A Position and Torque Switching Control Method for Robot Collision Safety
With the increasing number of human-robot interaction applications, robot control characteristics and their effects on safety as well as performance should be taken account into the robot control system. In this paper, a position and torque switching control method was proposed to improve the robot safety and performance, when robots and humans work in the same space. The switching control method includes two modes, the position control mode using a proportion-integral (PI) algorithm, and the torque control mode using sliding mode control (SMC) algorithm for eliminating swing. Under the normal condition, the robot works in position control mode for trajectory tracking with quick response. Once the robot and human collide, the robot will switch to torque control mode immediately, and the impact force will be restricted within a safe range. When the robot and human detach, the robot will resume to position control mode automatically. Moreover, for a better performance, the joint torque is detected from direct-current (DC) motor’s current rather than the torque sensor. The experiment results show that the proposed approach is effective and feasible.
KeywordsHuman-robot interaction position control torque control switching control robot collision safety
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
We would like to thank the reviewers for their careful review and constructive suggestions and the work of editors. Thanks also for the help of the team members.
- S. Haddadin, A. Albu-Schaffer, O. Eiberger, G. Hirzinger. New insights concerning intrinsic joint elasticity for safety. In Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and System, IEEE, Taipei, Taiwan, China, pp. 2181–2187, 2010.Google Scholar
- M. Beetz, G. Bartels, A. Albu-Schaffer. Robotic agents capable of natural and safe physical interaction with human co-workers. In Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, IEEE, Hamburg, Germany, pp. 6528–6535, 2015.Google Scholar
- A. De Luca, A. Albu-Schaffer, S. Haddadin, G Hirzinger. Collision detection and safe reaction with the DLR-III lightweight manipulator arm. In Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, IEEE, Beijing, China, pp. 1623–1630, 2006.Google Scholar
- D. Gandhi, E. Cervera. Sensor covering of a robot arm for collision avoidance. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, IEEE, Taipei, Taiwan, China, vol. 5, pp. 4951–4955, 2003.Google Scholar
- T. L. Lam, H. W. Yip, H. H. Qian, Y. S. Xu. Collision avoidance of industrial robot arms using an invisible sensitive skin. In Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, IEEE, Vilamoura, Algarve, Portugal, pp. 4542–4543, 2012.Google Scholar
- D. Kulic, E. Croft. Real-time safety for human-robot interaction. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Advanced Robotics, IEEE, Seattle, USA, pp. 719–724, 2005.Google Scholar
- S. D. Lee, J. B. Song. Guideline for determination of link mass of a robot arm for collision safety. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Ubiquitous robots and Ambient Intelligence, IEEE, Incheon, Korea, pp. 383–385, 2011.Google Scholar
- H. O. Lim, M. Sunagawa, N. Takeuchi. Development of human-friendly robot with collision force suppression mechanism. In Proceedings of ICROS-SICE, IEEE, Fukuoka, Japan, pp. 5712–5716, 2009.Google Scholar
- A. De Luca, L. Ferrajoli. Exploiting robot redundancy in collision detection and reaction. In Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, IEEE, Nice, France, pp. 3299–3305, 2008.Google Scholar
- S. Haddadin, A. Albu-Schaffer, A. De Luca, G. Hirzinger. Collision detection & reaction: A contribution to safe physical Human-Robot Interaction. In Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, IEEE, Nice, France, pp. 3352–3363, 2008.Google Scholar
- Y. Karayiannidis, L. Droukas, D. Papageorgiou, Z. Doulgeri. Robot control for task performance and enhanced safety under impact. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, vol. 2, Article number 34, 2015.Google Scholar
- H. B. Wu, H. Q. Zheng, J. M. Yang, F. Li. Robot arm safety improvement by position/torque switching control. In Proceedings of International Conference on Applied In formatics and Communication, Xi’an, China, pp. 131–139, 2011.Google Scholar
- M. Farooq, D. B. Wang. Hybrid force/position control scheme for flexible joint robot with friction between and the end-effector and the environment. International Journal of Engineering Science, vol. 46, no. 12, pp. 1266–1278, 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijengsci.2008.06.010.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- J. Srisertpol, C. Khajorntraidet. Estimation of DC motor variable torque using adaptive compensation. In Proceedings of Chinese Control and Decision Conference, IEEE, Guilin, China, pp. 712–717, 2009.Google Scholar