Advertisement

Acta Geochimica

, Volume 38, Issue 1, pp 120–130 | Cite as

Synthesis of zinc oxide–montmorillonite composite and its effect on the removal of aqueous lead ions

  • Davidson E. EgiraniEmail author
  • Nanfe R. Poyi
  • Napoleon Wessey
Original Article
  • 42 Downloads

Abstract

Lead adsorption of zinc oxide-coated ACOR montmorillonite was investigated in batches and under reducing conditions at ambient temperature. The presence of zinc oxide coating significantly enhanced the adsorption of Pb2+ ions by ACOR montmorillonite. Characterization of adsorbents involved the use of X-ray diffraction, sodium saturation techniques, coulter laser analysis, scanning electron microscopy, and electron dispersive spectroscopy. Synthesis involved the trimetric process, activation of the ACOR montmorillonite and reacting of the same with zinc nitrate to produce a zinc oxide composite solid at 450 °C. The reaction mechanism indicated less than one proton coefficient, and higher mass transfer rates, when compared with bare montmorillonite. Intraparticle diffusion was higher than the value recorded for the bare montmorillonite. Reactions based on initial Pb2+ concentration indicated that coated montmorillonite gradually became saturated as the concentration was increased. Reactions based on solid concentration demonstrated a complex change in the capacity of adsorption over different Pb2+ concentrations (10–40 mg L−1) and solid concentrations (2–10 g L−1). The specific surface area reduction, particle size increase, mineral aggregation, and concentration gradient effect controlled the complex changes in adsorption.

Keywords

Synthesis Characterization Zinc oxide–montmorillonite composite Adsorption, Pb2+ ions 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors remain grateful to the Niger Delta University for the usual research allowances provided for the running of research projects.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abdullahi MS (2013) Toxic effects of lead in humans: an overview. Glob Adv Res J Environ Sci Toxicol 2(6):157–162Google Scholar
  2. Akpomie KG, Dawodu FA, Adebowale KO (2015) Mechanism on the sorption of heavy metals from binary solution by a low-cost montmorillonite and its desorption potential. Alex Eng J 54:757–767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Al-Farhan BS (2016) Removal of Cd2+ and Pb2+ ions from aqueous solutions using bentonite-modified magnetic nanoparticles. Int J Nano Chem 2:27–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Allahdin O, Mabingui J, Warte M, Boughriet A (2017) Removal of Pb2+ ions from aqueous solutions by fixed-BED column using a modified brick: (micro)structural, electrokinetic and mechanistic aspects. Appl Clay Sci 148:56–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Alves ME, Lavorenti A (2005) Point of zero salt effect: relationship with clay mineralogy of representative soils of Sao Paulo State, Brazil. Pedosphere 15:545–553Google Scholar
  6. Amiri MJ, Arshadi M, Giannakopoulos E, Kalavrouziotis IK (2018) Removal of mercury (II) and lead (II) from aqueous media by using a green adsorbent: kinetics, thermodynamic, and mechanism studies. J Hazard Toxic Radioact Waste 22:04017026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Arancibia-Miranda N, Baltazar SE, García A, Munoz-Lira D D, Sepúlveda P, Rubio MA, Altbir D (2016) Nanoscale zero valent supported by zeolite and montmorillonite: template effect of the removal of lead ion from an aqueous solution. J Hazard Mater 301:371–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Arshadi M, Soleymanzadeh M, Salvacion JWL, Salimi Vahid F (2014) Nanoscale zero-valent iron (NZVI) supported on sineguelas waste for Pb(II) removal from aqueous solution: kinetics, thermodynamic and mechanism. J Colloid Interface Sci 426:241–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blocher C, Dorda J, Mavrov V, Chmiel H, Lazaridis NK, Matis KA (2003) Hybrid flotation—membrane filtration process for the removal of heavy metal ions from wastewater. Water Res 37:4018–4026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bolan NS, Syers JK, Tillman RW (1986) Ionic strength effects on surface charge and adsorption of phosphate and sulphate by soils. Eur J Soil Sci 37:379–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bonnet M-L, Costa D, Protopopoff E, Marcus P (2017) Theoretical study of the Pb adsorption on Ni, Cr, Fe surfaces and on Ni based alloys. Appl Surf Sci 426:788–795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bouabidi ZB, El-Naas MH, Cortes D, McKay G (2018) Steel making dust as a potential adsorbent for the removal of lead (II) from an aqueous solution. Chem Eng J 334:837–844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brunauer S, Emmett PH, Teller E (1938) Adsorption of gases in multimolecular layers. J Am Chem Soc 60:309–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cataldo S, Gianguzza A, Pettignano A, Villaescusa I (2013a) Mercury(II) removal from aqueous solution by sorption onto alginate, pectate and polygalacturonate calcium gel beads: a kinetic and speciation-based equilibrium. React Funct Polym 73:207–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cataldo S, Gianguzza A, Pettignano A, Villaescusa I (2013b) Lead(II) removal from aqueous solution by sorption onto alginate, pectate and polygalacturonate calcium gel beads: a kinetic and speciation based equilibrium study. React Funct Polym 73:207–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chen Y-M, J-b Gao, Yuan Y-Q, Maa J, Yu S (2016) Relationship between heavy metal contents and clay mineral properties in surface sediments: implications for metal pollution assessment. Cont Shelf Res 124:125–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chen G, Shah KJ, Shia L, Chiang P-C (2017) Removal of Cd(II) and Pb(II) ions from aqueous solutions by synthetic mineral adsorbent: performance and mechanisms. Appl Surf Sci 409:296–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chen Y, Ho S-H, Wang D, Z-s Wei, Chang J-S, N-q Ren (2018) Lead removal by a magnetic biochar derived from persulfate-ZVI treated sludge together with one-pot pyrolysis. Biores Technol 247:463–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chiew CSC, Yeoh HK, Pasbakhsh P, Krishnaiah K, Poh PE, Tey BT, Chan ES (2016) Halloysite/alginate nanocomposite beads: kinetics, equilibrium and mechanism for lead adsorption. Appl Clay Sci 119:301–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Contescu C, Jagiello J, Schwarz JA (1993) Heterogeneity of proton binding sites at the oxide/solution interface. Langmuir 9:1754–1760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Crini GG (2005) Recent developments in polysaccharide-based materials used as adsorbents in wastewater treatment. Prog Polym Sci 30:38–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dastoora AP, Larocpue Y (2004) Global circulation of atmospheric lead: a modeling study. Atmos Environ 38:147–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dhal B, Thatoir HN, Das NN, Paudey BD (2013) Chemical and microbial remediation. J Hazard Mater 250–251:272–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dunnette DA, Chynoweth DP, Mancy KH (1985) The source of hydrogen sulfide in anoxic sediment. Water Res I9(7):875–884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dzombak DA, Morel F (1990) Surface complexation modeling: hydrous ferric oxide. Wiley, New York, p 416Google Scholar
  26. Egirani DE, Wessey N (2015a) Effect of clay and goethite mineral systems on lead removal from aqueous solution: paper ii. Int J Multidiscip Acad Res 3:83–92Google Scholar
