Skip to main content
Log in

Analgesic Effects of Two Types of Spinal Manipulation in Acute Lumbar Radiculopathy Model Rats

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To compare the analgesic effects of two types of spinal manipulation (SM) in acute lumbar radiculopathy (ALR) model rats induced by self-transplantation of autologous nucleus pulposus (ANP), and clarify the therapeutic mechanism.

Methods

Totally 108 male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into 6 groups by a random number table (18 rats in each group), including a blank group with no interference, a sham operation group with a surgery by making a local soft tissue incision on the left side of L5–6 vertebral segment, a model group with ALR of L5 extraforaminal nerve by ANP self-transplantation without other interference, a sham manipulation (SMA) group with simulating physical rotation, as well as a mobilization (MOB) group with simulating low-velocity and variable-amplitude rotation and a manipulation (MAN) group with simulating high-velocity and low-amplitude rotation. The interventions in SMA, MOB, and MAN groups started 1 day after modeling followed by another 5 treatments at days 3, 5, 8, 10 and 12. Rats in the other 3 groups did not receive any special intervention. Behavioral pain tests of 50% mechanical pain withdrawal threshold (50% PWT) and paw withdrawal latency (PWL) were conducted 1 day before operation followed by another 10 tests on days 1–7, 10, 12 and 14. Immunohistochemical expression of nitric oxide synthase (NOS) was investigated on days 5 and 12 after operation.

Results

After 3 experimental SM interventions, 50% PWT and PWL were higher in the MAN group than the SMA group on days 6 and 7, and higher on days 10, 12 and 14 postoperatively (P<0.05 or P<0.01), while the same indices were significantly higher in the MOB group than MAN group on days 1–4 (P<0.05 or P<0.01). The expression of NOS was lower in the MAN and MOB groups than SMA group on day 12 postoperatively (P<0.01).

Conclusions

Both manipulation and mobilization produced better results than sham interference in relieving pain by reducing neuroinflammation possibly. At the early period, compared with manipulation, mobilization presented less sensitive response to pain until later visit. SM may inhibit the overexpression of NOS, thereby alleviating severe radiculopathy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Feng TY, ed. Clinical study on the treatment of soft tissue injury with integrated Chinese and Western medicine. Beijing: China Science and Technology Press; 2002:33–35.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang MC, Zhan HS, Shi YY, Huang SY, Wang X. Diagnosis and treatment of intervertebral disc disease based on the theory of “Gucuofeng and Jinchucao”. Chin J Orthop Trauma (Chin) 2008;21:441–445.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang MC, Zhan HS, Shi YY, Chen YW, Wang X, Huang SY. Systematic research on joint semi-dislocation and sinews offposition. Shanghai J Tradit Chin Med (Chin) 2009;43:59–63.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Zhu QG, Fang M, Pan L, Gu LX, Shen GQ, Chen YW, et al. Effects of tuina manipulation on the three-dimensional space of cervical vertebral segments of cervical spondylosis patients. Chin J Integr Tradit West Med (Chin) 2012;32:922–925.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Leong DJ, Sun HB. Mechanical loading: potential preventive and therapeutic strategy for osteoarthritis. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2014;22:465–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Julita AT, Stephen I, Richard R. Spinal manipulative therapy reduces inflammatory cytokines but not substance P production in normal subjects. J Manipulat Physiol Ther 2006;29:14–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sluka KA, Skyba DA, Radhakrihnan R, Leeper BJ, Wright A. Joint mobilization reduces hyperalgesia associated with chronic muscle and joint inflammation in rats. J Pain 2006;7:602–607.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Song XJ, Gan Q, Cao JL, Wang ZB, Rupert RL. Spinal manipulation reduces pain and hyperalgesia after lumbar intervertebral foramen inflammation in the rat. J Manip Physiol Ther 2006;29:5–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Parvaneh M, Antonio G, Chris T, Thomas H. Areas of capsaicin-induced secondary hyperalgesla and allodynia are deduced by a single chiropractic adjustment: a preliminary study. J Manip Physiol Ther 2004;27:381–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Onifer SM, Sozio RS, DiCarlo DM, Li Q, Donahue RR, Taylor BK, et al. Spinal manipulative therapy reduces peripheral neuropathic pain in the rat. Neuroreport 2018;29:191–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Brisby H. Pathology and possible mechanisms of nervous system response to disc degeneration. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006;88(Suppl 2):68–71.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tang JG, Yuan W, Hou SX, Wu WW, Shang WL. Roles of mechanical compression and non-compression in experimental radiculopathy. Chin J Spine Spinal Cord (Chin) 2006;16:865–868.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fayad F, Lefevre-Colau MM, Rannou F, Quintero N, Nys A, Mace Y, et al. Relation of inflammatory modic changes to intradiscal steroid injection outcome in chronic low back pain. Eur Spine J 2007;16:925–931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Takahashi N, Kikuchi S, Shubayev VI, Campana WM, Myers RR. TNF-alpha and phosphorylation of ERK in DRG and spinal cord: insight into mechanisms of sciatica. Spine 2006;31:523–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhao P. Recent study on the mechanism of Western spinal manipulation. Chin J Orthop Trauma (Chin) 2011;24:705–709.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bronfort G, Haas M, Evans RL, Bouter LM. Efficacy of spinal manipulation and mobilization for low back pain and neck pain: a systematic review and best evidence synthesis. Spine J 2004;4:335–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bronfort G, Haas M, Evans R, Kawchuk G, Dagenais S. Evidence-informed management of chronic low back pain with spinal manipulation and mobilization. Spine J 2008;8:213–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Han L, Zhao P, Guo W, Wei J, Li Y, Min YQ, et al. A rat model of sciatica induced by autologous nucleus pulposus implant at outlet of lumbar intervertebral foramen. Beijing J Tradit Chin Med (Chin) 2015;34:245–248.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Chaplan SR, Bach FW, Pogrel JW, Chung JM, Yaksh TL. Quantitative assessment of tactile allodynia in the rat paw. J Neurosci Methods 1994;53:55–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Dixon WJ. Efficient analysis of experimental observations. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 1980;20:441–462.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hargreares K, Dubner R, Brown F, Flores C, Joris J. A new and sensitive method for measuring thermal nociception in cutaneous hyperalgesia. Pain 1988;32:77–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Vergnolle N, Cenac N, Altier C, Cellars L, Chapman K, Zamponi GW, et al. A role for transient receptor potential vanilloid 4 in tonicity-induced neurogenic inflammation. British J Pharmacol 2010;159:1161–1173.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kawakami M, Tamaki T, Weinstein JN, Hashizume H, Nishi H, Meller ST. Pathomechanism of pain-related behavior produced by allografts of intervertebral disc in the rat. Spine 1996;21:2101–2107.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sasaki N, Kikuchi S, Konno S, Sekiguchi M, Watanabe K. Anti-TNF-alpha antibody reduces pain-behavioral changes induced by epidural application of nucleus pulposus in a rat model depending on the timing of administration. Spine 2007;32:413–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tang JG, Yuan W, Wang XW, Hou SX, Shang WL. Establishment of a new animal model of discogenic sciatic nerve pain. J Spin Surg 2008;6:144–147.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wei M, Zhang JJ, He QL, Wang L, Ren ZH, Liu XG, et al. Establishment of a new model of sciatic neuralgia induced by lumbar intervertebral disc herniation and a method of epidural catheterization. Chin J Pain Med (Chin) 2011;17:744–748.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Brisby H, Byrod G, Olmarker K, Miller VM, Aoki Y, Rydevik B. Nitric oxide as a mediator of nucleus pulposus-induced effects on spinal nerve roots. J Orthop Res 2000;18:815–820.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Borsani E, Giovannozzi S, Cocchi MA, Boninsegna R, Rezzani R, Rodella LF. Endothelial nitric oxide synthase in dorsal root ganglia during chronic inflammatory nociception. Cells Tissue Org 2013;197:159–168.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Kawakami M, Matsumoto T, Hashizume H, Kuribayashi K, Tamaki T. Epidural injection of cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor attenuates pain-related behavior following application of nucleus pulposus to the nerve root in the rat. Orthop Res 2002;20:376–381.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Han L and Zhao P designed the study; Han L, Wei J, Wang F and Li Y performed the experiments and wrote the manuscript; Han X and Han L completed the modeling and collected the data; Guo GJ analyzed the data; Zhao P revised the manuscript. All authors read and agreed the final version for publication.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ping Zhao.

Additional information

Conflict of Interest

All the authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Supported by Youth Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81503602)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Han, L., Zhao, P., Han, X. et al. Analgesic Effects of Two Types of Spinal Manipulation in Acute Lumbar Radiculopathy Model Rats. Chin. J. Integr. Med. 28, 518–523 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11655-021-3276-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11655-021-3276-y

Keywords

Navigation