Mechanical Properties and Microstructural Evolution of Friction-Stir-Welded Thin Sheet Aluminum Alloys
- 299 Downloads
- 7 Citations
Abstract
Friction stir welding of thin aluminum sheets represents a potential goal for aircraft and automotive industries because of the advantages of using this new technological process. In the current work, the microstructural evolution and mechanical behavior of 6082T6-6082T6, 2024T3-2024T3, and 6082T6-2024T3 thin friction-stir-welded joints were investigated. Uniaxial tensile testing at room temperature, 443 K, 473 K, and 503 K (170 °C, 200 °C, and 230 °C) was used to determine the extent to which these ultra-thin joints can be used and deformed. The tensile stress–strain curves showed a decrease of the flow stress with increasing temperature and decreasing strain rate. The ductility of 6082T6-6082T6 joints generally improved when deformed at warm temperatures. It was almost constant for the 6082T6-2024T3 and reached the higher value in the 2024T3-2024T3 when deformed at 443 K and 473 K (170 °C and 200 °C) when compared with the room temperature value. Tensile specimens fractured in the middle of the weld zone in a ductile mode. The precipitation and growth of S’ type phases strengthens 2024T3-2024T3 joints during deformation. In the 6082T6-6082T6, β″ precipitates show some increase in size but give a lower contribution to strength. At 503 K (230 °C), recovery mechanisms (dislocation reorganization inside the deformed grains) are initiated but the temperature was not enough high to produce a homogeneous subgrain structure.
Keywords
Ultimate Tensile Strength Friction Stir Welding Friction Stir Welding Weld Zone Friction Stir Welding ProcessNotes
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Ing. P.P. De Marco and Ms. Todisco for precious help with the laboratory experiments. The Politecnico di Bari is gratefully acknowledged for supplying several materials for this investigation.
References
- 1.C.G. Rodes, M.W. Mahoney, W.H. Bingel, R.A. Spurling, and C.C. Bampton: Scripta Mater., 1997, vol. 36, pp. 69-75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.M.W. Mahoney, C.G. Rodes, J.G. Flintoff, R.A. Spurling, and W.H. Bingel: Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 1998, vol. 29A, pp. 1955-64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Y. Sato, H. Kokawa, M. Enomoto, and S. Jogan: Metall. Mater. Trans. A 1999, vol. 30A, pp. 2429-37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.K.V. Jata: Mater. Sci. Forum, 2000, vol. 331-337, pp. 1701-12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.R. Braun, C. Dalle Donne, G. Staniek (2000) . Mat. Wiss. u. Werkstofftech., 31:1017-26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.W.M. Thomas, E.D. Nicholas, J.C. Needam, M.G. Murch, P. Templesmith, and C.J. Dawes: GB Patent application 9125978.8 (1991); 9125978.8, December 1991 and US Patent No. 5460317, October 1995.Google Scholar
- 7.I. Charit, R.S. Mishra, and M.W. Mahoney: Scripta Mater., 2002, vol. 47, pp. 631-36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.H.G. Salem, A.P. Reynolds, and J.S. Lyons: Scripta Mater., 2002, vol. 46, pp. 337-42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.C.G. Rhodes, M.W. Mahoney, W.H. Bingel, and M. Calabrese: Scripta Mater., 2003, vol. 48, pp. 1451-55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.K.V. Jata and S.L. Semiatin: Scripta Mater., 2000, vol. 43, no. 8, pp. 743-49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.W.D. Lockwood, B. Tomaz, and A.P. Reynolds: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2002, vol. 323, pp. 348-53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.M. Guerra, C. Schmidt, J.C. McClure, L.E. Murr, and A.C. Nes: Mater. Charac., 2003, vol. 49, pp. 95-101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.J.Q. Su, T.W. Nelson, R. Mishra, and M. Mahoney: Acta Mater., 2003, vol. 51, pp. 713-29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.C.G. Rhodes, M.W. Mahoney, and W.H. Bingel: Scripta Mater., 1997, vol. 36, pp. 69-75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.G. Liu, L.E. Murr, C.S. Niou, J.C. McClure, and F.R. Vega: Scripta Mater., 1997, vol. 37, pp. 355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.L.E. Murr, G. Liu, and J.C. McClur: J. Mater. Sci. Lett., 1997, vol. 16, p. 1801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.P. Heurtier, C. Desrayaud, and F. Montheillet: Mater. Sci. Forum, 2002, vol. 396-402, p. 1537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.P. Bala Srinivasan, W. Dietzel, R. Zettler, J.F. Dos Santos, and V. Sivan: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2005, vol. 392, pp. 292-300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.W.B. Lee, Y.M. Yeon, and S.B. Jung: J. Mater. Sci. Lett., 2003, vol. 38, pp. 4183-91.Google Scholar
- 20.W.B. Lee, Y.M. Yeon, and S.B. Jung: Scripta Mater., 2003, vol. 49, pp. 423-28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.H. Uzun, C. Dalle Donne, A. Argagnotto, T. Ghidini, and C. Gambaro: Mater. Design, 2005, vol. 26, pp. 41-46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.C.M. Chen and R. Kovacevic: Int. J. Mach. Tool. Manuf., 2004, vol. 44, pp. 1203-14.Google Scholar
- 23.A.C. Somasekharan and L.E. Murr: Mater. Charact., 2004, vol. 52, pp. 49-64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Y. Li, E.A. Trillo, and L.E. Murr: J. Mater. Sci. Lett., 2000, vol. 19, pp. 1047-51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.E. Cerri, P. Leo, P.P. De Marco, D. Embury, and X. Wang: Aluminum Alloys – Their Physical and Mechanical Properties, J. Hirsch, B. Skrotzki, and G. Gottstein, eds., Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany, 2008, pp. 1917–23.Google Scholar
- 26.A.F. Norman, I. Brough, and P.B. Pragnell: Mater. Sci. Forum, 2000, vols. 331–337, pp. 1713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.M.A. Sutton, B. Yang, A.P. Reynolds, and J. Yan: J. Mat. Sci. Eng. A, 2004, vol. 364, p. 66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.R. Nandan, T. DebRoy, and H.K.D.H. Bhadeshia: Prog. Mater. Sci., 2008, vol. 53, pp. 980-1023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.C. Genevois, D. Fabrègue, A. Deschamps, and W.J. Poole: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2006, vol. 441, pp. 39-48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.A.K. Saad and T. Shibayanagi: Trans. JWRI, 2007, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 27-40.Google Scholar
- 31.V. Dixit, R.S. Mishra, R.J. Lederich, and R. Talwar: Report AFRL-ML-WP-TP-2006-468, 2006.Google Scholar