Social inequalities in osteoporosis and fracture among community-dwelling older men and women: findings from the Hertfordshire cohort study
- 253 Downloads
It is unknown whether osteoporosis is socially patterned. Using data from the Hertfordshire Cohort Study we found no consistent evidence for social inequalities in prevalent or incident fracture, bone mineral density or loss rates, or bone strength. Public health strategies for prevention of osteoporosis should focus on the whole population.
Osteoporosis and osteoporotic fracture are major public health issues for society; the burden for the affected individual is also high. It is unclear whether osteoporosis and osteoporotic fracture are socially patterned.
This study aims to analyse social inequalities in osteoporosis and osteoporotic fracture among the 3,225 community-dwelling men and women, aged 59–73 years, who participated in the Hertfordshire Cohort Study (HCS), UK.
A panel of markers of bone health (fracture since 45 years of age; DXA bone mineral density and loss rate at the total femur; pQCT strength strain indices for the radius and tibia; and incident fracture) were analysed in relation to the social circumstances of the HCS participants (characterised at the individual level by: age left full time education; current social class; housing tenure and car availability).
We found little strong or consistent evidence among men, or women, for social inequalities in prevalent or incident fracture, DXA bone mineral density, bone loss rates, or pQCT bone strength, with or without adjustment for age, anthropometry, lifestyle and clinical characteristics.
Reduced car availability at baseline was associated with lower pQCT radius and tibia strength strain indices at follow-up among men only (p = 0.02 radius and p < 0.01 tibia unadjusted; p = 0.05 radius and p = 0.01 tibia, adjusted for age, anthropometry, lifestyle and clinical characteristics).
Our results suggest that fracture and osteoporosis do not have a strong direct social gradient and that public health strategies for prevention and treatment of osteoporosis should continue to focus on the whole population.
KeywordsOsteoporosis Osteoporotic fracture Socio-economic position Material deprivation Social inequalities
This work was supported by the Medical Research Council & University of Southampton UK.
- 3.Melton LJ, III, Chrischilles EA, Cooper C, Lane AW, Riggs BL. How many women have osteoporosis? JBMR Anniversary Classic. JBMR, Volume 7, Number 9, 1992. J Bone Miner Res 2005 May;20:886-92.Google Scholar
- 5.Walker-Bone K, Dennison E, Cooper C (2001) Osteoporosis. In: Silman AJ, Hochberg M (eds) Epidemiology of the rheumatic diseases, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 259–92Google Scholar
- 11.Brennan SL, Pasco JA, Urquhart DM, Oldenburg B, Hanna F, Wluka AE (2009) The association between socioeconomic status and osteoporotic fracture in population-based adults: a systematic review. Osteoporos Int 20(9):1487–1497, Date of Publication: September 2009(9):SeptemberPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Lohman TG, Roche AF, Martorell R (1988) Anthropometric standardization reference manual. Human Kinetic Books, ChampaignGoogle Scholar
- 22.Office of Population Censuses and Surveys (1990) Standard occupational classification, Vol 1 Structure and definition of major, minor and unit groups. HMSO, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 23.Elias P, Halstead K, Prandy K (1993) Computer assisted standard occupational coding. HMSO, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 27.Hamilton T, Lambert S, Willett K. Proximal femoral fracture and socioeconomic status. Osteoporosis International Conference: Osteoporosis Conference 2010 Liverpool United Kingdom Conference Start: 20101128 Conference End: 20101201 Conference Publication: (var pagings) 21 (pp S515-S516), 2010 Date of Publication: November 2010(var.pagings):November.Google Scholar
- 28.Dugue A, Greenbank C, Evans B, Diggle P, Goodson N, Halsey J, et al. Increasing deprivation and osteoporosis: Further analysis adjusting for geographical and physical variables. Rheumatology Conference: Rheumatology 2010—British Society for Rheumatology, BSR and British Health Professionals in Rheumatology, BHPR Annual Meeting 2010 Birmingham United Kingdom Conference Start: 20100420 Conference End: 20100423 Conference Publi(var.pagings):AprilGoogle Scholar
- 30.Clark E, Cuming M, Gould V, Morrison L, Tobias J. Risk factors for fractures over aged 50 in a population-based cohort of older women. Osteoporosis International Conference: Osteoporosis Conference 2010 Liverpool United Kingdom Conference Start: 20101128 Conference End: 20101201 Conference Publication: (var pagings) 21 (pp S446-S447), 2010 Date of Publication: November 2010(var.pagings):NovemberGoogle Scholar
- 38.Wilson RT, Chase GA, Chrischilles EA, Wallace RB (2006) Hip fracture risk among community-dwelling elderly people in the United States: a prospective study of physical, cognitive, and socioeconomic indicators. Am J Public Health 96(7):1210–1218, Date of Publication: Jul 2006(7):JulPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 42.APHO and Department of Health. Health Profile 2008—Hertfordshire. http://www apho org uk/resource/item aspx?RID = 52400 2008
- 43.Ismail AA, O'Neill TW, Cockerill W, Finn JD, Cannata JB, Hoszowski K et al (2000) Validity of self-report of fractures: results from a prospective study in men and women across Europe. EPOS study group. European prospective osteoporosis study group. Osteoporos Int 11(3):248–54PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar