Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine

, Volume 20, Issue 5, pp 336–340

Traditional East Asian medicine: How to understand and approach diagnostic findings and patterns in a modern scientific framework?

Feature Article


Research into the diagnostic methods and patterns of traditional East Asian medical (TEAM) systems of practice such as acupuncture and herbal medicine face certain challenges due to the nature of thinking in TEAM and the subjective basis of judgments made in practice. The TEAM-based diagnosis can take into account various findings and signs such as the appearance of the tongue, palpable qualities of the radial pulses, palpable qualities and findings on the abdomen, the complexion of the patient and so on. Both diagnostic findings and the patterns of diagnosis cannot be assumed to have objective bases or to be causally related to the complaints of the patient. However, the diagnoses of TEAM based acupuncture and herbal medicine have tended to look at pictures of the whole patient and rather than focus on a particular symptom, they have looked across a myriad of signs and symptoms to decide or identify the ‘pattern’ of diagnosis according to the theory in question. Although open for selective and subjective biases each diagnosis pattern always comes with a prescribed treatment tailored to the pattern. Further, the same research requirements needed for the validation of the diagnoses are needed also for these clinical observations and judgments. Hence, it is necessary, albeit challenging for research on TEAM diagnoses to first address these issues before proceeding to more complex investigations such as the development of instruments for making diagnostic observations, instruments for forming diagnostic conclusions or studies investigating the physiological bases of the diagnostic patterns. Preliminary work has started and instruments have been made, but we suggest that any instrumentation must necessarily be first validated by matching of the calibrated or scaled observations or judgments to observations made and agreed upon by relevant experts. Reliability of all observations and judgments are needed before any other tool, technology or more advanced approach can proceed and also whenever the natural system of diagnosis-treatment is applied in clinical trials. In this paper the authors highlight the core problems and describe a step wise process for addressing them.


