Advertisement

Acta Geochimica

, Volume 36, Issue 3, pp 389–391 | Cite as

Sequestration of carbon as carbonate in the critical zone: insights from the Himalayas and Tibetan Plateau

  • Albert Galy
  • Yibo Yang
  • Xiaomin Fang
Open Access
Original Article
  • 1.2k Downloads

Abstract

The carbon pool stored in soil carbonate is comparable to the soil organic carbon. Therefore, secondary calcite precipitation in supersaturated catchment could be an important, yet poorly constrained, carbon sink within the modern global carbon cycle. The chemical analysis of some dissolved species transported by rivers, such as elevated Sr/Ca and Mg/Ca ratios but also heavy stable Ca isotopic compositions, witness the formation of secondary calcite in rivers draining arid regions. However, in areas affected by active tectonics and rapid physical erosion, co-variations in the fluvial Sr/Ca and Mg/Ca ratios could also be related to incongruent carbonate weathering processes. Here, we present a model to assess the roles played by incongruent carbonate dissolution and secondary calcite precipitation in modern weathering processes. We tested and applied the model to rivers draining the Himalayan–Tibetan region. The results suggest that regional aridity in the drainage basin promotes carbon sequestration as secondary carbonate but that for a given runoff, incongruent dissolution of carbonate possibly related to rapid physical erosion amplifies such sequestration. The isotopic compositions (13C/12C and 18O/16O) of detrital carbonate transported by the main rivers in South and South-East Tibet imply that around 1% of the suspended material transported by those rivers corresponds to secondary carbonate and can represent between 5% and 15% of the alkalinity flux. Most of these alkalinity transported as particulate material is, nevertheless related to the weathering of carbonate lithologies and is also subjected to dissolution prior its final storage in sedimentary basins. However, on glacial-interglacial timescale this will amplify the significant role of mountain weathering on climatic variations.

Keywords

Carbonate Weathering Isotope Tectonic forcing 

1 Introduction

Stream geochemistry in the headwaters of the rivers draining the Southern and Eastern side of the Tibetan Plateau (TP) suggests that carbonates dissolution dominates the fluvial water alkalinity budget (Wu et al. 2008). In detail, the contribution of aeolian dust can also be significant, especially in the NE part of the Plateau (Jin et al. 2011; Zhang et al. 2013). However, the determination of carbonate chemical weathering flux requires the identification of the carbonate subjected to weathering and a quantification of their detailed chemistry. This task is not easy since traces of bedrock carbonates in fresh plutonic metamorphosed rocks (e.g. Blum et al. 1998; White et al. 1999; Chamberlain et al. 2005) and even trace calcic minerals (Oliva et al. 2003) are generally recognized as key Ca-rich end-member sources. Although disseminated carbonate compositions in silicate rocks are well constrained in the Himalaya (e.g. Blum et al. 1998; Galy et al. 1999; Tipper et al. 2006; Chapman et al. 2015), the composition and variability of carbonate-bearing rocks in the other edges of the TP remain poorly defined. In addition, the determination of the carbonate chemistry and mineralogy in the source rock should improve paleo-reconstruction of this region since proxies derived from soil carbonates, such as 87Sr/86Sr, δ13C, δ18O, and trace elements (e.g. Cerling et al. 1993; Quade et al. 1989, 1997; Li and Li 2014) are hampered by the presence of detrital carbonates in sediments (Fan et al. 2007; Li et al. 2013). Here we present a method to determine the Sr/Ca and Mg/Ca ratios of carbonate present in the lithology undergoing weathering from the riverine chemistry and the bulk carbonate composition of terrestrial sediments (e.g. loess, sand and silt and paleosol). This also determines the chemistry and quantity of authigenic carbonate end-member. In addition, we have analysed the suspended material (SM) exported by several large rivers (Yarlung, Salween, Mekong and Chang Jiang rivers) in South-East Tibet. Both types of carbonates (authigenic and detrital) are present and contribute to the export of the alkalinity associated to the chemical weathering of the area.

2 Methods

For carbonate, sediment were crushed to <200 mesh powder and leached with 10% acetic acid (liquid/powder ratio >10) for 1 h in an ultrasonic bath at room temperature. Supernatants were then separated by centrifugation and analysed using a Leeman Labs ICP-OES at the Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Sr, Mg and Ca concentrations were expressed in parts per million (ppm) of the weight of dry powder. Replicate analyses of samples show that relative standard deviations from the mean value were <2%. Comparison with literature data are restricted to carbonate composition data based on diluted acetic acid leaching (Liu et al. 2002; Yokoo et al. 2004; Jin et al. 2010) or HNO3 leaching using careful multi pre-treatments (Li and Li 2014). Crushed sediments were also analysed for the amount and isotopic composition (δ13C, δ18O) of carbonate by reaction with >100% H3PO4 at 70 °C overnight on a Thermo Finnigan GasBench system coupled to a MAT 253 mass spectrometer by the continuous flow method at the Centre de Recherches Pétrographiques et Géochimiques, CNRS. The determination of the chemistry and quantity of authigenic carbonate is based on the careful analysis of log Sr/Ca–log Mg/Ca, since authigenic carbonate precipitation is characterised by a constant gradient of (DSr − 1)/(DMg − 1) in this space, dependent only on the partition coefficients (e.g. Yang et al. 2015).

3 Results and discussion

River data in northern China are characterised by a very strong correlation between their Sr/Ca and Mg/Ca ratios. These observations would suggest that carbonate weathering and precipitation dominate fluvial water composition changes. However, secondary calcite precipitation and incongruent calcite dissolution (Yang et al. 2015) are unable to represent the overall picture found in northern China and in the large rivers of the northern China and the Himalayan–Tibetan region (NCHT) region. Some of the differences can be related to a widespread contribution of aeolian sediments (Yang et al. 2017). However, the best explanation is a combined effect of incongruent dissolution and secondary carbonate precipitation, albeit variable from catchment to catchment. In line with the findings in rivers draining the Himalayan region (e.g. Galy et al. 1999; Jacobson et al. 2002; Tipper et al. 2008; Bickle et al. 2015; Chapman et al. 2015), many more NCHT rivers are affected by secondary calcite precipitation. For instance, based of the chemistry of the dissolved species, around 2/3 of the Ca released in the catchment of the Yellow River by the weathering of rock has precipitated as calcite. Such value implies a secondary calcite precipitation flux of 0.14 Tmol yr−1, more than the carbonate precipitation flux induced in the oceans by the alkalinity flux of the Yellow River. This clearly highlights the significance of the secondary calcite precipitation. This also illustrates the underestimated role of arid region rivers in regulating the global carbon cycle. Other rivers, such as the Yarlung Tsangpo upstream the Eastern syntaxis (Hren et al. 2007) have left behind more than 50% of the Ca as pedogenic carbonate. Part of those carbonates can still be exported by the river but as particulate. The δ18O of the bulk carbonate of the SM is negatively correlated with the reciprocal of the carbonate concentration. The high carbonate content display δ18O values characteristic of the detrital metamorphic Himalayan carbonate (e.g. Galy et al. 1999). The lower δ18O values can only be produced by low-temperature precipitation from 18O-depleted waters, characteristic of rainwater and river water sampled in Tibet. Therefore a low carbonate content of around 1% by weight in the SM in Southern Tibet corresponds to the export of secondary calcite. In the case of the Yarlung Tsangpo—Brahmaputra catchment, those pedogenic carbonate do not reach the ocean since under-saturated waters characteristic of the very wet south flank of the Himalayan range in this catchment dissolve all the carbonate in the SM exported from Tibet (Singh et al. 2005). However, weaker monsoon condition around the Eastern syntaxis of the Himalaya in the past might have exaserbated the precipitation of pedogenic carbonate in Tibet and promoted its export to the Ocean.

