Advertisement

Forestry Studies in China

, Volume 14, Issue 4, pp 299–306 | Cite as

Improving cross drain systems to minimize sediment delivery using GIS

  • Ehsan Abdi
  • Saeed Rahbari SisakhtEmail author
  • Mostafa Moghadami Rad
Research Article

Abstract

A well developed network of roads must exist as a necessary infrastructure system in modern forestry to facilitate forest operations. But forest roads have the potential to disrupt the drainage characteristics of watersheds and lead to negative impacts on the environment with increased erosion and sediment yields. Numerous factors affect surface erosion of roads and sediment production potential; determining and ranking them could be a guide for management decisions to erosion control. In this study, the CULSED model (as an extension of ArcGIS) was used to estimate sediment delivery and the distribution of a road network, given the existing culverts. Using the model, some culverts were added to the road network around places with high sediment delivery in order to minimize it. After a correlation analysis and adjustment between sediment production and the factors, i.e., road width, road gradient, age of road and vegetation cover, the trend of changes in sediment delivery with model changes in the input was investigated with a sensitivity analysis of the model. The results show that adding new culverts to the road resulted in a significant reduction of sediment delivery. The most important factor affecting sediment delivery was road width, followed by road gradient, vegetation cover and age of road. Road width and gradient were positively correlated with sediment delivery, while vegetation cover and age of road were negatively correlated. The best model to show the relation between sediment delivery and road width as well as with road gradient was a linear model, for vegetation cover a cubic equation and for road age a power model. The results of sensitivity analysis showed that sediment delivery had the greatest sensitivity to changes of road width and was least sensitive to changes in the age of the road. This model can help to estimate sediment delivery with its spatial distribution, which can be used for optimization of cross drain systems and strategies of sediment control. Application of the model requires field trials to acquire the necessary input data. The reliability of our results is a function of the accuracy of inputs, especially digital elevation model.

