Design of poiseuille flow controllers using the method of inequalities

  • John McKernan
  • James F. Whidborne
  • George Papadakis
Article
  • 36 Downloads

Abstract

This paper investigates the use of the method of inequalities (MoI) to design output-feedback compensators for the problem of the control of instabilities in a laminar plane Poiseuille flow. In common with many flows, the dynamics of streamwise vortices in plane Poiseuille flow are very non-normal. Consequently, small perturbations grow rapidly with a large transient that may trigger nonlinearities and lead to turbulence even though such perturbations would, in a linear flow model, eventually decay. Such a system can be described as a conditionally linear system. The sensitivity is measured using the maximum transient energy growth, which is widely used in the fluid dynamics community. The paper considers two approaches. In the first approach, the MoI is used to design low-order proportional and proportional-integral (PI) controllers. In the second one, the MoI is combined with McFarlane and Glover’s H loop-shaping design procedure in a mixed-optimization approach.

Keywords

Transient energy growth transient behaviour flow control Poiseuille flow method of inequalities (MoI) mixed optimization H-optimization 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    S. Scott Collis, R. D. Joslin, A. Seifert, V. Theofilis. Issues in Active Flow Control: Theory, Control, Simulation, and Experiment. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, vol. 40, no. 4–5, pp. 237–289, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    J. S. Baggett, T. A. Driscoll, L. N. Trefethen. A Mostly Linear Model of Transition to Turbulence. Physics of Fluids, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 833–838, 1995.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    D. R. Carlson, S. E. Widnall, M. F. Peeters. A Flowvisualization Study of Transition in Plane Poiseuille Flow. Journal of Fluid Mechanics Digital Archive, vol. 121, pp. 487–505, 1982.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    S. A. Orszag. Accurate Solution of the Orr-Sommerfeld Stability Equation. Journal of Fluid Mechanics Digital Archive, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 689–703, 1971.MATHGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    V. Zakian. New Formulation for the Method of Inequalities. Proceedings of Institution of Electrical Engineers, vol. 126, no. 6, pp. 579–584, 1979. (Reprinted in Systems and Control Encyclopedia, vol. 5, pp. 3206–3215, 1987.)Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    P. J. Schmid, D. S. Henningson. Stability and Transition in Shear Flows. Applied Mathematical Sciences, vol. 142, 2001.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    T. R. Bewley, S. Liu. Optimal and Robust Control and Estimation of Linear Paths to Transition. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 365, pp. 305–349, 1998.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    J. McKernan, J. F. Whidborne, G. Papadakis. Linear Quadratic Control of Plane Poiseuille Flow — The Transient Behaviour. International Journal of Control, vol. 80, no. 12, pp. 1912–1930, 2007.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    J. F. Whidborne, J. McKernan, G. Papadakis. Minimising Transient Energy Growth in Plane Poiseuille Flow. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers — Part I: Journal of Systems and Control Engineering, vol. 222, no. 5, pp. 323–331, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    J. F. Whidborne, J. McKernan. On the Minimization of Maximum Transient Energy Growth. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 52, no. 9, pp. 1762–1767, 2007.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    V. Zakian, U. Al-Naib. Design of Dynamical and Control Systems by the Method of Inequalities. Proceedings of Institution of Electrical Engineers, vol. 120, no. 11, pp. 1421–1427, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    D. C. McFarlane, K. Glover. Robust Controller Design Using Normalized Coprime Factor Plant Descriptions. Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, vol. 138, 1990.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    J. F. Whidborne, I. Postlethwaite, D. W. Gu. Robust Controller Design Using H Loop-shaping and the Method of Inequalities. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 455–461, 1994.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    J. F. Whidborne, J. McKernan, G. Papadakis. Poiseuille Flow Controller Design via the Method of Inequalities. In Proceedings of UKACC International Conference on Control, Manchester, UK, CDROM, paper number 150, 2008.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    J. McKernan, G. Papadakis, J. F. Whidborne. A Linear State-space Representation of Plane Poiseuille Flow for Control Design — A Tutorial. International Journal of Modelling, Identification and Control, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 272–280, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    J. McKernan. Control of Plane Poiseuille Flow: A Theoretical and Computational Investigation, Ph. D. dissertation, Cranfield University, UK, 2006.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    J. McKernan, G. Papadakis, J. F. Whidborne. Linear and Non-linear Simulations of Feedback Control in Plane Poiseuille Flow. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 2008. (in press, DOI: 10.1002/fld.1851)Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    M. E. Ahmed, P. R. Belanger. Scaling and Roundoff in Fixed-point Implementation of Control Algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 228–234, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    J. F. Whidborne, D. W. Gu, I. Postlethwaite. Algorithms for the Method of Inequalities — A Comparative Study. In Proceedings of American Control Conference, IEEE Press, Seattle, WA, USA, vol. 5, pp. 3393–3397, 1995.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    C. M. Fonseca, P. J. Fleming. Multiobjective Optimization and Multiple Constraint Handling with Evolutionary Algorithms — Part I: A Unified Formulation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics — Part A, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 26–37, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    V. Zakian. Control Systems Design — A New Framework, Springer-Verlag, London, UK, 2005.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    G. P. Liu, J. B. Yang, J. F. Whidborne. Multiobjective Optimisation and Control, Research Studies Press, Baldock, UK, 2001.Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    J. F. Whidborne, G. Murad, D. W. Gu, I. Postlethwaite. Robust Control of an Unknown Plant — The IFAC 93 benchmark. International Journal of Control, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 589–640, 1995.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    I. Postlethwaite, J. F. Whidborne, G. Murad, D. W. Gu. Robust Control of the Benchmark Problem Using H Methods and Numerical Optimization Techniques. Automatica, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 615–619, 1994.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    S. S. Joshi, J. L. Speyer, J. Kim. A Systems Theory Approach to the Feedback Stabilization of Infinitesimal and Finite-amplitude Disturbances in Plane Poiseuille Flow. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 332, pp. 157–184, 1997.MATHGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    L. Baramov, O. R. Tutty, E. Rogers. H Control of Nonperiodic Two-dimensional Channel Flow. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 111–122, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Springer-Verlag GmbH 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • John McKernan
    • 1
  • James F. Whidborne
    • 2
  • George Papadakis
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringKing’s College London, StrandLondonUK
  2. 2.Department of Aerospace SciencesCranfield UniversityBedfordshireUK

Personalised recommendations