Near-Neutral pH Stress Corrosion Cracking Susceptibility of Plastically Prestrained X70 Steel Weldment
- 188 Downloads
- 5 Citations
Abstract
The application of strain-based design for pipelines requires comprehensive understanding of the postyield mechanical behavior of materials. In this article, the impact of plastic prestrain on near-neutral pH stress corrosion cracking (SCC) susceptibility of welded X70 steel was investigated with a slow strain rate tensile (SSRT) test. Generally, plastic prestrain reduces the SCC resistance in various welded zones. The SCC susceptibility of the test materials can be put in the following order: heat-affected zone (HAZ) > weld metal (WM) > base metal (BM). Fractographic analysis indicates that there are two cracking modes, mode I and mode II, during SSRT tests. Mode I cracks propagate along the direction perpendicular to the maximum tensile stress, and mode II cracks lie in planes roughly parallel to the plane where the maximum shear exists. The SCC of the BM is governed by mode I cracking and fracture of the HAZ, and the WM is dominated by mode II cracking. Damage analysis shows that the detrimental impact of plastic prestrain on the residual SCC resistance cannot be evaluated with the linear superposition model. A plastic prestrain sensitivity, a material constant independent of plastic prestrain, is proposed to characterize the susceptibility of SCC resistance to plastic prestrain, and it increases with the SCC susceptibility of the steels. The enhanced SCC susceptibility caused by plastic prestrain may be related to an increase in yield strength. The correlation of the ratio of the reduction in area in NS4 solution to that in air (RA SCC/RA air) with the yield strength is microstructure dependent.
Keywords
Weld Metal Stress Corrosion Crack Pipeline Steel Stress Corrosion Crack Resistance Stress Corrosion Crack SusceptibilityNotes
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by Evraz Inc. NA and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada.
References
- 1.J.X. Liu: Oil Gas J., 2004, vol. 102, pp. 58–65.Google Scholar
- 2.Y. Ogawa and T. Koike: Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Elsevier, New York, NY, 2001, vol. 21, pp. 199–209.Google Scholar
- 3.W. Mohr: “Strain-Based Design of Pipelines,” Report of Project No. 45892GTH to U.S. Department of Interior Management Service and U.S. Department of Transportation, Research and Special Programs Administration, Columbus, OH, 2003.Google Scholar
- 4.A.C. Walker: Underwater Technol., 1994, vol. 20, pp. 32–36.Google Scholar
- 5.M. Kashani and R. Young: J. Transpor. Eng., 2005, vol. 131, pp. 632–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.K.R. Jayadevan, E. Ostby, and C. Thaulow: Int. J. Press. Vess. Pip., 2004, vol. 81, pp. 771–83; 2005, vol. 82, pp. 201–15.Google Scholar
- 7.M. Liu, Y.Y. Wang, and D. Horsley: Proc. 24th Int. Conf. on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering–OMAE, 2005, vol. 3, pp. 385–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.B.T. Lu and J.L. Luo: Corrosion, 2006, vol. 62, pp. 129–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.J.F. McCabe and J.W. Oh: Pressure Vessels and Piping Division (Publication) PVP, ASME, New York, NY, 1999, vol. 388, pp. 285–97.Google Scholar
- 10.B.T. Lu and X.L. Zheng: Iron Steel, 1999, vol. 34, pp. 55–56.Google Scholar
- 11.R.N. Parkins: Corrosion/2000, NACE INTERNATIONAL, Houston, TX, 2000, Paper 363.Google Scholar
- 12.R.N. Parkins, W.K. Blanchard, Jr., and B.S. Delandy: Corrosion, 1994, vol. 50, pp. 394–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.National Energy Board, Public Inquiry Concerning Stress Corrosion Cracking on Canadian Oil and Gas Pipelines: Report of the Inquiry MH-2-95, National Energy Board, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 1996.Google Scholar
- 14.S.D. Liberto and G. Gabetta: Mater. Sci., 1997, vol. 33, pp. 411–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.S.X. Mao, B. Gu, N.Q. Wu, and L.J. Qiao: Philos. Mag. A, 2001, vol. 81, pp. 1813–31.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 16.B.T. Lu, J.L. Luo, P.R. Norton, and H.Y. Ma: Acta Mater., 2009, vol. 57, pp. 41–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.M. Elboujdaini, Y.-Z. Wang, and R.R. Revie: Proc. Int. Pipeline Conf. (IPC2000), ASME, New York, NY, 2000, vol. 2, pp. 967–85.Google Scholar
- 18.R.B. Rebak, Z. Xia, R. Safruddin, and Z. Szklarska-Smialowska: Corrosion, 1996, vol. 52, pp. 396–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.J.A. Beavers, J.T. Jonson, and R.L. Sutherby: Proc. Int. Pipeline Conf., ASME, New York, NY, 2000, vol. 2, pp. 979–88.Google Scholar
- 20.B.T. Lu and J.L. Luo: Corrosion, 2006, vol. 62, pp. 129–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.K. Poorhaydari and D.G. Ivey: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2006, vols. 435–436, pp. 371–82.Google Scholar
- 22.K. Poorhaydari and D.G. Ivey: Mater. Characterization, 2007, vol. 58, pp. 544–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.A.H. Adelek, J.L. Luo, and A.G. Ivey: Northern Area NACE Conf., Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada, Feb. 15–17, 2005.Google Scholar
- 24.D.A. Jones: Corrosion, 1996, vol. 52, pp. 356–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.W. Chen, F. King, T.R. Jack, and M.J. Wilmott: Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2002, vol. 33A, pp. 1429–36.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 26.H. Gao, G.F. Li, X. Cai, R.P. Yang, and W. Yang: J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2005, vol. 21, pp. 459–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.X.C. Li: Master’s Thesis, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada, 2005.Google Scholar
- 28.E. Maire, C. Bordreuil, L. Babout, and J.-C. Boyer: J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 2005, vol. 53, pp. 2411–34.MATHCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 29.J.T. Bulger: Master’s Thesis, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada, 2000.Google Scholar
- 30.B.T. Lu and X.L. Zheng: Trans. Chin. Weld. Inst., 1993, vol. 14 (2), pp. 117–24.Google Scholar
- 31.S.F. Yu, B.N. Qian, and X.M. Guo: Acta Metall. Sinica, 2005, vol. 41, pp. 402–06.Google Scholar
- 32.X.H. Xue, Y. Zhou, B.N. Qian, J.L. Li, and S.N. Lou: J. Shanghai Jiaotong Univ., 2003, vol. 37, pp. 1854–57.Google Scholar