Advertisement

Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A

, Volume 36, Issue 11, pp 3055–3063 | Cite as

Structural disordering in WC thin films induced by SiC additions

  • James E. Krzanowski
  • Jonathan Wormwood
Article

Abstract

An investigation has been conducted into the structural disordering in WC thin films induced by SiC additions. The effect of this disordering on film hardness is also reported. In this investigation, WC-SiC films with a SiC content varying from 11.6 to 38.2 pct were deposited using dual rf magnetron sputtering. The relative Si and W content in the films was determined using electron microprobe analysis. Analysis by X-ray diffraction (XRD) confirmed that, within this compositional range, the film structure transformed from crystalline to amorphous. The XRD patterns showed that the crystalline films consisted primarily of WC1−x , along with a small amount of W2C; no clear evidence for a separate crystalline SiC phase was found. High-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) studies showed that with a lower Si content, the films consisted of crystallites 3 to 5 nm in diameter embedded in an amorphous phase. As the Si content increased, the amorphous phase content increased, both as interlayers between crystallites and as particles within the crystallites. Further Si increases led to a structure consisting of a high density of interconnected amorphous particles within well-defined semicrystalline domains separated by a thin amorphous interlayer. At the highest Si content, a clear two-phase morphology evolved, consisting of two nearly amorphous but distinct phases, which suggests a fine-scale partial-phase separation between the WC and the SiC. At the atomic level, it was found that Si decreased the coherence length within the crystalline phase, resulting in a structure of mixed crystalline/highly disordered phases scaled in the range of 2 to 4 nm. Despite the significant alterations in the film structures due to SiC additions, the hardness and modulus of the films were essentially constant within the compositional range of the transition, although films with SiC contents of less than ∼11 pct had significantly lower hardness levels. It is proposed that the effects of Si on hardness can be explained in terms of competition between the percolation threshold and the amorphization-inducing effect of Si.

Keywords

Material Transaction Percolation Threshold Transition Metal Carbide Tungsten Silicide Amorphous Phase Content 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    R.A. Roy and R. Messier: J. Vac. Sci. Technol., 1984, vol. A2, pp. 312–15.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. Messier, A.P. Giri, and R.A. Roy: J. Vac. Sci. Technol., 1984, vol. A2, pp. 500–03.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    S. Veprek, S. Reiprich, and Li Shizhi: Appl. Phys. Lett., 1995, vol. 66, pp. 2640–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. Veprek: Thin Solid Films, 1998, vol. 317, pp. 449–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. Veprek, P. Nesladek, A. Niederhofer, F. Glatz, M. Jilek, and M. Sima: Surf. Coating Technol., 1998, vols. 108–109, pp. 138–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    S. Veprek, A. Niederhofer, K. Moto, T. Bolom, H.D. Mannling, P. Nesladek, G. Dollinger, and A. Bergmaier: Surf. Coating Technol., 2000, vols. 133–134, pp. 152–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    L. Rebouta, C.J. Tavares, R. Aimo, Z. Wang, K. Pischow, E. Alves, T.C. Rojas, and J.A. Odriozola: Surf. Coat. Technol., 2000, vol. 133–134, pp. 234–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    F. Vaz, L. Rebouta, P. Goudeau, J. Pacaud, H. Garem, J.P. Riviere, A. Cavaleiro, and E. Alves: Surf. Coating Technol., 2000, vols. 133–134, pp. 307–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    P.J. Martin and A. Bendavid: Surf. Coating Technol., 2003, vols. 163–164, pp. 245–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    X.D. Zhang, W.J. Meng, W. Wang, L.E. Rehn, P.M. Baldo, and R.D. Evans: Surf. Coating Technol., 2004, vols. 177–178, pp. 325–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    W.J. Meng, X.D. Zhang, B. Shi, R.C. Tittsworth, L.E. Rehn, and P.M. Baldo: J. Mater. Res., 2002, vol. 17, pp. 2628–32.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    J.E. Krzanowski and S.H. Koutzaki: J. Am. Cer. Soc., 2001, vol. 84, pp. 672–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    S.H. Koutzaki, J.E. Krzanowski, and J.J. Nainaparampil: J. Vac. Sci. Technol., 2001, vol. A19, pp. 1912–18.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    A.R. Phani, J.E. Krzanowski, and J.J. Nainaparampil: J. Vac. Sci. Technol., 2001, vol. A19, pp. 2252–58.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    W.J. Meng, R.C. Tittsworth, and L.E. Rehn: Thin Solid Films, 2000, vols. 377–378, pp. 222–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    A.A. Voevodin and J.S. Zabinski: J. Mater. Sci., 1998, vol. 33, pp. 319–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    J.L. Endrino and J.E. Krzanowski: J. Mater. Res., 2002, vol. 17, pp. 3163–67.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    J.T. Armstrong: Microbeam Analysis, 1995, vol. 4, pp. 177–200.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    PDF-JCPDS Data Cards, International Center of Diffraction Data, Swarthmore, PA, 1988.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    J.E. Krzanowski and J.L. Endrino: Mater. Lett., 2004, vols. 58/27–58/28. pp. 3437–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    J.W. Cahn: Trans. AIME, 1968, vol. 142, pp. 166–80.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    D.B. Williams and C.B. Carter: Transmission Electron Microscopy, Vol. 3: Imaging, Plenum Press, New York, NY, 1996, pp. 357–58.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    J. Patscheider, T. Zehnder, and M. Diserens, Surf. Coating Technol., 2001, vols. 146–147, pp. 201–08.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International & TMS-The Minerals, Metals and Materials Society 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • James E. Krzanowski
    • 1
  • Jonathan Wormwood
    • 1
  1. 1.the Mechanical Engineering Department and Materials Science ProgramUniversity of New HampshireDurham

Personalised recommendations