  27. Egirani DE, Wessey N (2015b) Effect of mineral systems on lead removal from aqueous solution: part I. Asian J Basic Appl Sci 2:61–73Google Scholar
  28. Egirani DE, Latif MT, Poyi NR, Wessey N, Acharjee S (2017a) Synthesis and characterization of kaolinite coated with copper oxide and its effect on the removal of aqueous mercury(ii) ions: part ii. Int Res J Chem Chem Sci 4:043–048Google Scholar
  29. Egirani DE, Latif MT, Poyi NR, Wessey N, Acharjee S (2017b) Synthesis and characterization of kaolinite coated with copper oxide and its effect on the removal of aqueous mercury(ii) ions: part i. Int Res J Chem Chem Sci 4:055–061Google Scholar
  30. Elouear Z, Bouzid J, Boujelben N, Jamoussi M, Feki F, Montiel A (2008) Heavy metal removal from aqueous solutions by activated phosphate rock. J Hazard Mater 156:412–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Eren E (2009) Removal of heavy metal ions by Unye (Turkey) bentonite in iron and magnesium oxide-coated forms. J Hazard Mater 165:63–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Eric B, Selma L, Ronald L (2010) Fishing activity, health characteristics and lead exposure of Amerindian women living alongside the Beni River (Amazonian Bolivia). Int J Hyg Environ Health 213:20–40Google Scholar
  33. Eze SO, Igwe JC, Dipo D (2013) Effect of particle size on adsorption of heavy metals using chemically modified and unmodified fluted pumpkin and broad-leafed pumpkin pods. Int J Biol Chem Sci 7:852–860Google Scholar
  34. Feng Q, Lin Q, Gong F, Sugita F, Shoya M (2004) Adsorption of lead and mercury by rice husk ash. J Colloid Interface Sci 278:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Fu F, Wang Q (2011) Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewaters: a review. J Environ Manag 92:407–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Haydar S, Aziz JA (2009) Coagulation–flocculation studies of tannery wastewater using cationic polymers as a replacement of metal salts. J Hazard Mater 168:1035–1040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. He J, Li Y, Wang C, Zhang K, Lin D, Kong L, Liu J (2017) Rapid adsorption of Pb, Cu and Cd from aqueous solutions by cyclodextrin polymers. Appl Surf Sci 426:29–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hom DP, Alley MM, Bertsch P (1982) Cation exchange capacity measurement. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 13:851–862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hua M, Zhang S, Pan B, Zhang W, Lv L, Zhang Q (2012) Heavy metal removal from water/wastewater by nano-sized metal oxides: a review. J Hazard Mater 211–212:317–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Husein DZ (2013) Adsorption and removal of mercury ions from aqueous solution using raw and chemically modified Egyptian mandarin peel. Desalin Water Treat 51:6761–6769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Janaki RSG, Sreenivas K, Sivasamy R (2014) Hyperspectral analysis of clay minerals. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci 40:443–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Jha MK, Kumar VJ, Singh R (2001) Review of hydrometallurgical recovery of zinc from industrial wastes. Resour Conserv Recycl 33:1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Jiang R, Tian J, Zheng H, Qi J, Sun S, Li X (2015) A novel magnetic adsorbent based on waste litchi peels for removing Pb(II) from aqueous solution. J Environ Manage 155:24–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Karickhoff SW, Bailey GW (1973) Optical absorption spectra of clay minerals. Clays Clay Miner 21:59–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Khodadadi M, Malekpour A, Ansaritabar M (2017) Removal of Pb(II) and Cu (II) from aqueous solutions by NaA zeolite coated magnetic nanoparticles and optimization of method using experimental design. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 248:256–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kuncoro EP, Isnadina DRM, Darmokoesoemo H, Fauziah OR, Kusuma HS (2018) Characterization, kinetic, and isotherm data for adsorption of Pb2+from aqueous solution by adsorbent from mixture of bagasse-bentonite. Data Brief 16:622–629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Liu Q, Li F, Lu H, Li M, Liu J, Zhang S, Sun Q, Xiong L (2018) Enhanced dispersion stability and heavy metal ion adsorption capability of oxidized starch nanoparticles. Food Chem 242:256–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lopez-Mu-noz MJ, Aguado J, Arencibia A, Pascuala R (2011) Lead removal from aqueous solutions of PbCl2 by heterogeneous photo catalysis with TiO2. Appl Catal B 104:220–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lowell S, Shields JE (1991) Powder surface area and porosity. Springer, Netherlands, p 252Google Scholar
  50. Maity J, Ray SK (2018) Chitosan based nano composite adsorbent—Synthesis, characterization and application for adsorption of binary mixtures of Pb(II) and Cd(II) from water. Carbohyd Polym 182:159–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Maruthupandy M, Zuo Y, Chen J-S, Song J-M, Niu H-L, Mao C-J, Zhang S-Y, Shen Y-H (2017) Synthesis of metal oxide nanoparticles (CuO and ZnO NPs) via biological template and their optical sensor applications: the key laboratory of environment friendly. Appl Surf Sci 397:167–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ndabigengesere A, Narasiah KS (2010) Use of Moringa oleifera seeds as a primary coagulant in wastewater treatment. Environ Technol 19:789–800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Nguyen TC, Loganathan P, Nguyen TV, Vigneswaran S, Kandasamy J, Naidu R (2015) Simultaneous adsorption of Cd, Cr, Cu, Pb, and Zn by an iron-coated Australian zeolite in batch and fixed-bed column studies. Chem Eng J 270:393–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Olivaa J, De Pablo J, Cortina J-L, Cama J, Ayora C (2011) Removal of cadmium, copper, nickel, cobalt and lead from water by Apatite IITM: column experiments. J Hazard Mater 194:312–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Phiwdang K, Suphankij S, Mekprasart W, Pecharap W (2013) Synthesis of CuO nanoparticles by precipitation method using different precursors. Energy Proced 34:740–745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pirveysian M, Ghiaci M (2018) Synthesis and characterization of sulfur functionalized 502 grapheme oxide nanosheets as efficient sorbent for removal of Pb2+, Cd2+, Ni2+ and Zn2+ ions from aqueous solution: a combined thermodynamic and kinetic studies. Appl Surf Sci 428:98–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Plescia P, Maccari D (1996) Recovering metals from red mud by thermal treatment and magnetic separation. J Miner Met Mater Soc 48:25–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Qiu H, Lu LV, Bing-cai PAN, Qing-jian Z, Wei-ming Z, Quan-xing Z (2009) Critical review in adsorption kinetic models. J Zhejiang Univ Sci A 10:716–724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Ravichandran M (2004) Interactions between lead and dissolved organic matter—a review. Chemosphere 55:319–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rwiza MJ, Oh S-Y, Kim K-W, Kim SD (2018) Comparative sorption isotherms and removal studies for Pb(II) by physical and thermochemical modification of low-cost agro-wastes from Tanzania. Chemosphere 195:135–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Seema KM, Mamba BB, Njuguna J, Bakhtizin RZ, Mishra AK (2018) Removal of lead (II) from aqueous waste using (CD-PCL-TiO2) bio-nanocomposites. Int J Biol Macromol 109:136–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Shen Z, Zhang Y, McMillan Jin F, Al-Tabbaa O (2017) Qualitative and quantitative characterisation of adsorption mechanisms of lead on four biochars. Sci Total Environ 609:1401–1410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Shen Z, Tian D, Zhang X, Tang L, Su M, Zhang L, Li Z, Hu S, Hou D (2018) Mechanisms of biochar assisted immobilization of Pb2+ by bioapatite in aqueous solution. Chemosphere 190:260–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Shi Z-J, Guo Q, Xu Y-Q, Wu D, Liao S-M, Zhang F-Y, Zhang Z-Z, Jin R-C (2017) Mass transfer characteristics, rheological behavior and fractal dimension of anammox granules: the roles of upflow velocity and temperature. Biores Technol 244:117–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Stephan B, McCarty KM, Nadine S, Beate L (2010) Lead exposure and children’s health. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care 40:186–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Strange ED, Onwulata CI (2002) Effect of particle size on the water sorption properties of cereal fibers. J Food Qual 25:63–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Taghipour T, Karimipour G, Ghaedi M, Asfaram A (2018) Mild synthesis of a Zn(II) metal organic polymer and its hybrid with activated carbon: application as antibacterial agent and in water treatment by using sonochemistry: optimization, kinetic and isotherm study. Ultrason Sonochem 41:389–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Taraba B, Bulavová P (2018) Adsorption enthalpy of lead(II) and phenol on coals and activated carbon in the view of thermodynamic analysis and calorimetric measurements. J Chem Thermodyn 116:97–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Tavares FO, Pinto LADM, Bassetti FDJ, Bergamasco R, Vieira AMS (2017) Environmentally friendly biosorbents (husks, pods and seeds) from Moringa oleifera for Pb(II) removal from contaminated water. Environ Technol 38:3145–3155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Tipre DR, Dave SR (2004) Bioleaching process for Cu–Pb–Zn bulk concentrate at high pulp density. Hydrometallurgy 75:37–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Tkacova K, Misura BM, Vigddergauz VE, Chanturiya VA (1993) Selective leaching of zinc from mechanically activated complex Cu–Pb–Zn concentrate. Hydrometallurgy 33:291–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Tournassat C, Davis JA, Chiaberge C, Grangeon S, Bour IC (2016) Modeling the acid–base properties of montmorillonite edge surfaces. Environ Sci Technol 50:13436–13445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Uddin MK (2017) A review on the adsorption of heavy metals by clay minerals, with special focus on the past decade. Chem Eng J 308:438–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. van der Sloot HA (1991) Systematic leaching behavior of trace elements from construction materials and waste material. Stud Environ Sci 48:19–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wang D, Lin Z, Wang T, Yao Z, Qin M, Zheng S, Lu W (2016) Where does the toxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles come from: the nanoparticles, the ions, or a combination of both? J Hazard Mater 308:328–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Wang J, Zeng G, Huang D, Hu L, Xu P, Huang C, Deng R, Xue W, Lai C, Zhou C, Wang Y, Li L, Luo C, Wang X, Duan H (2018) Removal of Pb2+ from water environment using a novel magnetic chitosan/graphene oxide imprinted Pb2+. Int J Biol Macromol 86:505–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Zaki AA, Ahmad MI, Abd El-Rahma KM (2017) Sorption characteristics of a landfill clay soil as a retardation barrier of some heavy metals. Appl Clay Sci 135:150–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Zhang Y, Cao B, Zhao L, Sun L, Gao Y, Li Yang F (2018) Biochar-supported reduced graphene oxide composite for adsorption and co-adsorption of atrazine and lead ions. Appl Surf Sci 427:147–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Science Press, Institute of Geochemistry, CAS and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of ScienceNiger Delta UniversityWilberforce IslandNigeria
  2. 2.Nigerian Institute of Mining and GeosciencesJosNigeria

Personalised recommendations