research diagnosis diagnostic methods pattern identification reliability traditional East Asian medical systems 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    O’Brien KA, Birch S. A review of the reliability of traditional East Asian medicine diagnoses. J Altern Complement Med 2009;15:353–366.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Buriani A, Garcia-Bermejo ML, Bosisio E, Xu QH, Li HG, Dong XB, et al. Omic techniques in systems biology approaches to traditional Chinese medicine research: Present and future. J Ethnopharmacol 2012;140:535–544.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dai JY, Sun SJ, Cao HJ, Zheng NN, Wang WY, Gou XJ, et al. Applications of new technologies and new methods in ZHENG differentiation. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2012;2012:298014.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jiang M, Lu C, Zhang C, Yang J, Tan Y, Lu AP, et al. Syndrome differentiation in modern research of traditional Chinese medicine. J Ethnopharmacol 2012;140:634–642.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chae Y, Chang DS, Lee SH, Jung WM, Lee IS, Jackson S, et al. Inserting needles into the body: a meta-analysis of brain activity associated with acupuncture needle stimulation. J Pain 2013;14:215–222.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Han JS. Physiology of acupuncture: a review of thirty years of research. J Altern Complement Med 1997;3(suppl 1):101–108.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Huang W, Pach D, Napadow V, Park K, Long X, Neumann J, et al. Characterizing acupuncture stimuli using brain imaging with FMRI-a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. PLoS One 2012;7(4):e32960.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kawakita K, Shinbara H, Imai K, Fukuda F, Yano T, Kuriyama K. How do acupuncture and moxibustion act? — Focusing on the progress in Japanese acupuncture research. J Pharmacol Sci 2006;100:443–459.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pomeranz B, Berman B. Scientific basis of acupuncture. In: G Stux, B Berman, B Pomeranz. Basics of acupuncture. 15th ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2003:1–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhang JG, Wang XM, McAlonan GM. Neural acupuncture unit: a new concept for interpreting effects and mechanisms of acupuncture. Evid Based Complement Altern Med 2012;2012:429412.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    MRC, Medical Research Council. A framework for development and evaluation of RCTs for complex interventions to improve health. Online document at: Posted in 2000Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Mitchie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ 2008;337:979–983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Paterson C, Dieppe P. Characteristic and incidental (placebo) effects in complex interventions such as acupuncture. BMJ 2005;330:1202–1205.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Price S, Long AF, Godfrey M, Thomas KJ. Getting inside acupuncture trials-exploring intervention theory and rationale. BMC Complement Altern Med 2011;11:22.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Price S, Mercer SW, MacPherson H. Practitioner empathy, patient enablement and health outcomes: a prospective study of acupuncture patients. Patient Educ Couns 2006;63(1–2):239–245.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Birch S, Felt R. Understanding acupuncture. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1999.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wiseman N, Feng Y. A Practical Dictionary of Chinese Medicine. Brookline: Paradigm Publications; 1997.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Birch S, Lewith G. Acupuncture research, the story so far. In MacPherson H, Hammerschlag R, Lewith G, Schnyer R, eds. Acupuncture research: Strategies for building an evidence base. London: Elsevier; 2007:15–35.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Unschuld PU. Medicine in China: a history of ideas. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1985.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Birch S, Bovey M. Qi [氣], Jingmai [經脈]: Scientific investigation of concepts based in traditional East Asian medicine: challenges to cross-paradigm research. In Birch S, Cabrer Mir MA, Rodriguez M, eds. Restoring order in health and Chinese medicine: Studies of the development and use of qi and the channels. 2014.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Birch S. Testing the claims of traditionally based acupuncture. Complement Ther Med 1997;5:147–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    MacPherson H, Sherman K, Hammerschlag R, Birch S, Lao L, Zaslawski C. The clinical evaluation of East Asian systems of medicine. Clin Acup Orient Med 2002:3:16–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Luo CH, Chung YF, Yeh CC, Si XC, Chang CC, Hu CS, et al. String like pulse quantification study by pulse wave in 3D pulse mapping. J Altern Complement Med 2012;18:924–931.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Chiu CC. A novel approach based on computerized image analysis for traditional Chinese medical diagnosis of the tongue. Computer Methods Prog Biomed 2000;61:77–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Chen RQ, Wong CM, Lam TH. Construction of a traditional Chinese medicine syndrome-specific outcome measure: the Kidney deficiency syndrome questionnaire (KDSQ). BMC Complement Altern Med 2012;12:73.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ryu HH, Lee HJ, Kim HG, Kim JG. Reliability and validity of a cold-heat pattern questionnaire for traditional Chinese medicine. J Altern Complement Med 2010;16:663–667.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Amaral LAN, Diaz-Guilera A, Moreira AA, Goldberger AL, Lipsitz LA. Emergence of complex dynamics in a simple model of signaling networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004;101:15551–15555.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ivanov PCH, Amaral LAN, Goldberger AL, Stanley HE. Stochastic feedback and the regulation of biological rhythms. Europhys Lett 1998;43:363–368.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mackey MC, Glass L. Oscillations and chaos in physiological control systems. Science 1977;197:287–289.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Goldberger AL. Non-linear dynamics for clinicians: chaos theory. Fractals and complexity at the bedside. Lancet 1996;347:1312–1314.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Goldberger AL, Amaral LAN, Glass L, Hausdorff JM, Ivanov PCh, Mark RG, et al. Physiobank, physiotoolkit, and physionet: Components of a new research resource for complex physiologic signals. Circulation 2000;101(23):e215–e220.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Goldberger AL, Amaral LAN, Hausdorff JM, Ivanov PC, Peng CK, Stanley HE. Fractal dynamics in physiology: Alterations with disease and aging. Proc Nat Acad Sci 2002;99(suppl 1):2466–2472.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Goldberger AL, Rigney DR, West BJ. Chaos and fractals in human physiology. Sci Am 1990;262:42–49.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Peng CK, Hausdorff JM, Goldberger AL. Fractal mechanisms in neural control: human heartbeat and gait dynamics in health and disease. In: Walleczek J, ed. Self-organized biological dynamics and nonlinear control. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ahn AC, Tewari M, Poon CS, Phillips RS. The limits of reductionism in medicine: could systems biology offer an alternative? PLoS Med 2006;3(6):e208.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ahn AC, Tewari M, Poon CS, Phillips RS. The clinical application of a systems approach. PLoS Med 2006;3(7):e209.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Chen R, Mias GI, Li-Pook-Than J, Jiang JH, Lam HYK, Chen R, et al. Personal omics profiling reveals dynamic molecular and medical phenotypes. Cell 2012;148:1293–1307.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Hamburg MA, Collins FS. The path to personalized medicine. New Engl J Med 2010;363:301–304.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Nicholson JK. Global systems biology, personalized medicine and molecular epidemiology. Mol Syst Biol 2006;2:52.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Zhang GG, Lee WL, Bausell B, Lao LX, Handwerger B, Berman B. Variability in the traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) diagnoses and herbal prescriptions provided by three TCM practitioners for 40 patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Altern Complement Med 2005;11:415–421.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Zhang GG, Singh B, Lee WL, Handwerger B, Lao LX, Berman L. Improvement of agreement in TCM diagnosis among TCM practitioners for persons with the conventional diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis: effect of training. J Altern Complement Med 2008;14:381–386.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Aird M, Coyle ME, Cobbin DM, Zaslawski CJ. A study of the comparative accuracy of two methods of locating acupuncture points. Acup Med 2000;18:15–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Rivers WE, Zollman F. Reliability of surface acupuncture point location. Med Acup 2013;25:134–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Chinese Association of the Integration of Traditional and Western Medicine and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University College of Health Sciences -Campus KristianiaOsloNorway
  2. 2.National Research Centre in Complementary and Alternative MedicineUiT The Arctic University of NorwayTromsoNorway

Personalised recommendations