Key words

forest road cross drain culvert sediment delivery sensitivity analysis CULSED 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abdi E, Majnounian B, Genet M, Rahimi H. 2010. Quantifying the effects of root reinforcement of Persian Ironwood (Parrotia persica) on slope stability; a case study: Hillslope of Hyrcanian forests, northern Iran. Ecol Eng, 36: 1409–1416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akay A E, Erdas E M, Reis M, Yuksel A. 2008. Estimating sediment yield from a forest road network by using a sediment prediction model and GIS techniques. Build Environ, 43: 687–695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson B, Potts D F. 1987. Suspended sediment and turbidity following road construction and logging in western Montana. J Am Water Resour Assoc, 23(4): 681–690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson D M, MacDonald L H. 1998. Modelling road surface sediment production using a vector geographic information system. Earth Surf Process Landforms, 23(2): 95–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. André J E, Anderson H W. 1961. Variation of soil erodibility with geology, geographic zone, elevation, and vegetation type in northern California wildlands. J Geophys Res, 66(10): 3351–3358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Arnáez J, Larrea V, Ortigosa L. 2004. Surface runoff and soil erosion on unpaved forest roads from rainfall simulation tests in northeastern Spain. Catena, 57: 1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bilby R E, Sullivan K, Duncan S H. 1989. The generation and fate of road-surface sediment in forested watersheds in southwestern Washington. Forest Sci, 35(2): 453–468Google Scholar
  8. Brown G W, Krygier J T. 1971. Clear-cut logging and sediment production in the Oregon Coast Range. Water Resour Res, 7(5): 1189–1198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burroughs E R, King J G. 1989. Reduction of soil erosion on forest roads. General Technical Report INT-264. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station. Ogden, UtahGoogle Scholar
  10. Burroughs E R, Luce C H, Phillips F. 1992. Estimating interrill erodibility of forest soils. Trans ASAE, 35(5): 1489–1495Google Scholar
  11. Cochrane T A, Egli M, Phillips C, Acharya G. 2007. Development of a forest road erosion calculation GIS tool for forest road planning and design. International Congress on Modelling and Simulation: Land, Water, & Environmental Management: Integrating Systems for Sustainability. Christchurch, New Zealand, 1273–1279Google Scholar
  12. Coker R J, Fahey B D, Payne J J. 1993. Fine sediment production from truck traffic, Queen Charlotte Forest, Marlborough Sounds, New Zealand. J Hydrol (NZ), 31(1): 56–64Google Scholar
  13. Croke J, Hairsine P, Fogarty P. 1999. Sediment transport, redistribution and storage on logged forest hillslopes in southeastern Australia. Hydrol Process, 13(17): 2705–2720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Damian F. 2001. Improving cross drain culvert spacing with GIS interactive design tool. The International Mountain Logging and 11th Pacific Northwest Skyline Symposium. Seattle, USA, 201–206Google Scholar
  15. Damian F. 2003. Cross-drain placement to reduce sediment delivery from forest roads to streams. Dissertation for the Master Degree. Seattle: University of Washington, 207Google Scholar
  16. Dubé K, McCalmon M. 2004. Technical documentation for SEDMODL, Version 2.0 road erosion/delivery model. Research Triangle Park, NC, National Council for Air and Stream Improvement, Inc. http://www.ncasi.org/support/downloads. Access 25 September 2010
  17. Dubé K, Megahan W F, McCalmon M. 2004. Washington road surface erosion model. State of Washington Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, Washington, D.C., USAGoogle Scholar
  18. Elliot W J, Hall D E, Graves S R, Scheele D L. 1999a. The XDRAIN Cross Drain Spacing and Sediment Yield Program Version 2.00. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, San Dimas Technology and Development Center. Washington, D.C., USAGoogle Scholar
  19. Elliot W J, Hall D E, Scheele D L. 1999b. WEPP interface for predicting forest road runoff, erosion and sediment delivery. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, San Dimas Technology and Development Center. Washington, D.C., USAGoogle Scholar
  20. Environmental Assessment Division. 2003. Road-related erosion issues on Bureau of Land Management-Administered Lands in Northwestern New Mexico. Argonne National Laboratory. Argonne, Illinois, 33Google Scholar
  21. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). 1998. A manual for the planning, design and construction of forest roads in steep terrain. FAO. Roma, Italy, 149Google Scholar
  22. Farrish K W, Adams J C, Thompson C V. 1993. Soil conservation practices on clearcut forestlands in Louisiana. J Soil Water Conserv, 48(2): 136–139Google Scholar
  23. Foltz R B, Copeland N S, Elliot W J. 2009. Reopening abandoned forest roads in northern Idaho, USA: Quantification of runoff, sediment concentration, infiltration, and interrill erosion parameters. J Environ Manage, 90: 2542–2550PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Foltz R B, Truebe M. 2003. Locally available aggregate and sediment production. Transportation Research Record 1819, Paper No. LVR8-1050. The 8th International Conference on Low-volume Roads. Reno, USAGoogle Scholar
  25. Forest Management Plan. 2000. Forest Management Plan. Department of Forestry, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran. Nowshahr, IranGoogle Scholar
  26. Forsyth A R, Bubb K A, Cox M E. 2006. Runoff, sediment loss and water quality from forest roads in a southeast Queensland coastal plain Pinus plantation. Forest Ecol Manage, 221: 194–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fransen P J B, Phillips C J, Fahey B D. 2001. Forest road erosion in New Zealand: Overview. Earth Surf Process Landforms, 26: 165–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fu B H, Newham L T H, Ramos-Scharrón C E. 2010. A review of surface erosion and sediment delivery models for unsealed roads. Environ Model Softw, 25: 1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Furniss M J, Roelofs T D, Yee C S. 1991. Road construction and maintenance. In: Meehan W R, ed. Influences of Forest and Rangeland Management on Salmonid Fishes and Their Habitats. Special Publication 19. Bethesda, MD: American Fisheries Society, 297–323Google Scholar
  30. Gray D H, Megahan W F. 1981. Forest vegetation removal and slope stability in the Idaho Batholith. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. General Technical Report INT-271. Ogden, Utah, 23Google Scholar
  31. Grayson R B, Haydon S R, Jayasuriya M D A, Finlayson B L. 1993. Water quality in mountain ash forests—separating the impacts of roads from those of logging operations. J Hydrol, 150: 459–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hartsog W S, Gonsior M J. 1973. Analysis of construction and initial performance of the China Glenn Road, Warren District, Payette National Forest. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. General Technical Report INT-5. Ogden, UT, 22Google Scholar
  33. Haupt H F. 1959. Road and slope characteristics affecting sediment movement from logging roads. J Forest, 57(5): 329–332Google Scholar
  34. Heede B H. 1984. Overland flow and sediment delivery: An experiment with small subdrainage in southwestern ponderosa pine forests (Colorado, U.S.A.). J Hydrol, 72: 261–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. IPBO (Iranian Plan and Budget Organization). 2000. Guidelines for design, execute and using forest roads No. 131. 2rd edn. Office of the Deputy for Technical Affairs. Bureau of Technical affairs and standards, Iran, 170Google Scholar
  36. Jha S, Western A, May D, Turner J, Gardiner G. 2006. A Monte Carlo analysis of sediment load from unsealed forest road crossings. International Congress on Modeling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand. Melbourne, Australia, 2390–2395Google Scholar
  37. Jordán-López A, Martínez-Zavala L, Bellinfante N. 2008. Impact of different parts of unpaved forest roads on runoff and sediment yield in a Meditrranean area. Sci Total Environ, 407: 937–944PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ketcheson G L, Megahan W F, King J G. 1999. “R1-R4” and “BOISED” sediment prediction model tests using forest roads in granitics. J Am Water Resour Assoc, 35(1): 83–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. King J G, Gonsior M J. 1980. Effects of forest roads on stream sediment. Symposium on Watershed Management. American Society of Civil Engineering. Boise, USA, 19Google Scholar
  40. Kochenderfer J N, Helvey J D. 1987. Using gravel to reduce soil losses from minimum-standard forest roads. J Soil Water Conserv, 42: 46–50Google Scholar
  41. Lane P N J, Sheridan G J. 2008. Impact of an unsealed forest road stream crossing: water quality and sediment sources. Hydrol Process, 16: 2599–2612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Luce C H, Black T A. 1999. Sediment production from forest roads in western Oregon. Water Resour Res, 35(8): 2561–2570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Luce C H, Wemple B C. 2001. Introduction to special issue on hydrologic and geomorphic effects of forest roads. Earth Surf Process Landforms, 26(2): 111–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. MacDonald L H, Anderson D M, Dietrich W E. 1997. Paradise threatened: Land use and erosion on St. John, US Virgin Islands. Environ Manage, 21(6): 851–863Google Scholar
  45. MacDonald L H, Sampson R L, Anderson D M. 2001. Runoff and road erosion at the plot and road segment scales, St John, US Virgin Islands. Earth Surf Process Landforms, 26: 251–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Madej M A, Eschenbach E A, Diaz C, Teasley R, Baker K. 2006. Optimization strategies for sediment reduction practices on roads in steep, forested terrain. Earth Surf Process Landforms, 31: 1643–1656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Megahan W F. 1974a. Deep-rooted plants for erosion control on granitic roadfills in the Idaho Batholith. Research Papper INT-161. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. Ogden, UtahGoogle Scholar
  48. Megahan W F. 1974b. Erosion over time: A model. Research Paper INT-156. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station. Ogden, UtahGoogle Scholar
  49. Megahan W F, Ketcheson G L. 1996. Predicting downslope travel of granitic sediments from forest roads in Idaho. J Am Water Resour Assoc, 32(2): 371–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Megahan W F, Kidd W J. 1972. Effect of logging roads on sediment production rates in the Idaho Batholith. Research paper INT-123. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. Ogden, Utah, 14Google Scholar