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bickle MJ, Tipper E, Galy A, Chapman HJ, Harris N (2015) On discrimination between carbonate and silicate inputs to Himalayan rivers. Am J Sci 315:120–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blum JD, Gazis CA, Jacobson AD, Chamberlain CP (1998) Carbonate versus silicate weathering in the Raikhot watershed within the high Himalayan crystalline series. Geology 26:411–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cerling TE, Wang Y, Quade J (1993) Expansion of C4 ecosystems as an indicator of global ecological change in the late Miocene. Nature 361:344–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chamberlain CP, Waldbauer JR, Jacobson AD (2005) Strontium, hydrothermal systems and steady-state chemical weathering in active mountain belts. Earth Planet Sci Lett 238:351–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chapman H, Bickle M, Thaw SH, Thiam HN (2015) Chemical fluxes from time series sampling of the Irrawaddy and Salween Rivers, Myanmar. Chem Geol 401:15–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fan M, Dettman DL, Song C, Fang X, Garzione CN (2007) Climatic variation in the Linxia basin, NE Tibetan Plateau, from 13.1 to 4.3 Ma: the stable isotope record. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 247:313–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Galy A, France-Lanord C, Derry LA (1999) The strontium isotopic budget of Himalayan Rivers in Nepal and Bangladesh. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 63:1905–1925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hren MT, Chamberlain CP, Hilley GE, Blisniuk PM, Bookhagen B (2007) Major ion chemistry of the Yarlung Tsangpo-Brahmaputra river: chemical weathering, erosion, and CO2 consumption in the southern Tibetan plateau and eastern syntaxis of the Himalaya. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 71:2907–2935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jacobson AD, Blum JD, Walter LM (2002) Reconciling the elemental and Sr isotope geochemistry of Himalayan weathering fluxes: insights from the carbonate geochemistry of stream waters. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 66:3417–3429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jin ZD, Wang SJ, Zhang F, Shi YW (2010) Weathering, Sr fluxes, and controls on water chemistry in the Lake Qinghai catchment, NE Tibetan Plateau. Earth Surf Process Landf 9:1057–1070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jin ZD, You CF, Yu JM, Wu LL, Zhang F, Liu HC (2011) Seasonal contributions of catchment weathering and eolian dust to river water chemistry, northeastern Tibetan Plateau: chemical and Sr isotopic constraints. J Geophys Res 116:F04006. doi: 10.1029/2011JF002002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Li T, Li G (2014) Incorporation of trace metals into microcodium as novel proxies for paleo-precipitation. Earth Planet Sci Lett 386:34–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Li G, Chen J, Chen Y (2013) Primary and secondary carbonate in Chinese loess discriminated by trace element composition. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 103:26–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Liu L, Wang H, Chen Y, Chen J (2002) Chemical leaching of loess deposits in China and its implications for carbonate composition. Acta Pet Miner 21:69–75Google Scholar
  15. Oliva P, Viers J, Dupre B (2003) Chemical weathering in granitic environments. Chem Geol 202:225–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Quade J, Cerling TE, Bowman JR (1989) Development of the Asian monsoon revealed by marked ecologic shift in the latest Miocene of northern Pakistan. Nature 342:163–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Quade J, Roe L, DeCelles PG, Ojha TP (1997) The late Neogene 87Sr/86Sr record of lowland Himalayan rivers. Science 276:1828–1831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Singh SK, Sarin MM, France-Lanord C (2005) Chemical erosion in the Eastern Himalaya: major ion composition of the Brahmapu-tra and δ13C of dissolved inorganic carbon. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 69:3573–3588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Tipper ET, Bickle MJ, Galy A, West AJ, Pomiès C, Chapman HJ (2006) The short term climatic sensitivity of carbonate and silicate weathering fluxes: insight from seasonal variations in river chemistry. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 70:2737–2754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Tipper ET, Galy A, Bickle MJ (2008) Calcium and magnesium isotope systematics in rivers draining the Himalaya–Tibetan-Plateau region: lithological or fractionation control? Geochim Cosmochim Acta 72:1057–1075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. White AF, Bullen TD, Vivit DV, Schulz MS, Clow DW (1999) The role of disseminated calcite in the chemical weathering of granitoid rocks. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 63:1939–1953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wu W, Xu S, Yang J, Yin H (2008) Silicate weathering and CO2 consumption deduced from the seven Chinese rivers originating in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Chem Geol 249:307–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Yang Y, Fang X, Galy A, Zhang G, Liu S, Zan J, Wu F, Meng Q, Ye C, Yang S, Liu X (2015) Carbonate composition and its impact on fluvial geochemistry in the NE Tibetan Plateau region. Chem Geol 410:138–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Yang Y, Galy A, Fang X, Yang R, Zhang W, Zan J (2017) Eolian dust forcing of river chemistry on the northeastern Tibetan Plateau since 8 Ma. Earth Planet Sci Lett 464:200–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Yokoo Y, Nakano T, Nishikawa M, Quan H (2004) Mineralogical variation of Sr–Nd isotopic and elemental compositions in loess and desert sand from the central Loess Plateau in China as a provenance tracer of wet and dry deposition in the northwestern Pacific. Chem Geol 204:45–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Zhang F, Jin Z, Li F, Yu J, You C-F, Zhou L (2013) The dominance of loess weathering on water and sediment chemistry within the Daihai Lake catchment, northeastern Chinese Loess Plateau. Appl Geochem 35:51–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre de Recherches Pétrographiques et Géochimiques (CRPG), UMR7358, CNRSUniversité de LorraineVandoeuvre les NancyFrance
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of Continental Collision and Plateau Uplift, Institute of Tibetan Plateau ResearchChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  3. 3.CAS Center for Excellence in Tibetan Plateau Earth SciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations