LO SCALPELLO-OTODI Educational

, Volume 23, Issue 1, pp 70–75 | Cite as

Fratture dell’estremo prossimale dell’omero e protesi di spalla: trattamento riabilitativo

  • F. Inglese
  • D. Creta
  • M. Biondi
Aggiornamenti

Proximal humeral fracture and shoulder artroplasty: Rehabilitation treatment

Abstract

The proximal humeral fractures need a specific and specialist rehabilitation approach for their treatment, both for conservative or after shoulder artroplasty surgical implant. There are many factors that may influence the final recovery of the patient; the localization of the fracture (intra or extra capsular fracture), its size, the extent of the trauma, the general clinical conditions of the patient, the quality of the shoulder tissue and its personal ability to heal, the rehabilitative tecniques used, patient motivations and psicological aspects and how much time the patient have got to spend to follow the rehabilitation project to reach specific functional goals.

The ROM deficit is the more common complication after proximal humeral fracture. The causes may be lack of articular congruence (stabilized meccanical rigidity without pain) or retraction of the capsulo ligament structures (changeable tissutal rigidity with pain). In most clinical situations (except prosthesis) an early passive articular mobilization in a safe range of motion (reduced ROM, on a scapular plane and avoiding rotations) will be usefull, postponing active mobilization and muscolar reinforce when there will be a safe clinical and radiological heal of the fracture or the prosthesis implant will be stable.

The rehabilitation treatment of the patient that underwent surgical procedure of prosthesis implant (total shoulder arthroplasty, endoprosthesis, reverse shoulder arthroplasty, resurfacing prosthesis) needs in any case to avoid manual traction of the gleno humeral articulation or articular pompages, manual stabilizzation of the scapula, and in the first post surgery month to save humerous from rotations.

In the end the clinical monitoring of many parameters (range of motion, muscolar force and endurance, coordinated skills, sportive gesture, daily living activity and functionality) using validated clinical tests (isokinetic and isometric tests, aerobic and anaerobic thereshold, scale to evaluate the functionality and the state of psychological health) will permit to understand if and at wich level the functional goals have been reached and will allow to observe far off the functional outcome.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliografia

  1. 1.
    Porcellini G, Campi F, Paladini P (2005) La riabilitazione nelle protesi di spalla. In: Porcellini G, Campi F, Paladini P (Eds.) La protesi di spalla nell’artrosi gleno-omerale. Timeo, Bologna pp 235–262Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Golec E, Nowak S, Golec J et al (2006) Proximal humerus fractures analysis of treatment and rehabilitation outcomes. Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol 71:221–226PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Levy O, Copeland SA (2004) Cementless surface replacement arthroplasty (Copeland CSRA) for osteoarthritis of the shoulder. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 13:266–271CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rockwood CA Jr., Matsen F (2000) La spalla, vol. II. Verduci, RomaGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Orfaly RM, Rockwood CA Jr., Esenyel CZ, Wirth MA (2007) Shoulder arthroplasty in cases with avascular necrosis of the humeral head. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 16[Suppl 3]:27–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hodgson S (2006) Proximal humerus fracture rehabilitation. Clin Orthop 442:131–138PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lefevre-Colau MM, Babinet A, Fayad F et al (2007) Immediate mobilization compared with conventional immobilization for the impacted nonoperatively treated proximal humeral fracture. A randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:2582–2590CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gruson KI, Ruchelsman DE, Tejwani NC (2008) Isolated tuberosity fractures of the proximal humeral: current concepts. Injury 39:284–298CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Amirfeyz R, Sarangi P (2008) Shoulder hemiarthroplasty for fracture with a conservative rehabilitation regime. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 128:985–988CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bryant D, Litchfield R, Sandow M et al (2005) A comparison of pain, strength, range of motion, and functional outcomes after hemiarthroplasty and total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with osteoarthritis of the shoulder. A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:1947–1956CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. Inglese
    • 1
  • D. Creta
    • 2
  • M. Biondi
    • 3
  1. 1.Fisioterapista ForlìCommissione Fisiatrica SICGeGForlìItaly
  2. 2.Fisioterapista ForlìForlìItaly
  3. 3.Fisiatra BolognaCommissione Fisiatrica SICGeGBolognaItaly

Personalised recommendations