Monitoring grinding wheel redress-life using support vector machines

  • Xun ChenEmail author
  • Thitikorn Limchimchol


Condition monitoring is a very important aspect in automated manufacturing processes. Any malfunction of a machining process will deteriorate production quality and efficiency. This paper presents an application of support vector machines in grinding process monitoring. The paper starts with an overview of grinding behaviour. Grinding force is analysed through a Short Time Fourier Transform (STFT) to identify features for condition monitoring. The Support Vector Machine (SVM) methodology is introduced as a powerful tool for the classification of different wheel wear situations. After training with available signal data, the SVM is able to identify the state of a grinding process. The requirement and strategy for using SVM for grinding process monitoring is discussed, while the result of the example illustrates how effective SVMs can be in determining wheel redress-life.


Monitoring grinding support vector machine 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    H. Y. Kim, S. R. Kim, J. H. Ahn, S. H. Kim. Process monitoring of centerless grinding using acoustic emission. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, vol. 111, no. 1–3, pp. 273–278, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Janez Gradisek, Andreas Baus, Edvard Govekar, Fritz Klocke, Igor Grabec. Automatic chatter detection in grinding. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, vol. 43, no. 14, pp. 1397–1403, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Pawel Lezanski. An intelligent system for grinding wheel condition monitoring. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, vol. 109, no. 3, pp. 258–263, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    X. Chen, W. B. Rowe, Y. Li, B. Mills. Grinding Vibration Detection Using a Neural Network. the Journal of Engineering Manufacture, Proceedings of IMechE Part B, vol. 210, B4, 349–352, 1996.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    B. Samanta. Gear fault detection using artificial neural networks and support vector machines with generic algorithms. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 625–644, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Lijuan Cao. Support Vector Machines experts for time series forecasting. Neurocomputing, vol. 51, pp. 321–339, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    M. A. Mohandes, T. O. Halawani, S. Rehman, Ahmed A. Hussain. Support vector machines for wind speed prediction. Renewable Energy, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 939–947, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Cosimo Distante, Nicola Ancona, Pietro Siciliano. Support vector machines for olfactory signals recognition. Sensors and Actuators, vol. B, no. 88, pp. 30–39, 2003.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Yingjie Wang, Chin-Seng Chua, Yeong-Khing Ho. Facial feature detection and face recognition from 2D and 3D images. Pattern Recognition Letters, vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 1191–1202, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Steve R. Gunn. Support Vector Machines for Classification and Regression. Technical Report, School of Electronics and Computer Science, Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science and Department of Electronics and Computer Science, 1998.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    J. A. K. Suykens, T. V. Gestel, J. D. Brabanter, B. D. Moor, J. Vandewalle. Least squares support vector machines, World Sciencetific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd, Singapore, 2002.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    M. Kemal Kiymik, Inan Guler, Alper Dizibuyuk, Mehmet Akin. Comparison of STFT and wavelet transform methods in determining epileptic seizure activity in EEG signals for real-time application. Computers in Biology and Medicine, vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 603–616, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    S. Qian, D. Chen. Joint time-frequency analysis: methods and applications, Prentice Hall Inc, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1996.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Vladimir N. Vapnik. The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory, Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., New York, USA. 1995.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    K. Pelckman, J. A. K. Suykens, T. V. Gestel, J. D Brabanter, L. Lukas, B. Hamers, B. D. Moor, J. Vandewalle. A Matlab/c toolbox for least square support vector machines. ESAT-SCD-SISTA Technical Report 02-145. 2002.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Mechanical, Materials and Manufacturing EngineeringUniversity of NottinghamNottinghamUK

Personalised recommendations