On the use of external information in social network analysis

Regular Article
First Online:
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:

Abstract

Network analysis focuses on links among interacting units (actors). Interactions are often derived from the presence of actors at events or activities (two-mode network) and this information is coded and arranged in a typical affiliation matrix. In addition to the relational data, interest may focus on external information gathered on both actors and events. Our aim is to explore the effect of external information on the formation of ties by setting a strategy able to decompose the original affiliation matrix by linear combinations of data vectors representing external information with a suitable matrix of coefficients. This allows to obtain peculiar relational data matrices that include the effect of external information. The derived adjacency matrices can then be analyzed from the network analysis perspective. In particular, we look for groups of structurally equivalent actors obtained through clustering methods. Illustrative examples and a real dataset in the framework of scientific collaboration will give a major insight into the proposed strategy.

Keywords

Attribute data Clustering Positional analysis Scientific collaboration network Two-mode network 

Mathematics Subject Classification (2000)

62H17 62J05 91C20 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aluja Banet T, Lebart L (1985) Factorial analysis upon a graph. Bull Tech Centre Statist Inform Appl 3: 4–34Google Scholar
  2. Benali H, Escofier B (1990) Analyse factorielle lissée et analyse factorielle des diffèrences locales. Rev Statist Appl 38: 55–76Google Scholar
  3. Burt RS (1976) Positions in networks. Social Forces 55: 93–122MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Butts CT (2010) Software Manual for the R sna Package. R package version 2.1Google Scholar
  5. Davis A, Burleigh B, Gardner M, Gardner R (1941) Deep south: a social anthropological study of caste and class. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  6. De Stefano D, Vitale MP (2009) Exploring the pattern of scientific collaboration networks. In: Ingrassia S, Rocci R (eds) Book of short papers classification and data analysis. CLEUP, Padova, pp 161–164Google Scholar
  7. Ferligoj A, Batagelj V (1982) Clustering with relational constraint. Psychometrika 47: 413–426MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Giordano G, Vitale MP (2007) Factorial contiguity maps to explore relational data patterns. Statist Appl 19: 297–306Google Scholar
  9. Glanzel W, Schubert A (2005) Analyzing scientific networks through co-authorship. In: Moed H, Glanzel W, Schmoch U (eds) Handbook of quantitative science and technology research. Springer, Netherlands, pp 257–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Katz JS, Martin BR (1997) What is research collaboration?. Res Policy 26: 1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lazarsfeld P, Merton RK (1954) Friendship as a social process: a substantive and methodological analysis. In: Berger M, Abel T, Page CH (eds) Freedom and control in modern society. Van Nostrand, New York, pp 18–66Google Scholar
  12. Lebart L (1969) Analyse statistique de la contiguité. Annales de l’ISUP: publications de l’Institut de statistique de l’Université de Paris. ISUP, Paris pp 81–112Google Scholar
  13. Lorrain F, White HC (1971) Structural equivalence of individuals in social networks. J Math Sociol 1: 49–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook J (2001) Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Ann Rev Sociol 27: 415–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Melin G, Persson O (1996) Studying research collaboration using co-authorships. Scientometrics 36: 363–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Robins GL, Pattison P, Kalish Y, Lusher D (2007) An introduction to exponential random graph (p*) models for social networks. Social Netw 29: 173–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rogers EM (2003) Diffusion of innovations, 5th edn. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Searle SR (1997) Linear models. Wiley, NewYorkMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. Suits DB (1957) Use of dummy variables in regression equations. JASA 52(280): 548–551MATHGoogle Scholar
  20. Wasserman S, Faust K (1994) Social network analysis: methods and applications. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  21. White H, Boorman S, Breiger R (1976) Social structure from multiple networks: I. Blockmodels of roles and positions. Am J Sociol 81: 730–780CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of SalernoFisciano (SA)Italy

Personalised recommendations