. Dunand: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2008, vol. 489, pp. 439–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    K. Shinagawa: in Porous Metals and Metallic Foams, L.P. Lefebvre, J. Banhart, and D. Dunand, eds., Destech Pubns Inc, 2008, pp. 95–98.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Y. Hangai, Y. Oba, S. Koyama, and T. Utsunomiya: Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2011, vol. 42A, pp. 3585–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Y. Hangai, K. Takahashi, T. Utsunomiya, S. Kitahara, O. Kuwazuru, and N. Yoshikawa: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2012, vol. 534, pp. 716–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society and ASM International 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yoshihiko Hangai
    • 1
  • Ryo Yamaguchi
    • 1
  • Shunya Takahashi
    • 1
  • Takao Utsunomiya
    • 2
  • Osamu Kuwazuru
    • 3
  • Nobuhiro Yoshikawa
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical System Engineering, Graduate School of EngineeringGunma UniversityKiryuuJapan
  2. 2.Research Organization for Advanced EngineeringShibaura Institute of TechnologySaitamaJapan
  3. 3.Department of Nuclear Power and Energy Safety Engineering, Graduate School of EngineeringUniversity of FukuiFukuiJapan
  4. 4.Institute of Industrial ScienceThe University of TokyoTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations