Advertisement

Archives of Osteoporosis

, 14:38 | Cite as

Stages of sarcopenia, bone mineral density, and the prevalence of osteoporosis in older women

  • Ricardo M. LimaEmail author
  • Ricardo Jacó de Oliveira
  • Rafael Raposo
  • Silvia Gonçalves Ricci Neri
  • André Bonadias Gadelha
Original Article
  • 15 Downloads

Abstract

Summary

A better understanding of the relationship between osteoporosis and sarcopenia may help to develop effective preventive and therapeutic strategies. In the present study, the association between different stages of sarcopenia, BMD, and osteoporosis was examined. The salient findings indicate that a dose–response relationship exists between sarcopenia stages and bone-related phenotypes.

Purpose

To assess the association between sarcopenia stages, bone mineral density (BMD), and the prevalence of osteoporosis in older women.

Methods

Two hundred thirty-four women (68.3 ± 6.3 years) underwent body composition and BMD measurements using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Quadriceps isokinetic torque was evaluated, and the timed up-and-go test was conducted as a measure of function. Sarcopenia stages were classified according to European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP): nonsarcopenia, presarcopenia, sarcopenia, and severe sarcopenia. Osteoporosis was defined as BMD value (hip or spine) 2.5 standard deviations below a young-adult reference population. Between-group differences were examined using ANOVA for continuous variables and chi-squared for categorical variables. Logistic regression was performed to evaluate the association between sarcopenia stages and osteoporosis.

Results

Rates of osteoporosis were 15.8%, 19.2%, 35.3%, and 46.2% for nonsarcopenia, presarcopenia, sarcopenia, and severe sarcopenia, respectively (P = 0.002). Whole-body and femoral neck BMD values were significantly lower among all sarcopenia stages when compared to nonsarcopenia (all P values < 0.05, η2p 0.113 to 0.109). The severe sarcopenia group also showed significantly lower lumbar spine BMD values and T-scores (both P values < 0.05; η2p 0.035 and 0.037, respectively). When clustered, sarcopenia and severe sarcopenia exhibited lower BMD values for all sites (all P values < 0.01), and presented a significantly higher risk for osteoporosis (odds ratio 3.445; 95% CI 1.521–7.844).

Conclusion

The observed results provide support for the concept that a dose–response relationship exists between sarcopenia stages, BMD, and the presence of osteoporosis. These findings strengthen the clinical significance of the EWGSOP sarcopenia definition and indicate that severe sarcopenia should be viewed with attention by healthcare professionals.

Keywords

Aging Sarcopenia Osteoporosis Osteosarcopenia 

Notes

Funding information

The authors would like to thank the Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) grant no. 307203/2016-6.

Compliance with ethical standards

All participants were informed about the study procedures and voluntarily signed an informed consent form. All experiments on human subjects were conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and the study protocol was previously approved by the University of Brasilia Review Board, under protocol no. 1,223,636/2015.

