Clinical and economic characteristics of hip fracture patients with and without muscle atrophy/weakness in the United States
- First Online:
- 232 Downloads
This retrospective analysis of hip fracture patients with and without muscle atrophy/weakness (MAW) revealed that those with MAW had significantly higher healthcare utilization and costs compared with hip fracture patients without MAW.
Examine the demographics, clinical characteristics, and healthcare resource utilization and costs of hip fracture patients with and without MAW.
Using a large US claims database, individuals who were newly hospitalized for hip fracture between 1 Jan 2006 and 30 September 2009 were identified. Patients aged 50–64 years with commercial insurance (Commercial) or 65+ years with Medicare supplemental insurance (Medicare) were included. The first hospitalization for hip fracture was defined as the index stay. Patients were categorized into three cohorts: patients with medical claims associated with MAW over the 12 months before the index stay (pre-MAW), patients whose first MAW claim occurred during or over the 12 months after the index stay (post-MAW), and patients without any MAW claim (no-MAW). Multivariate regressions were performed to assess the association between MAW and healthcare costs over the 12-month post-index period, as well as the probability of re-hospitalization.
There were 26,122 Medicare (pre-MAW, 839; post-MAW, 2,761; no-MAW, 22,522) and 5,100 Commercial (pre-MAW, 132; post-MAW, 394; no-MAW, 4,574) hip fracture patients included in this study. Controlling for cross-cohort differences, both the pre-MAW and post-MAW cohorts had significantly higher total healthcare costs (Medicare, $7,308 and $18,753 higher; Commercial, $18,679 and $25,495 higher) than the no-MAW cohort (all p < 0.05) over the 12-month post-index period. The post-MAW cohort in both populations was also more likely to have any all-cause or fracture-related re-hospitalization during the 12-month post-index period.
Among US patients with hip fractures, those with MAW had higher healthcare utilization and costs than patients without MAW.
KeywordsHip fracture Muscle atrophy/weakness Healthcare utilization Costs
- 6.National Center for Health Statistics (US) (2010) “Health, United States, 2009; with special feature on medical technology,” National Center for Health Statistics (US), Hyattsville (MD) JanGoogle Scholar
- 7.American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, “Hip fractures,” aaos.org, [Online]. Available: http://orthoinfo.aaos.org/topic.cfm?topic=A00392Apr 2009
- 8.Butler M, Forte M, Kane R et al (2009) “Treatment of common hip fractures. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US)”, Evidence reports/technology assessments vol. no. 184, AugGoogle Scholar
- 14.The Bureau of Labor Statistics, “Databases, tables & calculators by subject: inflation and prices”Google Scholar
- 15.Greene W H (2002) Econometric analysis, 5th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ, Prentice HallGoogle Scholar
- 17.Efron B, Tibshirani R (1993) An introduction to the bootstrap. Boca Raton, FL, CRC PressGoogle Scholar
- 21.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2010) “National Hospital Discharge Survey: 2006 annual summary,” Vital and Health Statistics Number 168, DecGoogle Scholar
- 22.Pasoto S G, Yoshihara L A K, Maeda L C, Bernik M M S, Lotufo P A, Bonfa E, Pereira R M R (2011) “Osteoporotic hip fractures in non-elderly patients: relevance of associated co-morbidities,” Rheumatol. Int: SepGoogle Scholar
- 29.Burroughs K, Walker K (2012) “Hip fractures in adults,” UpToDate, no. Topic 226, Version 12.0Google Scholar
- 30.Milken Institute, “An unhealthy America: the economic burden of chronic disease.” Santa Monica, CA, Milken Institute 2012Google Scholar
- 33.Dennison E M, Compston J E, Flahive J, Siris E S, Gehlbach S H, Adachi J D, Boonen S, Chapurlat R, Díez-Pérez A, Anderson Jr F A, Hooven F H, Lacroix A Z, Lindsay R, Netelenbos J C, Pfeilschifter J, Rossini M, Roux C, Saag K G, Sambrook P, Silverman S, Watts N B, Greenspan S L , Premaor M, Cooper C (2012) “Effect of co-morbidities on fracture risk: findings from the Global Longitudinal Study of Osteoporosis in Women (GLOW)”. Bone: MarGoogle Scholar
- 40.U. S. C. O. of T (1993) Assessment, hip fracture outcomes in people age 50 and over: mortality, service use, expenditures, and long-term functional impairment. The OfficeGoogle Scholar