Archives of Osteoporosis

, 12:10 | Cite as

The importance of accurate sample size calculations in clinical trials

  • Jose M. Moran
  • Ignacio Aliaga
  • Juan D. Pedrera-Zamorano


Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest



  1. 1.
    Schiller J, Korallus C, Bethge M, Karst M, Schmalhnofer ML, Gutenbrunner C, Fink MG (2016) Effects of acupuncture on quality of life and pain in patients with osteoporosis—a pilot randomized controlled trial. Arch Osteoporos 11:34. doi: 10.1007/s11657-016-0288-x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A, Sembo I, Redlund-Johnell I, Dawson A, De Laet C, Jonsson B (2000) Long-term risk of osteoporotic fracture in Malmo. Osteoporos Int 11:669–674CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kanis JA, Oden A, Johnell O, De Laet C, Jonsson B (2004) Excess mortality after hospitalisation for vertebral fracture. Osteoporos Int 15:108–112CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pinheiro JC, Bates DM (2000) Mixed-effects models in S and S-plus. Springer-Verlag, New York (NY), p. 3Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Guo Y, Logan HL, Glueck DH, Muller KE (2013) Selecting a sample size for studies with repeated measures. BMC Med Res Methodol 13:100CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jose M. Moran
    • 1
  • Ignacio Aliaga
    • 1
  • Juan D. Pedrera-Zamorano
    • 1
  1. 1.Metabolic Bone Diseases Research Group, Nursing and Occupational Therapy CollegeUniversity of ExtremaduraCáceresSpain

Personalised recommendations