Conflicts of interest

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Siris E, Adler R, Bilezikian J, Bolognese M, Dawson-Hughes B, Favus M, Harris S, De Beur SJ, Khosla S, Lane N (2014) The clinical diagnosis of osteoporosis: a position statement from the National Bone Health Alliance Working Group. Osteoporos Int 25(5):1439–1443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hopkins R, Burke N, Von Keyserlingk C, Leslie W, Morin S, Adachi J, Papaioannou A, Bessette L, Brown J, Pericleous L (2016) The current economic burden of illness of osteoporosis in Canada. Osteoporos Int 27(10):3023–3032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wright NC, Looker AC, Saag KG, Curtis JR, Delzell ES, Randall S, Dawson-Hughes B (2014) The recent prevalence of osteoporosis and low bone mass in the United States based on bone mineral density at the femoral neck or lumbar spine. J Bone Miner Res 29(11):2520–2526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cosman F, Krege J, Looker A, Schousboe J, Fan B, Isfahani NS, Shepherd J, Krohn K, Steiger P, Wilson K (2017) Spine fracture prevalence in a nationally representative sample of US women and men aged≥ 40 years: results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2013-2014. Osteoporos Int 28(6):1857–1866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wright N, Saag K, Dawson-Hughes B, Khosla S, Siris E (2017) The impact of the new National Bone Health Alliance (NBHA) diagnostic criteria on the prevalence of osteoporosis in the USA. Osteoporos Int 28(4):1225–1232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    J-p Z, H-x M, S-w Z, W-l L, C-q C, H-b Z, Li S-f, Y-p F, Sun C-h (2018) Risk factors for osteoporosis in liver cirrhosis patients measured by transient elastography. Medicine 97(20):e10645.  https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000010645 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Drey M, Sieber CC, Bertsch T, Bauer JM, Schmidmaier R (2016) Osteosarcopenia is more than sarcopenia and osteopenia alone. Aging Clin Exp Res 28(5):895–899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Baeyens JP, Bauer JM, Boirie Y, Cederholm T, Landi F, Martin FC, Michel JP, Rolland Y, Schneider SM, Topinkova E, Vandewoude M, Zamboni M (2010) Sarcopenia: European consensus on definition and diagnosis: report of the European working group on sarcopenia in older people. Age Ageing 39(4):412–423.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afq034 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rosenberg IH (1989) Epidemiologic and methodologic problems in determining nutritional status of older persons. Proceedings of a conference. Albuquerque, New Mexico, October 19-21, 1988. Am J Clin Nutr 50(5 Suppl):1121–1235Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lima RM, Bezerra LM, Rabelo HT, Silva MA, Silva AJ, Bottaro M, de Oliveira RJ (2009) Fat-free mass, strength, and sarcopenia are related to bone mineral density in older women. J Clin Densitom 12(1):35–41.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocd.2008.10.003 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lee D-W, Choi E-Y (2016) Sarcopenia as an independent risk factor for decreased BMD in COPD patients: Korean national health and nutrition examination surveys iv and V (2008-2011). PLoS One 11(10):e0164303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Huo YR, Suriyaarachchi P, Gomez F, Curcio CL, Boersma D, Muir SW, Montero-Odasso M, Gunawardene P, Demontiero O, Duque G (2015) Phenotype of osteosarcopenia in older individuals with a history of falling. J Am Med Dir Assoc 16(4):290–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yoshimura N, Muraki S, Oka H, Iidaka T, Kodama R, Horii C, Kawaguchi H, Nakamura K, Akune T, Tanaka S (2018) Do sarcopenia and/or osteoporosis increase the risk of frailty? A 4-year observation of the second and third ROAD study surveys. Osteoporos Int:1–10Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bertolucci PH, Brucki S, Campacci SR, Juliano Y (1994) O mini-exame do estado mental em uma populaçäo geral: impacto da escolaridade. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 52(1):1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shelkey M, Wallace M (1999) Katz index of independence in activities of daily living. J Gerontol Nurs 25(3):8–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gadelha AB, Paiva FML, Gauche R, de Oliveira RJ, Lima RM (2016) Effects of resistance training on sarcopenic obesity index in older women: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 65:168–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Heymsfield SB, Smith R, Aulet M, Bensen B, Lichtman S, Wang J, Pierson R Jr (1990) Appendicular skeletal muscle mass: measurement by dual-photon absorptiometry. Am J Clin Nutr 52(2):214–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gadelha AB, Neri SGR, RJd O, Bottaro M, ACd D, Vainshelboim B, Lima RM (2018) Severity of sarcopenia is associated with postural balance and risk of falls in community-dwelling older women. Exp Aging Res 44:1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0361073x.2018.1449591 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    World Health Organization (1994) Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis: report of a WHO study group. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 843:1–129.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bottaro M, Russo A, Oliveira R (2005) The effects of rest interval on quadriceps torque during an isokinetic testing protocol in elderly. J Sports Sci Med 4(3):285–290PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pereira J, Neri S, Vainshelboim B, Gadelha A, Bottaro M, Oliveira R, Lima R (2019) Normative values of knee extensor isokinetic strength for older women and implications on physical function. J Geriatr Phys Ther.  https://doi.org/10.1519/JPT.0000000000000198
  22. 22.
    Mathias S, Nayak U, Isaacs B (1986) Balance in elderly patients: the “get-up and go” test. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 67(6):387–389PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Vacha-Haase T, Thompson B (2004) How to estimate and interpret various effect sizes. J Couns Psychol 51(4):473–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Binkley N, Buehring B (2009) Beyond FRAX®: It’s time to consider “sarco-osteopenia”. J Clin Densitom 12(4):413–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Paintin J, Cooper C, Dennison E (2018) Osteosarcopenia. Br J Hosp Med 79(5):253–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gentil P, Lima RM, Jaco de Oliveira R, Pereira RW, Reis VM (2007) Association between femoral neck bone mineral density and lower limb fat-free mass in postmenopausal women. J Clin Densitom 10(2):174–178.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocd.2007.01.004 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Walsh MC, Hunter GR, Livingstone MB (2006) Sarcopenia in premenopausal and postmenopausal women with osteopenia, osteoporosis and normal bone mineral density. Osteoporos Int 17(1):61–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Liang MT, Bassin S, Dutto D, Braun W, Wong N, Pontello AM, Cooper DM, Arnaud SB (2007) Bone mineral density and leg muscle strength in young Caucasian, Hispanic, and Asian women. J Clin Densitom 10(2):157–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Di Monaco M, Castiglioni C, Di Monaco R, Tappero R (2017) Association between low lean mass and low bone mineral density in 653 women with hip fracture: does the definition of low lean mass matter? Aging Clin Exp Res 29(6):1271–1276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Gadelha AB, Vainshelboim B, Ferreira AP, Neri SGR, Bottaro M, Lima RM (2018) Stages of sarcopenia and the incidence of falls in older women: a prospective study. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 79:151–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kritz-Silverstein D, Barrett-Connor E (1994) Grip strength and bone mineral density in older women. J Bone Miner Res 9(1):45–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Dixon W, Lunt M, Pye S, Reeve J, Felsenberg D, Silman A, O'neill T (2005) Low grip strength is associated with bone mineral density and vertebral fracture in women. Rheumatology 44(5):642–646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Picca A, Calvani R, Manes-Gravina E, Spaziani L, Landi F, Bernabei R, Marzetti E (2017) Bone-muscle crosstalk: unraveling new therapeutic targets for osteoporosis. Curr Pharm Des 23(41):6256–6263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Morat T, Gilmore KJ, Rice CL (2016) Neuromuscular function in different stages of sarcopenia. Exp Gerontol 81:28–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Huang D-D, Zhou C-J, Wang S-L, Mao S-T, Zhou X-Y, Lou N, Zhang Z, Yu Z, Shen X, Zhuang C-L (2017) Impact of different sarcopenia stages on the postoperative outcomes after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Surgery 161(3):680–693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Bahat G, Bauer J, Boirie Y, Bruyère O, Cederholm T, Cooper C, Landi F, Rolland Y, Sayer AA (2019) Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing 1;48(1):16–31.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afy169
  37. 37.
    Radominski SC, Bernardo W, APd P, Albergaria B-H, Moreira C, Fernandes CE, Castro CH, Zerbini CAF, Domiciano DS, Mendonça L (2017) Brazilian guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Rev Bras Reumatol 57:s452–s466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Cosman F, De Beur S, LeBoff M, Lewiecki E, Tanner B, Randall S, Lindsay R (2014) Clinician’s guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 25(10):2359–2381CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ricardo M. Lima
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ricardo Jacó de Oliveira
    • 1
  • Rafael Raposo
    • 1
  • Silvia Gonçalves Ricci Neri
    • 1
  • André Bonadias Gadelha
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of Physical EducationUniversity of BrasíliaBrasiliaBrazil
  2. 2.Mauá Institute of Research and EducationBrasiliaBrazil

Personalised recommendations