Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy and Corrosion Behavior of Co/CeO2 Nanocomposite Coatings in Simulating Body Fluid Solution
- 398 Downloads
- 2 Citations
Abstract
A series of Co/CeO2 (25 nm) nanocomposite coating materials by electrodeposition were successfully prepared containing different cerium oxide composition in the cobalt-plating bath. Stainless steel (304L) was used as support material for nanocomposite coatings. The nano-CeO2 is uniformly incorporated into cobalt matrix, and the effect on surface morphologies was identified by scanning electron microscopy with energy-dispersive X-ray analysis. Codeposition of nano-CeO2 particles with cobalt disturbs the regular surface morphology of the cobalt coatings. It should be noted that the as-prepared Co/CeO2 nanocomposite coatings were found to be much superior in corrosion resistance over those of pure cobalt coatings materials based on a series of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy measurements in simulating body fluid solution. With increase in the nano-CeO2 particles concentration in the cobalt electrolyte, it is observed that the corrosion resistance of Co/CeO2 increases. Co/CeO2 nanocomposite coatings have higher polarization resistance as compared with pure cobalt layers in simulating body fluid solution.
Keywords
CeO2 Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy Composite Coating Polarization Resistance Cerium OxideNotes
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge the International Cooperation Project Bilateral Romania (UDJG) France (ECP) Programme Humbert Curien (PHC) Brancusi titled Etude de Dépôts Composites Nanostructurées pour Surfaces Fonctionnelles (19603 PC – ANCS 114/4-04-2010).
References
- 1.R. Sen, S. Das, and K. Das: Mater. Res. Bull., 2012, vol. 47, pp. 478–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.C. Cai, X.B. Zhu, G.Q. Zheng, Y.N. Yuan, X.Q. Huang, F.H. Cao, J.F. Yang, and Z. Zhang: Surf. Coat. Technol., 2011, vol. 205, pp. 3448–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.L. Benea: J. Appl. Electrochem., 2009, vol. 39, pp. 1671–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.A.C. Ciubotariu, L. Benea, O. Mitoseriu, F. Wenger, and P. Ponthiaux: J. Optoelectron. Adv. Mater., 2009, vol. 11 (6), pp. 892–97.Google Scholar
- 5.L. Benea, F. Wenger, P. Ponthiaux, and J.P. Celis: Wear, 2009, vol. 266, pp. 398–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.A.C. Ciubotariu, L. Benea, M. Lakatos-Varsanyi, and V. Dragan: Electrochim. Acta, 2008, vol. 53, pp. 4557–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.F. Bratu, L. Benea, and J.P. Celis: Rev. Chim., 2008, vol. 59 (3), pp. 346–50.Google Scholar
- 8.A.S. ThippaReddy and W.G.V. Krishnamurthy: Mater. Lett. ,2012, vol. 66, pp. 141–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.P. Gyftou, M. Stroumbouli, E.A. Pavlatou, P. Asimidis, and N. Spyrellis: Electrochim. Acta, 2005, vol. 50, pp. 4544–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.F. Hou, W. Wang, and H. Guo: Appl. Surf. Sci. 2006, vol. 252, pp. 3812–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.P. Narasimman, M. Pushpavanam, and V.M. Periasamy: Appl. Surf. Sci. ,2011, vol. 258, pp. 590–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.B. Szczygiel and M. Kolodziej: Electrochim. Acta, 2005, vol. 50, pp. 4188–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.G. Parida, D. Chaira, M. Chopkar, and A. Basu: Surf. Coat. Technol., 2011, vol. 205, pp. 4871–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Y.-J. Xue, J.-S. Li, W. Ma, and M.-D. Duan: J. Mater. Sci., 2006, vol. 41, pp. 1781–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.N.S. Qu, D. Zhu, and K.C. Chan: Scripta Mater., 2006, vol. 54, pp. 1421–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.S.T. Aruna, C.N. Bindu, V. Ezhil Selvi, V.K.W. Grips, and K.S. Rajam: Surf. Coat. Technol., 2006, vol. 200, pp. 6871–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.J. Lapinski, D. Pletcher, and F.C. Walsh: Surf. Coat. Technol., 2011, vol. 205, pp. 5205–09.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Y.-M. Kong, H.-E. Kim, and H.-W. Kim: J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 2007, vol. 90, pp. 298–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.P. Baghery, M. Farzam, A.B. Mousavi, and M. Hosseini: Surf. Coat. Technol., 2010, vol. 204, pp. 3804–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.T.V. Byk, T.V. Gaevskaya, and L.S. Tsybulskaya: Surf. Coat. Technol., 2008, vol. 202, pp. 5817–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.C. Guo, Y. Zuo, X. Zhao, J. Zhao, and J. Xiong: Surf. Coat. Technol., 2008, vol. 202 (14), pp. 3385–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.L. Burzyńska, E. Rudnik, J Koza, L. Błaż, and W. Szymański: Surf. Coat. Technol., 2008, vol. 202, pp. 2545–56.Google Scholar
- 23.Z. Zhu, D. Zhu, N. Qu, and W. Lei: Mater. Des., 2007, vol. 28, pp. 1776–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.V.B. Singh and P. Pandey: Surf. Coat. Technol., 2006, vol. 200, pp. 4511–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.E. Pompeia, L. Magagnina, N. Lecisb, and P.L. Cavallotti: Electrochim. Acta, 2009, vol. 54, pp. 2571–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.F. Zhao, S. Franz, A. Vicenzo, P.L. Cavallotti, M. Sansotera, and W. Navarrini: Electrochim. Acta, 2011, vol. 56 (26), pp. 9644–51.Google Scholar
- 27.L. Benea, P. Ponthiaux, and F. Wenger: Surf. Coat. Technol., 2011, vol. 205, pp. 5379–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Y. Han, Y. Wang, Y. Wang, L. Jiao, H. Yuan, and S. Liu: Electrochim. Acta, 2011, vol. 56 (9), pp. 3258–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.J.B. Jorcin, M.E. Orazem, N. Pébère, and B. Tribollet: Electrochim. Acta, 2006, 51, 1473–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.V. Mei-Wen Huang, V. Vivier, I. Frateur, M.E. Orazem, and B. Tribollet: J. Electrochem. Soc., 2007, 154 (2), pp. C89–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.F. Farelas, M. Galicia, B. Brown, S. Nesic, and H. Castaneda: Corros. Sci., 2010, vol. 52, pp. 509–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.C.A. Schiller and W. Strunz: Electrochim. Acta, 2001, vol. 46, pp. 3619–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar