Advertisement

Journal of Thermal Science

, Volume 28, Issue 5, pp 915–928 | Cite as

Entropy Generation Analysis in a Mixed-Flow Compressor with Casing Treatment

  • Qianfeng Zhang
  • Juan DuEmail author
  • Zhihui Li
  • Jichao Li
  • Hongwu Zhang
Special column for the memory of Professor CHEN Naixing
  • 65 Downloads

Abstract

Casing treatments (CT) can effectively extend compressors flow ranges with the expense of efficiency penalty. Compressor efficiency is closely linked to loss. Only revealing the mechanisms of loss generation can design a CT with high aerodynamic performance. In the paper, a highly-loaded mixed-flow compressor with tip clearance of 0.4 mm was numerically studied at a rotational speed of 30,000 r/min to reveal the effects of axial slot casing treatment (ASCT) on the loss mechanisms in the compressor. The results showed that both isentropic efficiency and stall margin were improved significantly by the ASCT. The local entropy generation method was used to analyze the loss mechanisms and to quantify the loss distributions in the blade passage. Based on the axial distributions of entropy generation rate, for both the cases with and without ASCT, the peak entropy generation rate increased in the rotor domain and decreased in the stator domain during throttling the compressor. The peak entropy generation in rotor was mainly caused by the tip leakage flow and flow separations near the rotor leading edge for the mixed-flow compressor no matter which casing was applied. The radial distributions of entropy generation rate showed that the reduction of loss in the rotor domain from 0.4 span to the rotor casing was the major reason for the efficiency improved by ASCT. The addition of ASCT exerted two opposite effects on the losses generated in the compressor. On the one hand, the intensity of tip leakage flow was weakened by the suction effect of slots, which alleviated the mixing effect between the tip leakage flow and main flow, and thus reduced the flow losses; On the other hand, the extra losses upstream the rotor leading edge were produced due to the shear effect and to the heat transfer. The aforementioned shear effect was caused by the different velocity magnitudes and directions, and the heat transfer was caused by temperature gradient between the injected flow and the incoming flow. For case with smooth casing (SC), 61.61% of the overall loss arose from tip leakage flow and casing boundary layer. When the ASCT was applied, that decreased to 55.34%. The loss generated by tip leakage flow and casing boundary layer decreased 20.54%) relatively by ASCT.

Keywords

numerical simulation mixed-flow compressor loss mechanism casing treatment 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful for the financial support from National Key R&D Program of China under Grant NO.2018YFB0606100, the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant NO. 51790510 and NO. 51727810.

References

  1. [1]
    Legras G., Gourdain N., Trebinjac I., Numerical analysis of the tip leakage flow field in a transonic axial compressor with circumferential casing treatment. Journal of Thermal Science, 2010, 193: 198–205.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Ma N., Nan X., Lin F., Numerical study on effects of axial-slot casing treatment on peak efficiency of axial compressors. Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2016, Seoul, South Korea, GT2016-56554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Du J., Li F., Li J., Ma N., Lin F., Chen J., A study of performance and flow mechanism of slot-groove hybrid casing treatment in a low-speed compressor. Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2015, Montreal, Canada, GT2015-43920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Guinet C., Streit J., Kau H.-P, Gunner V., Tip gap variation on a transonic rotor in the presence of tip blowing. Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2014, Dusseldorf, Germany, GT2014-25042. https://doi.org/10.1115/GT2014-25042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Sun D., Nie C., Liu X., Lin R., Sun X., Further investigation on transonic compressor stall margin enhancement with stall precursor-suppressed casing treatment. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2015, 138(2): 021001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Kroeckel T., Hiller S.J., Jeschke P., Application of a multistage casing treatment in a high speed axial compressor test rig. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2011, 7: 309–318.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Hathaway M.D., Passive endwall treatments for enhancing stability. 2007, NASA/TM-2007-214409.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Fujita H., Takata H., A study on configurations of casing treatment for axial flow compressors. Bulletin of JSME, 1984, 27230: 1675–1681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Brandstetter C., Wartzek E., Werner J., Schiffer H-P., Heinichen F., Unsteady measurements of periodic effects in a transonic compressor with casing treatments. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2016, 138(5): 051007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Streit J.A., Brandstetter C., Heinichen R., Kau H-R, An advanced axial-slot casing treatment on a treansonic compressor: a close look with computational fluid dynamics and experimental validation. Journal of Power and Energy, 2013, 2276: 683–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Koch C.C., Smith L.H., Loss sources and magnitudes in axial-flow compressors. Journal of Rngineering for Power, 1976, 983: 411–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Denton J.D., Loss mechanisms in turbomachines. Journal of Turbomachinery, 1993, 1154: 621–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Sakulkaew S., Effects of rotor tip clearance on an embedded compressor stage performance. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston, America, 2012.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Cevik M., Vo H.D., Yu H., Casing treatment for desensitization of compressor performance and stability to tip clearance. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2016, 138(2): 121008.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Rolfes M., Lange M., Vogeler K., Mailach R., Experimental and numerical investigation of a circumferential groove casing treatment in a low-speed axial research compressor at different tip clearances. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2017, 139(2): 121009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Kock R., Herwig H., Local entropy production in turbulent shear flows: a high-Reynolds number model with wall functions. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2004, 47(10–11): 2205–2215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Kock F., Herwit H., Entropy production calculation for turbulent shear flows and their implementation in CFD codes. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2005, 264: 672–680.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    Li Z., Du J., Jemcov A., Ottavy X., Lin E., A study of loss mechanism in a linear compressor cascade at the corner stall condition. Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2017, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA, GT2017-65192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Lin D., Yuan X., Su X., Local entropy generation in compressible flow through a high pressure turbine with delayed detached eddy simulation. Entropy, 2017, 19(1), 29.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Nan X., Liu L., Ma N., Lu Q., Lin E., Numerical investigation of entropy generation distribution in a transonic compressor. Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2016, Seoul, South Korea. https://doi.org/10.1115/GT2016-56519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Teicel S., Verstraete T., Seume J., Optimized multidisciplinary design of a small transonic compressor for active high-lift systems. International Journal of Gas Turbine, Propulsion and Power Systems, 2017, 92: 19–26.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    Du J., Seume J.R., Design of casing treatment on a mixed-flow compressor. Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2017, North Carolina, USA, GT2017-65226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    Zhang Q., Du J., Li J., Zhang H., Numerical study on flow structures and stall mechanisms on a mixed-flow compressor. Proceedings of Third Chinese International Turbomachinery Conference, 2018, Chong Qing, China.Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    Shen W., Tong Y., Engineering thermodynamics. Beijing: Higher Education Press, Beijing, China, 2007. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    Paoletti S., Rispoli F., Sciubba E., Calculation of exergetic losses in compact heat exchange passages. Proceeding ASME, 1989, 102: 21–29.Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    Hwang Y., Kang S-H., Numerical study on the effects of Casing treatment on unsteadiness of tip leakage flow in an axial compressor. Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2012, Copenhagen, Denmark. https://doi.org/10.1115/GT2012-68444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    Bindon J.R., The measurement and formation of tip clearance loss. Journal of Turbomachinery, 1989, 1113: 257–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    Zhang Q., Du J., Li F., Zhang H., Numerical study effects of axial-slot casing treatment on flow field in a mixed-flow compressor with various tip clearances. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2019. (in Chinese) (in press)Google Scholar
  29. [29]
    Furukawa M., Inoue M., Saiki K., Yamada K., The role of tip leakage cortex breakdown in compressor rotor aerodynamics. Journal of Turbomachinery, 1999, 1213: 469–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    Hewkin-Smith M., Pullan G., Grimshaw S.D., Greitzer E., Spakovszky Z., The role of tip leakage flow in spike-type rotating stall inception. Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2017, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA, GT2017-63655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    Wang W., Wang J., Pu X., Liu H., Application of entropy generation theory to flow loss analysis in transonic axial compressor. Proceedings of AJCPR Xiamen, China, AJCPP2018-096.Google Scholar
  32. [32]
    Du J., Li J., Zhang Q., Felix K., Joerg R. Seume, Experimental study on the influence of casing treatment on near-stall unsteady behavior of a mixed-flow compressor. Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2019, Phoenix, Arizona, USA, GT2019-92034. (Accepted)Google Scholar
  33. [33]
    Li Z.Y., Numerical simulation of axial compressor and construction of entropy generation loss model based on the hybrid RANS/LES method. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China, 2017. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  34. [34]
    [34] Kramer-Bevan J.S., A tool for analyzing fluid flow losses. University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada, 1992.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Science Press, Institute of Engineering Thermophysics, CAS and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Qianfeng Zhang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Juan Du
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Zhihui Li
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jichao Li
    • 1
    • 2
  • Hongwu Zhang
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Advanced Gas Turbine Laboratory, Institute of Engineering ThermophysicsChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  2. 2.University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations