Effect of microstructure on mechanical properties of as-cast Mg-Al alloys
- 429 Downloads
- 34 Citations
Abstract
The mechanical properties of Mg-Al alloys are mainly determined by the microstructure, i.e., the amount and morphology of the phases, but also by the presence of defects arising from the melt handling and casting process. In order to obtain information about the isolated effect of the microstructure, it is, therefore, necessary to minimize the amounts of defects. In this study, this has been achieved by remelting and solidifying the alloys in a gradient furnace. The drawing rate was varied from 0.3 to 6 mm/s, which yielded a wide variety of microstructures. Three samples were produced for each parameter set, in order to have a statistical basis for the evaluation. The results showed that homogeneous and reproducible samples could be produced, and that the tensile properties obtained showed a very small scatter. The effects of microstructural parameters such as grain size, secondary dendrite arm spacing (SDAS), eutectic fraction, and eutectic morphology on the yield strength, ultimate tensile strength (UTS), fracture elongation, and hardness has been investigated.
Keywords
Yield Strength Material Transaction Ultimate Tensile Strength Eutectic Structure Drawing RatePreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.H. Sasaki, M. Adachi, and T. Sakamoto: IMA 53. Magnesium—a Material Advancing to the 21st Century, Ube City, Yamaguchi, Japan, IMA (USA), 1996, pp. 86–92.Google Scholar
- 2.Z. Zhang, A. Couture, R. Tremblay, and D. Dube: Light Metals, (Canada), 1999, pp. 397–406.Google Scholar
- 3.C.H. Caceres and D.M. Rovera: J. Light Met., 2001, vol. 1, pp. 151–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.M.S. Misra and K.J. Oswalt: Transactions of the American Foundrymen’s Society, Vol. 83, Des Plaines, III, 1975, pp. 299–306.Google Scholar
- 5.A.K. Dahle, S. Sannes, D.H. St. John, and H. Westengen: J. Light Met., 2001, vol. 1, pp. 99–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.S. Sannes and H. Westengen: Conf. on Magnesium Alloys and Their Applications, Wolfsburg, Germany, 1998, pp. 223–28.Google Scholar
- 7.J. Bäckman: Licenciate Thesis, Jönköping University, Jönköping, 1999.Google Scholar
- 8.H. Fredriksson and U. Äkerlind: Compendium of Casting Processing, The Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Stockholm, 2001.Google Scholar
- 9.M.D. Nave, A.K. Dahle, and D.H. St. John: Conf. on Magnesium Technology 2000, TMS/AIME, Warrendale, USA, 2000, pp. 233–42.Google Scholar
- 10.M.D. Nave, A.K. Dahle, and D.H. St. John: Conf. on Magnesium Technology 2000, TMS/AIME, Warrendale, USA, 2000, pp. 243–50.Google Scholar
- 11.M.D. Nave, A.K. Dahle, and D.H. St. John: Int. J. Cast Met. Res., 2000, vol. 13, pp. 1–7.Google Scholar
- 12.B. Sundman, B. Jansson, and J.O. Andersson: CALPHAD, 1985, vol. 9, pp. 153–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.N. Saunders: “Mg-DATA, a Database for Thermodynamic Calculations of Mg-Alloys,” Thermotech Ltd., Guilford, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
- 14.R.E. Smallman and R.J. Bishop: Metals and Materials: Science, Processes and Application, Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd., Oxford, UK, 1995, pp. 228–29.Google Scholar
- 15.A.F. Crawley and B. Lagoweki: Metall. Trans., 1974, vol. 5, pp. 949–51.Google Scholar
- 16.E. Blank, M. Kaspar, and M. Rappaz: Proc. Strength of Metals and Alloys Vol. 1, Montreal, Canada, Pergamon Press Ltd., Oxford, UK, 1985, pp. 87–92.Google Scholar
- 17.L.M. Brown and W.M. Stobbs: Phil. Mag., 1971, vol. 23, pp. 1185–99.Google Scholar
- 18.L.M. Brown and D.R. Clarke: Acta Metall., 1975, vol. 23, pp. 821–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.D. Tabor: Proc. R. Soc, 1948, vol. 192, pp. 247–74.Google Scholar
- 20.C.L. Bancroft, C.H. Caceres, and J.R. Griffiths: Magnesium Technology 2000, 2000 TMS Annual Meeting, Nashville, TN, 2000, pp. 291–94.Google Scholar
- 21.Akhtar and E. Teghtsoonian: Acta Metall., 1969, vol. 17, pp. 1351–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.B. Lagowski and J.W. Meier: AFS Trans., 1968, vol. 76, pp. 133–41.Google Scholar