Forestry Studies in China

, Volume 12, Issue 4, pp 176–183 | Cite as

Effects of different supplements on tetraploid black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia L.) silage

  • Guo-jun Zhang
  • Wen-jing Mi
  • Yun Li
  • Jin-zhong Jiang
  • Chao Lu
  • Chen Niu
Research Article


Preparation of silage is a common method to preserve green forage. It plays an important role in improving forage utilization, solving the problem of forage provision and meeting the nutritional needs of livestock in winter and spring. The effects of various supplements on tetraploid black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia L.) silage were studied by analyzing its color, odor, texture, pH value, the composition and amount of organic acids, the ammonia-N/total-N ratio, crude protein, neutral detergent fibers and acid detergent fibers. Our results show that the silage quality of wilted tetraploid R. pseudoacacia preserved alone is acceptable, while adding brown sugar and Yishengkang to tetraploid R. pseudoacacia foliage improved its quality. The treatments consisting of the tetraploid R. pseudoacacia mixed with 33% and 50% corn stalk achieved the best silage quality in terms of pH value (p < 0.01), amount of lactic acid (p < 0.01), the ammonia-N/total-N ratio (p < 0.01) and the fermentation quality. These treatments also resulted in a high content of crude protein and lower amounts of acid detergent fibers. The treatment consisting of the tetraploid R. pseudoacacia mixed with 20% corn stalk was also good in the quality of its fermentation.

Key words

tetraploid Robinia pseudoacacia silage technology nutrition corn stalk fermentation 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. AOAC. 1990. Official Methods of Analysis, Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 14th ed. Washington DC: The AssociationGoogle Scholar
  2. Baertsche S R, Yokoyama M T, Hanover J W. 1986. Short rotation, hardwood tree biomass as potential ruminant feedchemical compositon, nylon bag ruminal degradation and ensilement of selected species. J Anim Sci, 63: 2028–2043Google Scholar
  3. Cai Y, Benno Y, Ogawa M, Kumai S. 1999. Effect of applying lactic acid bacteria isolated from forage crops on fermentation characteristics and aerobic deterioration of silage. J Dairy Sci, 82: 520–526CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. DeGomez T, Wagner M R. 2001. Culture and use of black locust. HortTechnology, 11: 279–288Google Scholar
  5. Eigel R A, Wittwer R F, Carpenter S B. 1980. Biomass and nutrient accumulation in young black locust stands established by direct seeding on surface mines in eastern Kentucky. In: Garrett H E, Cox G S, eds. Central Hardwood Forestry Conference III. Columbia: University of Missouri, 337–346Google Scholar
  6. Geyer W A, Naughton G G. 1980. Biomass yield and cost analysis (4th year) of various tree species grown under a short rotation management scheme in eastern Kansas. In: Garrett H E, Cox G S, eds. Central Hardwood Forestry Conference III. Columbia: University of Missouri, 315–329Google Scholar
  7. Huntley J C. 2010. Black locust. Accessed 3 January 2010
  8. Keresztesi B. 2010. The black locust. Accessed 3 January 2010
  9. Kim C S, Lee S K. 1973. Morphological and cytological characteristics of spontaneous tetraploidy Robinia pseudoacacia L. Republic of Korea: The Institute of Forest Genetics (in Korean with English abstract)Google Scholar
  10. Kung L J, Grieve D B, Thomas J W, Huber J T. 1984. Added ammonia or microbial inocula for fermentation and nitrogenous compounds of alfalfa ensiled at various percents of dry matter. J Dairy Sci, 67: 299–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kung L J, Sheperd A C, Smagala A M, Endres K M, Bessett C A, Ranjit N K, Glancey J L. 1998. The effect of preservatives based on propionic acid on the fermentation and aerobic stability of corn silage and a total mixed ration. J Dairy Sci, 81: 1322–1330CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Li Y, Zhang G J, Lu C, Liu S W. 2006. Analysis of fodder nutritive value in the leaves harvested at different growing stages and parts for tetraploid Robinia pseudoacacia. Forest Res, 19: 580–584 (in Chinese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  13. Liu J X. 1996. Standard of quality evaluation on silage. China Feed, 21: 5–7 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  14. Liu X, Han L J, Shinichiro H, Kazuhisa N. 2004. Effects of different supplements on the quality of alfalfa silage. J China Agr Univ, 9(3): 25–30 (in Chinese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  15. Greub L J, Cosgrove D R. 2006. Judging crop quality, part II: score sheets for evaluating haylage and corn silage. NACTA J, 50: 46–51Google Scholar
  16. McDonald P, Whittenbury R. 1973. The ensilage process. In: Butler G W, Baily R E, eds. Chemistry and Biochemistry of Herbage. London: Academic Press, 33–58Google Scholar
  17. Moseley G, Jones E L, Ramanathan V. 1988. The nutritional evaluation of Italian ryegrass cultivars fed as silage to sheep and cattle. Grass Forage Sci, 43: 291–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Muck R E, Dickerson J T. 1988. Storage temperature effects on proteolysis in alfalfa silage. Trans ASAE, 31: 1005–1009Google Scholar
  19. Rook A J, Gill M. 1990. Prediction of the voluntary intake of grass silages by beef cattle. 1. Linear regression analyses. Anim Prod, 50: 425–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Steen R W J, Gordon F J, Dawson L E R, Park R S, Mayne C S, Agnew R E, Kilpatrick D, Porter M G. 1998. Factors affecting the intake of grass silage by cattle and prediction of silage intake. Anim Sci, 66: 115–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Van Soest P J, Robertson J B, Lewis B A. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci, 74: 3583–3597CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Wang S Z, Tian Y T, Luo X F. 1999. Tissue culture of the gigas type and tetraploid clone of black locust. Plant Physiol Commun, 35: 204–205 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  23. Weatherburn M W. 1967. Phenol-hypochlorite reaction for determinations of ammonia. Anal Chem, 39: 971–974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Winters A L, Merry R J, Muller M, Davies D R, Pahlow G, Muller T. 1998. Degradation of fructans by epiphytic and inoculant lactic acid bacteria during ensilage of grass. J Appl Microbiol, 84: 304–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Yang X M. 2003. Alfalfa planting and dairy cattle feeding. J Yellow Cattle Sci, 29(3): 53–58 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  26. Zhang G J, Li Y, Jiang J Z, Lu C. 2007. Nutrition of the powder of tetraploid black locust for fodder leaves and evaluation of its feeding value. Pratacult Sci, 24(1): 26–30 (in Chinese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  27. Zhang G J, Li Y, Jiang J Z, Lu C, Meng B N. 2007. A preliminary study on silage tetraploid of Robinia pseudoacacia. J Southwest Forest Coll, 27(6): 53–56 (in Chinese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  28. Zhang J K, Lu D X. 2003. Discussion of the fibre problem in ruminants’ diet. China Dairy, 7: 21–24 (in Chinese)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Beijing Forestry University and Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Guo-jun Zhang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Wen-jing Mi
    • 3
  • Yun Li
    • 1
  • Jin-zhong Jiang
    • 1
    • 4
  • Chao Lu
    • 1
  • Chen Niu
    • 1
    • 5
  1. 1.National Engineering Laboratory for Tree Breeding, Key Laboratory for Genetics and Breeding in Forest Trees and Ornamental Plants of Ministry of Education, Tree and Ornamental Plant Breeding and Biotechnology Laboratory of State Forestry Administration, College of Biological Sciences and BiotechnologyBeijing Forestry UniversityBeijingP. R. China
  2. 2.College of Horticulture Science and TechnologyHebei Normal University of Science & TechnologyQinhuangdaoP. R. China
  3. 3.Research Institute of Forestry of Shanxi ProvinceTaiyuanP. R. China
  4. 4.Department of ChemistryGuizhou Normal CollegeGuiyangP. R. China
  5. 5.Department of Plant and Soil ScienceTexas Tech UniversityLubbockUSA

Personalised recommendations