  51. Megahan W F, King P N. 1985. Identification of critical areas on forest lands for control of nonpoint sources of pollution. Environ Manage, 9(1): 7–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Megahan W F, Wilson M, Monsen S B. 2001. Sediment production from granitic cutslopes on forest roads in Idaho, USA. Earth Surf Process Landforms, 26: 153–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Motha J A, Wallbrink P J, Hairsine P B, Grayson R B. 2004. Unsealed roads as suspended sediment sources in an agricultural catchment in south-eastern Australia. J Hydrol, 286: 1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. National Council for Air and Stream Improvement (NCASI). 2002. Technical documentation for SEDMODL version 2.0 road erosion/delivery model. NCASI Oregon Department of Forestry. 2000. Forest road manual report. Oregon, USAGoogle Scholar
  55. Packer P E. 1967. Criteria for designing and locating logging roads to control sediment. Forest Sci, 13(1): 2–18Google Scholar
  56. Prasad A. 2007. A tool to analyze environmental impacts of roads on forest watersheds. Dissertation for the Master Degree. Logan: Utah State University, 214Google Scholar
  57. Ramos-Scharrón C E, MacDonald L H. 2007. Measurement and prediction of natural and anthropogenic sediment sources, St. John, U.S. Virgin Islands. Catena, 71: 250–266Google Scholar
  58. Reid L M, Dunne T. 1984. Sediment production from forest road surfaces. Water Resour Res, 20: 1753–1761CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Santa Cruz County Resource Conservation District. 2004. Private roads maintenance guide for Santa Cruz county. 2nd edn. California, USA, 36Google Scholar
  60. Schiess P, Krogstad F, Damian F. 2004. Locating ditch relief culverts to reduce sediment delivery to streams — an interactive design tool. Joint Conference of IUFRO 3.06 Forest Operations under Mountainous Conditions and the 12th International Mountain Logging Conference. Vancouver BC, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  61. Sugden B D, Woods S W. 2007. Sediment production from forest roads in western Montana. J Am Water Resour Assoc, 43: 193–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Swanson F J, Dryness C T. 1975. Impact of clear-cutting and road construction on soil erosion by landslides in the western Cascade Range, Oregon. Geology, 3: 393–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Swift L W. 1984. Gravel and grass surfacing reduces soil loss from mountain roads. Forest Sci, 30(3): 657–670Google Scholar
  64. Swift L W. 1986. Filter strip widths for forest roads in the southern Appalachians. South J Appl Forest, 10: 27–34Google Scholar
  65. Tennyson L C, King J G, Prud’homme B. 1981. Erosional processes on forest mads and flow duration characteristics of the Horse Creek streams. College of Forestry, Wildlife, and Range Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, IDGoogle Scholar
  66. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Forest Service. 1996. Idaho forestry best management practices: compilation of research on their effectiveness. General Technical Report INT-GTR-339. USDA, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station. Ogden, UtahGoogle Scholar
  67. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Forest Service. 1997. Relief culverts. San Dimas Technology and Development Center. San Dimas, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  68. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Forest Service. 2000. Forest roads: a synthesis of scientific information. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-509. USDA, Forest Service. Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, USAGoogle Scholar
  69. Vincent K R. 1985. Runoff and erosion from a logging road in response to snowmelt and rainfall. Dissertation for the Master Degree. Berkley: University of CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  70. Welsh M J. 2008. Sediment production and delivery from forest roads and off-highway vehicle trails in the upper South Platte River watershed, Colorado. Dissertation for the Master Degree. Fort Collins: Colorado State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  71. Wischmeier W H, Smith D D. 1958. Rainfall energy and its relationship to soil loss. Trans Am Geophys Union, 39: 285–291Google Scholar
  72. Wischmeier W H, Smith D D. 1978. Predicting rainfall erosion losses. A guide to conservation planning. The USDA Agricultural Handbook No. 537. Washington, D.C., USAGoogle Scholar
  73. Woolhiser D A, Smith R E, Goodrich D C. 1990. KINEROS, a kinematic runoff and erosion model: documentation and user manual. USDA Agricultural Research Service, No. 77Google Scholar
  74. Ziegler A D, Sutherland R A, Giambelluca T W. 2001. Interstorm surface preparation and sediment detachment by vehicle traffic on unpaved mountain roads. Earth Surf Process Landforms, 26: 235–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Beijing Forestry University and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ehsan Abdi
    • 1
  • Saeed Rahbari Sisakht
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mostafa Moghadami Rad
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Forestry, Faculty of Natural ResourcesUniversity of TehranKarajIran

Personalised recommendations