Persistence of and switches from teriparatide treatment among women and men with osteoporosis in the real world: a claims database analysis
This study investigated the real-world persistence rate and switches of teriparatide-treated patients using a claims database in Japan. The persistence rate of teriparatide at 12 months was 34.9%, and approximately one-third of the patients were not treated with any osteoporosis drugs after teriparatide. Improvement in persistence and switches are desired.
We aimed to elucidate the persistence rates and switches before and after teriparatide treatment in real-world osteoporosis patients based on data from a medical claims database in Japan.
We reviewed the records of patients with diagnoses of osteoporosis who were prescribed teriparatide at least once from January 2005 to June 2017. Patients with a follow-up ≤ 90 days before the first and ≤ 90 days after the last prescription of teriparatide were excluded. Discontinuation was defined as no treatment for > 90 days. We investigated treatment duration, compared characteristics of patients with persistence ≤ 12 and > 12 months, and osteoporotic medications before and after teriparatide by weekly or daily teriparatide.
Among the 553 patients extracted for the study, 81.9% were women, 45.6% were aged ≥ 65 years, and 67.3% had a fracture. The most common fracture site was the spine (39.2%). The overall persistence rate of teriparatide > 12 months was 34.9% (weekly, 23.5%; daily, 43.1%). The subjects with persistence > 12 months comprised a higher proportion of women and they had a higher prevalence of rib and sternum fractures than those with ≤ 12 months. After teriparatide, 38.2% were switched to active vitamin D3, 35.1% to bisphosphonates, and 13.7% to denosumab allowing duplication. However, 34.0% of the patients were not switched to any subsequent medication for osteoporosis.
Persistence rate over 12 months of teriparatide treatment was 34.9% in Japan. Approximately one-third of patients had no subsequent treatment immediately after teriparatide. Monitoring persistence and considering subsequent drugs for osteoporosis are necessary for teriparatide treatment.
KeywordsOsteoporosis Teriparatide Persistence Medical claim database
We are deeply grateful to Japan Medical Data Center Co. for assisting with the data preparation.
This study was supported by departmental funding from the Department of Pharmacoepidemiology, Graduate School of Medicine and Public Health, Kyoto University.
Compliance with ethical standards
All data were collected and stored in a password-protected computer database. Individual data were anonymized. The ethical committee of Kyoto University approved the use of these data and the study protocol (approval number R0157). This study was conducted in accordance with the Ethical Guidelines for Medical and Health Research Involving Human Subjects in Japan. Based on these guidelines, the need for additional informed consent was waived.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest directly relevant to the content of this article. The corresponding author received honoraria from Astellas, Taisho Pharmaceutical, Hikari Pharmaceutical, Eisai, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Sanofi K.K.; and consulting fees from Olympus, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Kaken Pharmaceutical, and Otsuka Pharmaceutical. The authors declare no patents, products under development, or marketed products relevant to those companies.
- 10.Neer RM, Arnaud CD, Zanchetta JR, Prince R, Gaich GA, Reginster JY, Hodsman AB, Eriksen EF, Ish-Shalom S, Genant HK, Wang O, Mitlak BH (2001) Effect of parathyroid hormone (1-34) on fractures and bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 344:1434–1341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Greenspan SL, Bone HG, Ettinger MP, Hanley DA, Lindsay R, Zanchetta JR, Blosch CM, Mathisen AL, Morris SA, Marriott TB, Treatment of Osteoporosis with Parathyroid Hormone Study Group (2007) Effect of recombinant human parathyroid hormone (1-84) on vertebral fracture and bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 146:326–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Adachi JD, Hanley DA, Lorraine JK, Yu M (2007) Assessing compliance, acceptance, and tolerability of teriparatide in patients with osteoporosis who fractured while on antiresorptive treatment or were intolerant to previous antiresorptive treatment: an 18-month, multicenter, open-label, prospective study. Clin Ther 29:2055–2067CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Rajzbaum G, Grados F, Evans D, Liu-Leage S, Petto H, Augendre-Ferrante B (2014) Treatment persistence and changes in fracture risk, back pain, and quality of life amongst patients treated with teriparatide in routine clinical care in France: results from the European Forsteo Observational Study. Joint Bone Spine 81:69–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Hodsman AB, Bauer DC, Dempster DW, Dian L, Hanley DA, Harris ST, Kendler DL, McClung MR, Miller PD, Olszynski WP, Orwoll E, Yuen CK (2005) Parathyroid hormone and teriparatide for the treatment of osteoporosis: a review of the evidence and suggested guidelines for its use. Endocr Rev 26:688–703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Mulgund M, Beattie KA, Wong AK, Papaioannou A, Adachi JD (2009) Assessing adherence to teriparatide therapy, causes of nonadherence and effect of adherence on bone mineral density measurements in osteoporotic patients at high risk for fracture. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis 1:5–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Obermayer-Pietsch BM, Marin F, McCloskey EV, Hadji P, Farrerons J, Boonen S, Audran M, Barker C, Anastasilakis AD, Fraser WD, Nickelsen T; EUROFORS Investigators (2008) Effects of two years of daily teriparatide treatment on BMD in postmenopausal women with severe osteoporosis with and without prior antiresorptive treatment. J Bone Miner Res 23:1591–1600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Chan DC, Chang CH, Lim LC, Brnabic AJM, Tsauo JY, Burge R, Hsiao FY, Jin L, Gürbüz S, Yang RS (2016) Association between teriparatide treatment persistence and adherence, and fracture incidence in Taiwan: analysis using the National Health Insurance Research Database. Osteoporos Int 27:2855–2865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.Soen S, Fujiwara S, Takayanagi R, Kajimoto K, Tsujimoto M, Kimura S, Sato M, Krege JH, Enomoto H (2017) Real-world effectiveness of daily teriparatide in Japanese patients with osteoporosis at high risk for fracture: final results from the 24-month Japan Fracture Observational Study (JFOS). Curr Med Res Opin 33:2049–2056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 35.Eastell R, Nickelsen T, Marin F, Barker C, Hadji P, Farrerons J, Audran M, Boonen S, Brixen K, Gomes JM, Obermayer-Pietsch B, Avramidis A, Sigurdsson G, Glüer CC (2009) Sequential treatment of severe postmenopausal osteoporosis after teriparatide: final results of the randomized, controlled European Study of Forsteo (EUROFORS). J Bone Miner Res 24:726–736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 36.Ohtori S, Orita S, Yamauchi K, Eguchi Y, Aoki Y, Nakamura J, Suzuki M, Kubota G, Inage K, Shiga Y, Abe K, Fujimoto K, Kanamoto H, Inoue M, Kinoshita H, Furuya T, Koda M (2017) Does discontinuing teriparatide treatment and replacing it with bisphosphonate maintain the volume of the bone fusion mass after lumbar posterolateral fusion in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis? Asian Spine J 11:272–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar