Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A

, Volume 43, Issue 4, pp 1328–1340 | Cite as

Asymmetric Rolling of Interstitial-Free Steel Using One Idle Roll

  • R. Lapovok
  • D. Orlov
  • I. B. Timokhina
  • A. Pougis
  • L. S. Toth
  • P. D. Hodgson
  • A. Haldar
  • D. Bhattacharjee

The effect of additional shear on the asymmetric rolling (ASR) of an interstitial-free (IF) steel was studied by modeling and experiments. The asymmetry was introduced by making one roll idle. A 66 pct of total thickness reduction was performed in 6 passes with less than 16 pct reduction per pass. ASR was performed in two ways: monotonically and by rotating the sheet between passes by 180 deg around the rolling direction (RD). Better grain fragmentation was obtained in the near surface layers. The results of monotonic asymmetric rolling are similar to symmetric rolling in terms of misorientation and cell size with the difference that the volume fraction of grains containing shear bands (SB) is larger for monotonic ASR. ASR with the sheet rotated 180 deg around the RD direction between passes showed the most promising results in terms of grain refinement, depth of the highly deformed layer, texture, and properties. The grain fragmentation process was also simulated with a recent grain refinement polycrystal model for strain hardening, texture development, grain size distribution, and grain misorientation distribution. The obtained simulation results showed strong agreement with the experiments.


  1. 1.
    “Basic Iron and Steel Manufacturing in Australia—Industry Market Research Report,”
  2. 2.
    R.Z. Valiev, Y. Estrin, Z. Horita, T.G. Langdon, M.J. Zehetbauer, and Y.T. Zhu, JOM, 2006, vol. 58 (4) , p. 33–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    A.A. Zisman, V.V. Rybin, S. Van Boxel, M. Seefeldt, and B. Verlinden. Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2006, vol. 427, pp. 123–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Y. Huang and P.B. Pragnell: Scripta Mater., 2007, vol. 56, pp. 333–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    R. Lapovok, P.W.J. McKenzie, P.F. Thomson, and S.L. Semiatin: J. Mater. Sci., 2007, vol. 45 (5), pp. 1649–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    R. Lapovok, I. Timokhina, P.W.J. McKenzie, and R. O’Donnell: J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2008, vol. 200, pp. 441–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Y.H. Jin, M.Y. Huh, and Y.H. Chung: J. Mater. Sci., 2004, vol. 39 (16), pp. 5311–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    G.Y. Tzou: J. Mater. Process. Technol., 1999, vol. 86 (1–3), pp. 271–77.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    H. Jin and D.J. Loyd: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2007, vol. 465, pp. 267–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    H. Utsunomiya, T. Ueno, and T. Sakai: Scripta Mater., 2007, vol. 57, pp. 1109–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    T. Sakai, K. Yoneda, and S. Osugi: Mater. Sci. Forum, 2005, vols. 495–497, pp. 507–602.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    R. Lapovok, L.S. Tóth, M. Winkler, and S.L. Semiatin: J. Mater. Res., 2009, vol. 24 (2), pp. 459–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    D. Orlov, R. Lapovok, L.S. Toth, I.B. Timokhina, P.D. Hodgson, D. Bhattacharjee, and A. Haldar: Mater. Sci. Forum, 2010, vols. 654–656, pp. 1255–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    “Help to Orientation Imaging Microscopy,” v5.3, TexSEM Laboratories, Inc., EDAX-TSL, 2006.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    L.S. Tóth, Y. Estrin, R. Lapovok, and C. Gu: Acta Mater., 2010, vol. 58 (5), pp. 1782–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    C.F. Gu, L.S. Toth, M. Arzaghi, and C.H.J. Davies. Scripta Mater., 2011, vol. 64, pp. 284–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    C.F. Gu, L.S. Toth, R. Lapovok, and C.H.J. Davies. Phil. Mag., 2011, vol. 91, pp. 273–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    C.F. Gu: Doctorate Thesis, Monash University, Melbourne, 2010.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    M. Arzaghi: Doctorate Thesis, University Paul Verlaine, Metz, France, 2010.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    L.S. Toth, A. Molinari, and Y. Estrin: J. Eng. Mater. Technol., 2002, vol. 124, pp. 71–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    H. Petryk, S. Stupkiewicz, and R. Kuziak: J. Mater. Proc. Technol., 2008, vol. 204, pp. 255–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    L.S. Toth, B. Beausir, C.F. Gu, Y. Estrin, N. Scheerbaum, and C.H.J. Davies: Acta Mater., 2010, vol. 58, pp. 6706–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society and ASM International 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Lapovok
    • 1
  • D. Orlov
    • 1
  • I. B. Timokhina
    • 2
  • A. Pougis
    • 3
  • L. S. Toth
    • 3
  • P. D. Hodgson
    • 2
  • A. Haldar
    • 4
  • D. Bhattacharjee
    • 4
  1. 1.Materials Engineering DepartmentMonash UniversityClaytonAustralia
  2. 2.Institute for Technology Research and Innovation, Deakin UniversityGeelongAustralia
  3. 3.Laboratoire d’Étude des Microstructures et de Mécanique des MatériauxUniversité Paul Verlaine–Metz, Ile du SaulcyMetz Cedex 01France
  4. 4.R&D DivisionTata Steel Ltd.JamshedpurIndia

Personalised recommendations