Archives of Osteoporosis

, 12:29 | Cite as

Cannabis use and bone mineral density: NHANES 2007–2010

  • Donald Bourne
  • Wesley Plinke
  • Elizabeth R. Hooker
  • Carrie M. Nielson
Short Communication

Abstract

Summary

Cannabis use is rising in the USA. Its relationship to cannabinoid signaling in bone cells implies its use could affect bone mineral density (BMD) in the population. In a national survey of people ages 20–59, we found no association between self-reported cannabis use and BMD of the hip or spine.

Introduction

Cannabis is the most widely used illegal drug in the USA, and its recreational use has recently been approved in several US states. Cannabinoids play a role in bone homeostasis. We aimed to determine the association between cannabis use and BMD in US adults.

Methods

In the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2007–2010, 4743 participants between 20 and 59 years old, history of cannabis use was categorized into never, former (previous use, but not in last 30 days), light (1–4 days of use in last 30 days), and heavy (≥5 days of use in last 30 days). Multivariable linear regression was used to test the association between cannabis use and DXA BMD of the proximal femur and lumbar spine with adjustment for age, sex, BMI, and race/ethnicity among other BMD determinants.

Results

Sixty percent of the population reported ever using cannabis; 47% were former users, 5% were light users, and 7% were heavy users. Heavy cannabis users were more likely to be male, have a lower BMI, increased daily alcohol intake, increased tobacco pack-years, and were more likely to have used other illegal drugs (cocaine, heroin, or methamphetamines). No association between cannabis and BMD was observed for any level of use (p ≥ 0.28).

Conclusions

A history of cannabis use, although highly prevalent and related to other risk factors for low BMD, was not independently associated with BMD in this cross-sectional study of American men and women.

Keywords

Cannabis Bone mineral density NHANES Drug use Osteoporosis 

Abbreviations

BMD

bone mineral density

BMI

body mass index

DXA

dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry

NHANES

National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

NCHS

National Center for Health and Statistics

MEC

mobile examination center

References

  1. 1.
    Grucza RA, Agrawal A, Krauss MJ, Cavazos-Rehg PA, Bierut LJ (2016) Recent trends in the prevalence of marijuana use and associated disorders in the United States. JAMA Psychiatry 73(3):300–301CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    National Conference of State Legislatures (2017) Deep dive: marijuana. http://www.ncsl.org/bookstore/state-legislatures-magazine/marijuana-deep-dive.aspx. Retrieved 28 February 2017
  3. 3.
    Hall W, Lynskey M (2016) Evaluating the public health impacts of legalizing recreational cannabis use in the United States. Addiction 111(10):1764–1773CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shariff JA, Ahluwalia KP, Papapanou PN (2017) Relationship between frequent recreational cannabis (marijuana and hashish) use and periodontitis in adults in the United States: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2011 to 2012. J Periodontol 88(3):273-80Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Alshaarawy O, Elbaz HA (2016) Cannabis use and blood pressure levels: United States National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2005-2012. J Hypertens 34(8):1507–1512CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pacher P, Batkai S, Kunos G (2006) The endocannabinoid system as an emerging target of pharmacotherapy. Pharmacol Rev 58(3):389–462CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Whyte LS, Ford L, Ridge SA, Cameron GA, Rogers MJ, Ross RA (2012) Cannabinoids and bone: endocannabinoids modulate human osteoclast function in vitro. Br J Pharmacol 165(8):2584–2597CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ofek O, Karsak M, Leclerc N et al (2006) Peripheral cannabinoid receptor, CB2, regulates bone mass. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103(3):696–701CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Idris AI, van't Hof RJ, Greig IR et al (2005) Regulation of bone mass, bone loss and osteoclast activity by cannabinoid receptors. Nat Med 11(7):774–779CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rajavashisth TB, Shaheen M, Norris KC et al (2012) Decreased prevalence of diabetes in marijuana users: cross-sectional data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) III. BMJ Open 2:e000494CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Smit E, Crespo CJ (2001) Dietary intake and nutritional status of US adult marijuana users: results from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Public Health Nutr 4(3):781–786CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mayet A, Esvan M, Marimoutou C et al (2013) The accuracy of self-reported data concerning recent cannabis use in the French armed forces. Eur J Pub Health 23(2):328–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sophocleous A, Robertson R, Ferreira NB, McKenzie J, Fraser WD, Ralston SH (2016) Heavy Cannabis use is associated with low bone mineral density and an increased risk of fractures. Am J Med. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2016.07.034
  14. 14.
    Siris ES, Chen YT, Abbott TA et al (2004) Bone mineral density thresholds for pharmacological intervention to prevent fractures. Arch Intern Med 164(10):1108–1112CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Idris AI, Ralston SH (2012) Role of cannabinoids in the regulation of bone remodeling. Front Endocrinol 3:1–8Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pertwee RG (2008) The diverse CB1 and CB2 receptor pharmacology of three plant cannabinoids: delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol, cannabidiol and delta9-tetrahydrocannabivarin. Br J Pharmacol 153(2):199–215CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lauckner JE, Jensen JB, Chen HY, Lu HC, Hille B, Mackie K (2008) GPR55 is a cannabinoid receptor that increases intracellular calcium and inhibits M current. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105(7):2699–2704CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Whyte LS, Ryberg E, Sims NA et al (2009) The putative cannabinoid receptor GPR55 affects osteoclast function in vitro and bone mass in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106(38):16511–16516CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bab I, Zimmer A, Melamed E (2009) Cannabinoids and the skeleton: from marijuana to reversal of bone loss. Ann Med 41(8):560–567CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rossi F, Bellini G, Tortora C et al (2015) CB 2 and TRPV 1 receptors oppositely modulate in vitro human osteoblast activity. Pharmacol Res 99:194–201CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nogueira-Filho GR, Todescan S, Shah A, Rosa BT, Tunes Uda R, Cesar Neto JB (2011) Impact of Cannabis sativa (marijuana) smoke on alveolar bone loss: a histometric study in rats. J Periodontol 82(11):1602–1607CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Samir SM, Malek HA (2014) Effect of cannabinoid receptors 1 modulation on osteoporosis in a rat model of different ages. J Physiol Pharmacol 65(5):687–694PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tam J, Ofek O, Fride E et al (2006) Involvement of neuronal cannabinoid receptor CB1 in regulation of bone mass and bone remodeling. Mol Pharmacol 70(3):786–792CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bab I, Zimmer A (2008) Cannabinoid receptors and the regulation of bone mass. Br J Pharmacol 153(2):182–188CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sophocleous A, Idris AI, Ralston SH (2014) Genetic background modifies the effects of type 2 cannabinoid receptor deficiency on bone mass and bone turnover. Calcif Tissue Int 94(3):259–268CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Perel P, Roberts I, Sena E et al (2007) Comparison of treatment effects between animal experiments and clinical trials: systematic review. BMJ 334(7586):197CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Donald Bourne
    • 1
  • Wesley Plinke
    • 1
  • Elizabeth R. Hooker
    • 1
  • Carrie M. Nielson
    • 1
  1. 1.Oregon Health and Science UniversityPortlandUSA

Personalised recommendations