Purcell’s swimmer revisited

Article
First Online:
Received:
Revised:

Abstract

Purcell’s swimmer was proposed by E. M. Purcell to explain bacterial swimming motions. It has been proved experimentally that a swimmer of this kind is possible under inertial-less and high viscous environment. But we could not investigate all the aspects of this mechanism through experiments due to practical difficulties. The computational fluid dynamics (CFD) provides complementary methods to experimental fluid dynamics. In particular, these methods offer the means of testing theoretical advances for conditions unavailable experimentally. Using such methodology, we have investigated the fluid dynamics of force production associated with the Purcell’s swimmer. By employing dynamic mesh and user-defined functions, we have computed the transient flow around the swimmer for various stroke angles. Our simulations capture the bidirectional swimming property successfully and are in agreement with existing theoretical and experimental results. To our knowledge, this is the first CFD study which shows the fact that swimming direction depends on stroke angle. We also prove that for small flapping frequencies, swimming direction can also be altered by changing frequency-showing breakdown of Stokes law with inertia.

Keywords

Very low Reynolds number flow swimming motion of bacteria dynamic mesh Purcell’s swimmer Stokes flow 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    S. Childress. Mechanics of Swimming and Flying, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    E. M. Purcell. Life at low Reynolds number. American Journal of Physics, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 3–11, 1977.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    R. Gilad, A. Porat, S. Trachtenberg. Motility modes of Spiroplasma melliferum BC3: A helical, wall-less bacterium driven by linear motor. Molecular Microbiology, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 657–669, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    L. Becker, S. A. Koehler, H. A. Stone. Purcell’s swimmer: Which way does it go? In Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Division of Fluid Dynamics, Washington, USA, 2000.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    L. E. Becker, S. A. Koehler, H. A. Stone. On self-propulsion of micro-machines at low Reynolds number: Purcell’s three-link swimmer. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 490, pp. 15–35, 2003.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    A. Naja, R. Golestanian. Simple swimmer at low Reynolds number: Three linked spheres. Physical Review E, vol. 69, no. 6, 062901, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    J. E. Avron, O. Raz. A geometric theory of swimming: Purcell’s swimmer and its symmetrized cousin. New Journal of Physics, vol. 10, 063016, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    M. S. Kumar, P. Philominathan. The physics of flagellar motion of E. coli during chemotaxis. Biophysical Reviews, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 13–20, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    J. Gray, G. Hancock. The propulsion of sea-urchin spermatozoa. Journal of Experimental Biology, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 802–814, 1955.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    J. Keller, S. Rubinow. Slender-body theory for slow viscous flow. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 75, no. 4, pp. 705–714, 1976.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    M. Bzdega, B. D. Robertson, R. Soller, G. Huber, S. A. Koehler. Motion of a robotic Purcell-type swimmer in a granular medium, to be published.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    C. Brian. Bio-inspired Fluid Locomotion, Ph.D. dissertation, Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA, 2009.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    M. Kim, J. C. Bird, A. J. V. Parys, K. S. Breuer, T. R. Powers. A macroscopic scale model of bacterial flagellar bundling. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 100, no. 26, pp. 15481–15485, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    ANSYS® Fluent, Flows using sliding and dynamic meshes, Help System, ANSYS, Inc., 2010.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    X. F. Ye, B. F. Gao, S. X. Guo, L. Q. Wang. Development of ICPF actuated underwater microrobots. International Journal of Automation and Computing, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 382–391, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    W. Zhang, S. X. Guo, K. Asaka. A new type of hybrid fishlike microrobot. International Journal of Automation and Computing, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 358–365, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty, Oman Dental CollegeMuscatSultanate of Oman
  2. 2.Research and PG Department of PhysicsAVVM Sri Pushpam CollegePoondiIndia

Personalised recommendations