Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A

, Volume 34, Issue 4, pp 913–925 | Cite as

Effect of quenching, tempering, and cold rolling on creep deformation behavior of a tempered martensitic 9Cr-1W steel

  • Fujio Abe
Article

Abstract

The effect of quenching, tempering, cold-rolling, and aging treatments, which produce different dislocation substructures and different carbide distributions, on the creep-deformation behavior is investigated for a tempered martensitic 9Cr-1W steel at 873 K, mainly. The creep rate vs time curves indicate transient creep, where the creep rate decreases with time, and accelerating creep, where the creep rate increases with time. The minimum creep rate is closely correlated with the onset time of acceleration creep and is inversely proportional to the duration of the transient creep region. The onset of acceleration creep shifts to shorter times for the specimens subjected to the quenching, 20-hour tempering (long-term tempering) at 1023 K, and cold-rolling treatments than that for the specimen subjected to the standard quenching and tempering (QT) treatment. The onset of acceleration creep is closely correlated with the migration of lath or subgrain boundaries, causing the coarsening of laths or subgrains. Dislocation cells produced by cold rolling are free of M23C6 carbides. The migration and recovery of dislocation cells significantly promote the onset of acceleration creep. The preferential distribution of M23C6 carbides along lath boundaries is effective for the retardation of the onset of acceleration creep for up to longer times by the stabilization of lath boundaries. In the acceleration creep region, after reaching a minimum creep rate, the logarithm of the creep rate increases linearly with strain for a wide range of strains. The time to rupture (tr) is inversely proportional to the minimum creep rate \((\dot \varepsilon _{\min } )\) times the acceleration of the creep rate (d ln \(\dot \varepsilon \)/dε) in the acceleration creep region, but is not proportional to only the minimum creep rate, as given by
$$tr = 1.5/(\dot \varepsilon _{\min } (d\ln \dot \varepsilon /d\varepsilon ))$$
This equation is derived on the basis of the exponential function of strain in the acceleration creep region.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    M. Staubli, K.H. Mayer, T.U. Kern, R.W. Vanstone, R. Hanus, J. Stief, and K.H. Schonfeld: Proc. 3rd EPRI Conf. on Advances in Materials Technology for Fossil Power Plants, The Institute of Materials, London, United Kingdom, 2001, pp. 15–32.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    W.P. Parks, P. Hoffman, M.A. Karnitz, and I.G. Wright: Proc. 6th Liege Conf. on Materials for Advanced Power Engineering, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany, 1998, pp. 1789–1805.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    F. Abe, M. Igarashi, S. Wanikawa, M. Tabuchi, T. Itagaki, K. Kimura, and K. Yamaguchi: Proc. 3rd EPRI Conf. on Advances in Materials Technology for Fossil Power Plants, The Institute of Materials, London, United Kingdom, 2001, pp. 79–88.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    F. Abe and T. Noda: Encyclopedia of Materials: Science and Technology, K.H.J. Buschow, R.W. Cahn, M.C. Flemings, B. Ilschner, E.J. Kramer, and S. Mahajan, eds., Elsevier Science, Amsterdam-New York-Oxford-Paris-Shannon-Tokyo, 2001, pp. 3418–22.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    F. Masuyama: Iron Steel Inst. Jpn. Int., 2001, vol. 41, pp. 612–25.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    K. Maruyama, K. Sawada, and J. Koike: Iron Steel Inst. Jpn. Int., 2001, vol. 41, pp. 641–53.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    B.F. Dyson and M. McLean: Iron Steel Inst. Jpn. Int., 1990, vol. 30, pp. 802–11.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    B.F. Dyson and M. McLean: Acta Metall., 1983, vol. 31, pp. 17–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    F. Abe, H. Araki, and T. Noda: Metall. Trans. A, 1991, vol. 22A, pp. 2225–35.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    F. Abe, S. Nakazawa, H. Araki, and T. Noda: Metall. Trans. A, 1992, vol. 23A, pp. 469–77.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    F. Abe and S. Nakazawa: Metall. Trans. A, 1992, vol. 23A, pp. 3025–34.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    F. Abe: unpublished research.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    F. Abe and S. Nakazawa: Metall. Trans. A, 1992, vol. 23A, pp. 3025–34.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    F. Abe: Mater. Sci. Eng., 1997, vols. A234–A236, pp. 1045–48.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    M. Prager: Pressure Vessel Piping, 1994, vol. 288, pp. 401–21.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    R. Woo, R. Sandstrom, and J. Storesund: Mater. High Temp., 1994, vol. 12, pp. 277–83.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    S. Straub, M. Meier, J. Ostermann, and W. Blum: VGB Kraftwerkstechnik, 1993, vol. 73, pp. 646–53.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    F. Abe: Mater. Sci. Eng., 2001, vols. A319–A321, pp. 770–73.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    R.W. Evans and B. Wilshire: Creep of Metals and Alloys, The Institute of Metals, London, 1985, pp. 9–21.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    R.D. Doherty: Physical Metallurgy, 3rd ed., R.W. Cahn and P. Haasen, eds., North-Holland Physics Publishing, Amsterdam 1983, pp. 987–96.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International & TMS-The Minerals, Metals and Materials Society 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fujio Abe
    • 1
  1. 1.the Heat Resistant Design Group, Steel Research CenterNational Institute for Materials ScienceTsukubaJapan

Personalised recommendations