Advertisement

Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A

, Volume 38, Issue 11, pp 2655–2665 | Cite as

Improved Pulse Shaping to Achieve Constant Strain Rate and Stress Equilibrium in Split-Hopkinson Pressure Bar Testing

  • Kenneth S. VecchioEmail author
  • Fengchun Jiang
Symposium: Dynamic Behavior of Materials

Abstract

Assuring a constant strain rate during dynamic testing is highly desirable to support the development of physically based predictive, constitutive material models. Many dynamic tests conducted on high-work-hardening materials, or materials that do not display a classic power-law-type hardening behavior, such as materials exhibiting complex sigmoidal concave-upward hardening (shape-memory alloys or a number of textured hexagonal metals due to deformation twinning), often result in continuously decreasing strain rates as a function of strain throughout the test. Incident pulse shaping has not been fully developed or successfully demonstrated over a large range of strain in high work hardening or complex-hardening materials. To shape an incident pulse for a constant strain rate in a split-Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) test, a high-strength, high-work-hardening rate (HSHWHR) material was selected to fabricate the pulse shaper. Several test sample materials, namely, 50-50 NiTi superelastic alloy, higher strength 60NiTi alloy, tungsten single crystals, interstitial-free (IF) steel, and MACOR (a glassy ceramic), which display a range of strength levels, work-hardening rates, and superelastic hardening behavior in the case of 50-50 NiTi, were tested in the SHPB with and without a pulse shaper at different temperatures and strain rates. The current experiments demonstrate that HSHWHR pulse-shaper materials are ideally suited to shape the incident pulse to achieve constant strain rates and achieve stress state equilibrium, while inherently dampening high frequency oscillations in the incident pulse.

Keywords

Pulse Shaper Constant Strain Rate Incident Pulse Stress Equilibrium Stress Pulse 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    W. Chen, B. Song, D.J. Frew, M.J. Forrestal: Exper. Mech., 2003, vol. 43, pp. 20–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    D.J. Parry, A.G. Walker, P.R. Dixon: Measurement Sci. Technol., 1995, vol. 6, pp. 443–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    S. Ellwood, L.J. Griffiths, D.J. Parry: J. Phys. E: Sci. Instrum., 1982, vol. 15, pp. 280–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. Nemat-Nasser et al.: J. Eng. Mater. Technol., 2005, vol. 127, pp. 83–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    J. Duffy, J.D. Campbell, R.H. Hawley: J. Appl. Mech., 1971, vol. 37, pp. 83–91Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    G.T. Gray: ASM Handbook, vol. 8, Mechanical Testing and Evaluation, ASM INTERNATIONAL, Materials Park, OH, 2000, pp. 462–76Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    C.E. Franz, P.S. Follanbee, and W.J. Wright: 8th Int. Conf. on High Energy Rate Fabrication, Pressure Vessel and Piping Division, San Antonio, TX, 1984, I. Beaman and J.W. Schroeder, eds., ASME, 1984Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    P.S. Follanbee: Metals Handbook, vol. 8, Mechanical Testing, 9th ed., ASM, Metals Park, OH, 1985, pp. 198–217Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    S. Nemat-Nasser, J.B. Isaacs, J.E. Starrett: Proc. R. Soc. London A, 1991, vol. 435, pp. 371–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    D.J. Frew, M.J. Forrestal, W. Chen: Exper. Mech., 2002, vol. 42, pp. 93–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    D.J. Frew, M.J. Forrestal, W. Chen: Exper. Mech., 2001, vol. 41, pp. 40–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    W. Chen, F. Lu, N. Winfree: Exper. Mech., 2002, vol. 42, pp. 65–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    W. Chen, B. Zhang, M.J. Forrestal: Exper. Mech., 1999, vol. 39, pp. 81–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    T.C. Togami, W.E. Baker, M.J. Forrestal: J. Appl. Mech., 1996, vol. 63, pp. 353–56Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    L. Ninan, J. Tsai, C.T. Sun: Int. J. Impact Eng., 2001, vol. 25, pp. 291–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Raghavendra R. Adharapurapu, Fengchun Jiang, Kenneth S. Vecchio, and George T. Gray, III: Acta Mater., 2006, vol. 54, pp. 4609–20Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Weinong W. Chen, Qiuping Wu, Joseph H. Kang, and Nancy A. Winfree: Int. J. Solids Struct., 2001, vol. 38, pp. 8989–98Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    G. Ravichandran, G. Subhash: J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 1994, vol. 77, pp. 263–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Metals Handbook, 9th ed., Howard E. Boyer and Timothy L. Gall, eds., ASM, Metals Park, OH, 1985, pp. 190–207. Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    A.M. Bragoy, A.K. Lomunov: Int. J. Impact Eng., 1995, vol. 16, pp. 321–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© THE MINERALS, METALS & MATERIALS SOCIETY and ASM INTERNATIONAL 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.NanoEngineering DepartmentUniversity of California, San DiegoLa JollaUSA

Personalised recommendations