Advertisement

Model-based approach for household clustering with mixed scale variables

  • Christian Carmona
  • Luis Nieto-BarajasEmail author
  • Antonio Canale
Regular Article
  • 158 Downloads

Abstract

The Ministry of Social Development in Mexico is in charge of creating and assigning social programmes targeting specific needs in the population for the improvement of the quality of life. To better target the social programmes, the Ministry is aimed to find clusters of households with the same needs based on demographic characteristics as well as poverty conditions of the household. Available data consists of continuous, ordinal, and nominal variables, all of which come from a non-i.i.d complex design survey sample. We propose a Bayesian nonparametric mixture model that jointly models a set of latent variables, as in an underlying variable response approach, associated to the observed mixed scale data and accommodates for the different sampling probabilities. The performance of the model is assessed via simulated data. A full analysis of socio-economic conditions in households in the Mexican State of Mexico is presented.

Keywords

Bayes nonparametrics Complex design Latent variables Multivariate normal Poisson–Dirichlet process 

Mathematics Subject Classification

62D05 62G86 62P25 62H30 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the constructive comments of a guest editor and two anonymous referees. The first author acknowledges support from Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología, Mexico. The second author acknowledges support from Asociación Mexicana de Cultura, A. C. Mexico. The third author is also affiliated with the Collegio Carlo Alberto and acknowledges support of Grant CPDA154381/15 from the University of Padua, Italy.

References

  1. Bandyopadhyay D, Canale A (2016) Non-parametric spatial models for clustered ordered periodontal data. J R Stat Soc Ser C 65:619–640MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Banfield JD, Raftery AE (1993) Model-based Gaussian and non-Gaussian clustering. Biometrics 49:803–821MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnard J, McCulloch R, Meng X-L (2000) Modeling covariance matrices in terms of standard deviations and correlations, with application to shrinkage. Stat Sin 10:1281–1311MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Barrios E, Lijoi A, Nieto-Barajas LE, Prünster I (2013) Modeling with normalized random measure mixture models. Stat Sci 28:313–334MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Box GEP, Cox DR (1964) An analysis of transformations (with discussion). J R Stat Soc B 26:211–252MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Cai JH, Song XY, Lam KH, Ip EH (2011) A mixture of generalized latent variable models for mixed mode and heterogeneous data. Comput Stat Data Anal 55:2889–2907MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Canale A, Dunson DB (2011) Bayesian kernel mixtures for counts. J Am Stat Assoc 106:1528–1539MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Canale A, Dunson DB (2015) Bayesian multivariate mixed-scale density estimation. Stat Interface 8:195–201MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Canale A, Scarpa B (2016) Bayesian nonparametric location-scale-shape mixtures. Test 25:113–130MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Carmona C, Nieto-Barajas LE (2017) Package BNPMIXcluster. R package version 1.2.0Google Scholar
  11. Chambers RL, Skinner CJ (2003) Analysis of survey data. Wiley, ChichesterCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. CONEVAL (2009) Metodología para la medición multidimensional de la pobreza en México. Consejo Nacional de Evaluación de la Política de Desarrollo Social, México. http://www.coneval.org.mx/rw/resource/Metodologia_Medicion_Multidimensional.pdf (in Spanish)
  13. Dahl DB (2006) Model-based clustering for expression data via a Dirichlet process mixture model. In: Vanucci M, Do K-A, Müller P (eds) Bayesian inference for gene expression and proteomics. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  14. Everitt BS (1988) A finite mixture models for the clustering of mixed-mode data. Stat Probab Lett 6:305–309MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ferguson TS (1973) A Bayesian analysis of some nonparametric problems. Ann Stat 1:209–230MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Fernández D, Arnold R, Pledger S (2016) Mixture-based clustering for the ordered stereotype model. Comput Stat Data Anal 93:46–75MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. Ishwaran H, James LF (2001) Gibbs sampling methods for stick-breaking priors. J Am Stat Assoc 96:161–173MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. Kingman JFC (1975) Random discrete distributions. J R Stat Soc B 37:1–22MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. Kottas A, Müller P, Quintana F (2005) Nonparametric Bayesian modeling for multivariate ordinal data. J Comput Graph Stat 14:610–625MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Leon-Novelo LG, Zhou X, Nebiyou Bekele B, Müller P (2010) Assessing toxicities in a clinical trial: Bayesian inference for ordinal data nested within categories. Biometrics 66:966–974MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. Lumley T (2010) Complex surveys. Wiley, HobokenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McLachlan GJ, Basford KE (1988) Mixture models: inference and applications to clustering. Marcel Dekker, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. McParland D, Claire Gormley I, McCormick TH, Clark SJ, Whiteson Kabudula C, Collinson MA (2014) Clustering South African households based on their asset status using latent variable models. Ann Appl Stat 8:747–776MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. Navarrete C, Quintana FA, Müller P (2008) Some issues in nonparametric Bayesian modeling using species sampling models. Stat Model 8:3–21MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nieto-Barajas LE, Contreras-Cristán A (2014) A Bayesian nonparametric approach for time series clustering. Bayesian Anal 9:147–170MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. Norets A, Pelenis J (2012) Bayesian modeling of joint and conditional distributions. J Econom 168:332–346MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. Pitman J (1995) Exchangeable and partially exchangeable random partitions. Probab Theory Relat Fields 102:145–158MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. Pledger S, Arnold R (2014) Multivariate methods using mixtures: correspondence amalysis, scaling and pattern-detection. Comput Stat Data Anal 71:241–261CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. Pitman J, Yor M (1997) The two-parameter Poisson–Dirichlet distribution derived from a stable subordinator. Ann Probab 25:855–900MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. R Core Team (2016) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. https://www.R-project.org/
  31. Ritter C, Tanner MA (1992) Facilitating the Gibbs sampler. The Gibbs stopper and the Griddy-Gibbs sampler. J Am Stat Assoc 87:861–868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rodríguez CE, Walker SG (2014) Univariate Bayesian nonparametric mixture modeling with unimodal kernels. Stat Comput 24:35–49MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. Tierney L (1994) Markov chains for exploring posterior distributions. Ann Stat 22:1701–1762MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. Wade S, Ghahramani Z (2017) Bayesian cluster analysis: point estimation and credible balls. Bayesian Anal.  https://doi.org/10.1214/17-BA1073

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of StatisticsUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
  2. 2.Department of StatisticsITAMMexico CityMexico
  3. 3.Department of Statistical SciencesUniversity of PaduaPaduaItaly

Personalised recommendations