Patient feedback for acupuncture practice improvement: A survey from Mayo Clinic
- 66 Downloads
To understand patient satisfaction with acupuncture appointment duration for the first and subsequent appointments in the plan of care, time spent with the acupuncture provider, willingness to pay for longer duration appointments, and lack of insurance coverage.
Patients who were referred for an acupuncture consult to the Center for Integrative Medicine at Mayo Clinic were asked to participate in the survey in August 2014. Patients were given paper survey at time of appointment check-in and entered into Research Electronic Data Capture Survey database tool to reveal patient-reported outcomes.
In total, 104 of 329 patients receiving acupuncture treatment responded to the survey with a 32% response rate. Insight and recommended changes to the duration of the initial and subsequent appointments were obtained. Most patients reported that time spent with the provider (76 cases, 74%) and appointment length (74 cases, 68%) were "just right". Seventy cases (70%) of respondents indicated that they wanted longer treatment. Patients reported return appointments with duration of 30 min was not enough. Fifty-three patients (62%) were willing to pay for additional costs not covered by insurance.
We used patient feedback to assess the acupuncture practice in a complementary and integrative medicine program. Most patients referred for the acupuncture consult appeared to be satisfied with the current level of practice. These findings were used to establish a quality improvement plan that may be implemented to improve patient satisfaction with the acupuncture practice.
Keywordscare survey health integrative medicine acupuncture practice
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Clarke TC, Black LI, Stussman BJ, Barnes PM, Nahin RL. Trends in the use of complementary approaches among adults: United States, 2002-2012. Natl Health Stat Report 2015;79:1–16.Google Scholar
- 13.Zhao XF, Hu HT, Li JS, Shang HC, Zheng HZ, Niu JF, et al. Is acupuncture effective for hypertension? A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2015;10:e0127019.Google Scholar
- 21.Velikova G, Keding A, Harley C, Cocks K, Booth L, Smith AB, et al. Patients report improvements in continuity of care when quality of life assessments are used routinely in oncology practice: secondary outcomes of a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Cancer 2010;46:2381–2388.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 23.Bowie P, McNab D, Ferguson J, de Wet C, Smith G, MacLeod M, et al. Quality improvement and person-centredness: a participatory mixed methods study to develop the 'always event' concept for primary care. BMJ Open 2015;5:e006667.Google Scholar
- 26.Mueller PS. Teaching and assessing professionalism in medical learners and practicing physicians. Rambam Maimonides Med J 2015;6:e0011.Google Scholar
- 27.Mueller PS. Author's reply to professionalism: the role of quality improvement. Rambam Maimonides Med J 2015;6. doi: 10.5041/RMMJ.10220.Google Scholar
- 38.McLachlan SA, Allenby A, Matthews J, Wirth A, Kissane D, Bishop M, et al. Randomized trial of coordinated psychosocial interventions based on patient selfassessments versus standard care to improve the psychosocial functioning of patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol 2001;19:4117–4125.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 39.Zheng H, Li W, Harrold L, Ayers DC, Franklin PD. Webbased comparative patient-reported outcome feedback to support quality improvement and comparative effectiveness research in total joint replacement. EGEMS (Wash DC) 2014;2:1130.Google Scholar