Advertisement

Archives of Osteoporosis

, 14:44 | Cite as

Secondary prevention of minor trauma fractures: the effects of a tailored intervention—an observational study

  • P. C. R. van der Vet
  • J. Q. Kusen
  • M. Rohner-Spengler
  • B. C. Link
  • R. M. Houwert
  • R. Babst
  • C. Henzen
  • L. Schmid
  • F. J. P. BeeresEmail author
Original Article
  • 66 Downloads

Abstract

Introduction

Minor trauma fractures (MTF) in the elderly are associated with an increase in mortality, morbidity, and the risk of subsequent fractures. Often, these patients who sustain MTF have an underlying bone disease, such as osteopenia or osteoporosis. Osteoporosis is known to be underdiagnosed and undertreated, and adequate treatment is essential to reduce the occurrence of MTFs. At our hospital, this has led to the implementation of Osteofit, a patient-education-based intervention targeted at improving screening and prevention of osteoporosis, with the goal to reduce the rate of subsequent MTF.

Objective

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of Osteofit in improving osteoporosis screening and treatment in patients after an initial MTF episode.

Methods

The study is a prospective, single-center, cohort study of MTF patients aged 50 years or older. A standardized questionnaire and telephone interview were used to collect 1-year follow-up data. The primary outcome was the rate of patients undergoing Dual X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) scanning. Secondary outcomes were the rate of patients with a diagnosis of osteoporosis or osteopenia, the rate of patients treated with anti-osteoporotic medication, and the rate of patients with a subsequent fracture. DXA scanning rate, the prevalence of a diagnosis (osteoporosis/osteopenia), and data on medical treatment for osteoporosis were compared to the results of a previous study in the same hospital, published in 2004.

Results

Between 2012 and 2015, 411 of 823 eligible patients consented to participate and were included in this study. The mean age was 72 ± 9.3 years. Sixty-three percent (63.3%, n = 252) of the patients received a DXA scan, compared to 12.6% reported in our previous study. Of all patients who received a DXA scan, 199 (82.9%) were diagnosed with osteoporosis or osteopenia. A total of 95 patients (23.1%) received specific medical treatment for osteoporosis and 59.8% reported the intake of any unspecific medication (vitamin D, calcium, or both). Fifteen patients (3.9%) had a subsequent fracture as a result of a minor trauma fall.

Conclusion

The implementation of a MTF secondary prevention program with dedicated health professionals improved the rate of patients who underwent DXA screening by fivefold. Despite this improvement, DXA screening was missed in over a third of patients, with only 23% of eligible patients receiving specific medical treatment for osteoporosis at 1-year follow-up. Consequently, this tailored intervention is a promising first step in improving geriatric fracture care. However, further work to improve the rate of osteoporosis screening and medical treatment initiation for the long-term prevention of subsequent MTF is recommended. We believe osteoporosis screening and adequate osteoporosis medication should be integrated as standard procedure in the aftercare of MTF.

Level of evidence: II.

Keywords

Fracture Secondary prevention Osteopenia Osteoporosis 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Schmid L, Henzen C, Schlumpf U, Babst R (2004) Improving secondary prevention in fragility fracture patients: the impact of a simple clinical information procedure. J Appl Res 4(4):570–575Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    McLellan AR, Gallacher SJ, Fraser M, McQuillian C (2003) The fracture liaison service: success of a program for the evaluation and management of patients with osteoporotic fracture. Osteoporos Int 14(12):1028–1034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Suhm N, Lamy O, Lippuner K (2008) Management of fragility fractures in Switzerland: results of a nationwide survey. Swiss Med Wkly 138(45–46):674–683PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bliuc D, Nguyen ND, Nguyen TV, Eisman JA, Center JR (2013) Compound risk of high mortality following osteoporotic fracture and refracture in elderly women and men. J Bone Miner Res 28(11):2317–2324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lippuner K, Golder M, Greiner R (2005) Epidemiology and direct medical costs of osteoporotic fractures in men and women in Switzerland. Osteoporos Int 16(Suppl 2):S8–s17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nakayama A, Major G, Holliday E, Attia J, Bogduk N (2016) Evidence of effectiveness of a fracture liaison service to reduce the re-fracture rate. Osteoporos Int 27(3):873–879CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Stephen AB, Wallace WA (2001) The management of osteoporosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br Vol 83(3):316–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tosi LL, Lane JM (1998) Osteoporosis prevention and the orthopaedic surgeon: when fracture care is not enough. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80(11):1567–1569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nguyen TV, Center JR, Eisman JA (2004) Osteoporosis: underrated, underdiagnosed and undertreated. Med J Aust 180(5 Suppl):S18–S22PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Johnell O, Kanis JA, Oden A, Sernbo I, Redlund-Johnell I, Petterson C et al (2004) Fracture risk following an osteoporotic fracture. Osteoporos Int 15(3):175–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP (2007) Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ (Clinical research ed) 335(7624):806–808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Owens WD, Felts JA, Spitznagel EL Jr (1978) ASA physical status classifications: a study of consistency of ratings. Anesthesiology 49(4):239–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Müller MENS, Koch P, Schatzker J (1990) The comprehensive classification of fractures of the long bones, 1st edn. Springer-Verlag, New York XIV, 202 pCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jensen JS (1980) Classification of trochanteric fractures. Acta Orthop Scand 51(5):803–810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Osteoporose SVgd. Empfehlungen 2015 Switzerland2015 updated 11-30-2017. Available from: https://svgo.ch/content/documents/2015/SVGO%20Empfehlungen%202015.pdf
  16. 16.
    Eekman DA, van Helden SH, Huisman AM, Verhaar HJ, Bultink IE, Geusens PP et al (2014) Optimizing fracture prevention: the fracture liaison service, an observational study. Osteoporos Int 25(2):701–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Stevenson M, Jones ML, De Nigris E, Brewer N, Davis S, Oakley J (2005) A systematic review and economic evaluation of alendronate, etidronate, risedronate, raloxifene and teriparatide for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosisGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Campbell AJ, Robertson MC (2013) Fall prevention: single or multiple interventions? Single interventions for fall prevention. J Am Geriatr Soc 61(2):281–4; discussion 6-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Elley CR, Robertson MC, Garrett S, Kerse NM, McKinlay E, Lawton B, Moriarty H, Moyes SA, Campbell AJ (2008) Effectiveness of a falls-and-fracture nurse coordinator to reduce falls: a randomized, controlled trial of at-risk older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 56(8):1383–1389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mikolaizak AS, Lord SR, Tiedemann A, Simpson P, Caplan G, Bendall JC, Howard K, Close J (2018) Adherence to a multifactorial fall prevention program following paramedic care: predictors and impact on falls and health service use. Results from an RCT a priori subgroup analysis. Australas J Ageing 37(1):54–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lindsay R, Silverman SL, Cooper C, Hanley DA, Barton I, Broy SB et al (2001) Risk of new vertebral fracture in the year following a fracture. Jama 285(3):320–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Blackman S, Goldstein KM (1968) Some aspects of a theory of community mental health. Community Ment Health J 4(1):85–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Galea S, Tracy M (2007) Participation rates in epidemiologic studies. Ann Epidemiol 17(9):643–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cummings SR, Nevitt MC, Kidd S (1988) Forgetting falls. The limited accuracy of recall of falls in the elderly. J Am Geriatr Soc 36(7):613–616CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. C. R. van der Vet
    • 1
  • J. Q. Kusen
    • 1
  • M. Rohner-Spengler
    • 1
  • B. C. Link
    • 1
  • R. M. Houwert
    • 2
  • R. Babst
    • 1
  • C. Henzen
    • 1
    • 3
  • L. Schmid
    • 1
    • 4
  • F. J. P. Beeres
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma SurgeryCantonal Hospital LucerneLucerneSwitzerland
  2. 2.Department of Trauma SurgeryUniversity Medical CenterUtrechtThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and DiabetesCantonal HospitalLucerneSwitzerland
  4. 4.Department of Medicine, Division of RheumatologyCantonal Hospital LucerneLucerneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations